I have a brother laser printer for years, can confirm.

My friend has one that's like ten years old, works fine too.

The software is a bit janky and all that but it works.

I have a Brother laser printer. It regularly goes into such a deep sleep that no force on this Earth can wake it up when it's time to print, because it's too deeply unconscious to respond to "wake up" signals from computers. It cannot print without first being brought out of its coma by a troubleshooting software.

So I'm not going to put that in the category of printers that just prints every time like it's supposed to without issue.

It's good relative to what we have now, but it can't hold a candle to some of the warhorses we had in the past.

Brother still can't do inkjet right? I read somewhere there's a big patent that lets only a select few companies be able to sell inkjet printers.

I used to have a laser printer, and they're great for documents, but now what I print most are photos, and for that pigment-based inks rock.

I have an Epson printer but even if they're nowhere near as bad as HP, Epson also has some weird shit from time to time.

Nah the main issue is they're designed to be shit, to force you to spend more money.

Firstly there's no reason the loss of say a scanner should result in failure of the printer functionality, that's poor design. Secondly, why are so many of these extra features failing when so many people rarely if ever use them? Sounds very much like planned obsolescence. Printers are a total scam.

My $300 Brother laser printer that does everything works just fine because it wasn't designed to be a money-siphoning piece of shit.

I don't know. It's commonly accepted that their lyrics have a bit of an anti-estabishment sentiment, but statements such as "believin' all the lies that they're tellin' ya / buyin' all the products that they're sellin' ya", or even "fuck you I won't do what you tell me" (stated by the machine) can just as easily applied to most situations where a printer is involved. Maybe there's somehing to it?

Yep, Brother rocks.

Too lazy for my usual lengthy monologue about Brother when this comes up, but works well with Linux, far more reasonable ink cost than any other brand I've tried, and the even low end 'inkvestment' model we have has really lived up to its claims regarding ink longevity. It doesn't even hassle you when you use off brand ink, but I only tried hat once since I had so little complaint about the Brother ink. You do lose ink level indication, which is annoying, but that's it, and manually checking level is also easy with this style of printer.

My kids started school and I had a need to print lots of medical forms and other paperwork, I bought a brother laser printer. Because it was basic and functional and didn’t try to force me into an ink subscription that gave them permission to disable my hardware.

The cleaning cycle thing is pretty common with any inkjet. My old HPs all do it when I havent used them in a while.

Drawing people in with open questions.

I have a Brother black-and-white laser printer, and it is, in fact, evil. I commented about it in this thread in fact: it never prints when it's asked to because its deep sleep is so deep that computers can't communicate with it without the use of troubleshooting software. So it doesn't fit the requirement of "prints without any problems".