this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
898 points (99.1% liked)

Today I Learned

16440 readers
369 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 135 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And in case you haven't been paying attention, the Trump fascists want to undo all that with Project 2025.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course they want no fault divorce gone. They want their spouses stuck with them and unable to flee from the insanity.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 22 points 1 month ago

They are populated by a lot of misogynistic and sexually frustrated guys trying so hard to overcompensate what little manliness they think they have. The kind that think it's OKAY for THEM to cheat but not the other way around.

There was a dude from TikTok recently that's going to get sentenced for life for murdering his wife and someone she was seeing. His reason? He tried using provocation and his emotional instability as the reason. Like, fuck you dude, you're insecure and you didn't use your brain power to divorce and dump her but instead you got to go and kill her?

Now imagine that shit amplified if Republicans or Trump get into office. Women left and right would not only be imprisoned in relationships or even marriages to guys that presumably lied about themselves to get their way with these women. But now guys would have practical immunity if they even think the woman they're dating with is cheating to kill them.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I actually came across this statistic in this article about those guys wanting to make divorce much harder, which linked to the study: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/05/no-fault-divorce-gop-republicans-mainstream-podcast-dudes/

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In addition to the men who are pushing these laws are the women who have bought into the same misogyny and support women being forced to stay in marriage. Frequently the same women who oppose abortion rights.

It is primarily men, but they wouldn't be successful without that support.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The fact that there are women who support this bullshit is something my mind can't comprehend. Are they sociopaths, sycophants, brainwashed.. or all of the above? I try to be mindfully empathetic and attempt to understand differing opinions even if i disagree...but I really struggle with this one. I just can't get there.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, so I know this is about the most obvious suggestion possible on this subject, but if you haven't, and if you get a chance, read The Handmaid's Tale and its sequel, The Testaments.

They both have some really fascinating portrayals of women being or becoming complicit in the oppression of other women by a male-dominated system (while still also being oppressed themselves - their complicity is often a way of surviving in that system).

They're obviously not the be all and end all of the subject, but they really made me think about the kind of people you're describing, because I have (and still do) often felt the same - how can they do these things to other women?

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for the suggestion! I've been meaning to read handmaid's tale, and I didn't know there was a sequel. I'll have to get them as audio books to listen to at work. Anything to help me understand what's going through their heads.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

No problem, and I'm thrilled to have recommended it to someone who hasn't read it yet! :-)

The sequel is good, but not as good as the original IMO. The original is magnificent. Devastating at times, but definitely one to read.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

There's no 'want' to it.

They already have. Idaho got away with criminalizing abortion, which means 2/3 of the states will do the same next session, just like how 2/3 of the states still allow for you to be paid $7 an hour.

In the absence of a true opposition party, the wolves are feasting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's infuriating to listen to people talk about lack of divorce (in certain cultures, times, etc) thinking it means a successful marriage.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There's a comedian who did a bit that was something like "A lot of my friends have parents who got divorced. Mine should have but didn't. I think I had it worse".

Paraphrased horribly, but if someone recognizes this bit, please let me know because I've long since forgotten even though the gist of it has stuck with me.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Also infuriating is a certain psychologist saying "kids from parents that stay together do better", completely missing the point that there was dysfunction which led to divorce.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] myusernameis@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

I mean I recognize it, but as something I frequently say to my therapist. (They finally divorced when I was 24).

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Many states will not allow a divorce if the woman is pregnant, it's a twisted cycle of abuse and control.

A study recently published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons found that states that restricted abortion access from 2018 to 2020 had a 75 percent higher rate of peripartum homicide — people who were killed while pregnant or in their first year after giving birth — than states without restrictions. The same trend did not hold in homicide rates for men.

Just like the pieces of shit that rail about "No fault divroce destroying the family", Restrictions on the bodily autonmy of women leads only to death and misery, I refuse to call those people "pro-life" or "pro-family", they are simply anti-womens rights.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How is divorce a matter of consent?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Traditionally both parties had to agree to get divorced if there had not been some "grounds" for the divorce that could be proved in court. That's why the classic business for old timey private detectives was proving that their client's spouse was committing adultery in order to legally justify a divorce.

[–] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

So women having rights killed an entire genre

Edit Noir is the genre

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Well idk if I would say that, it was just a classic trope. Noir is very much alive and defined by not having any "good" charcters, just lots of shades of gray quasi heroes. "Nightcralwer", "Emily the Criminal" and "Girl with the dragon tattoo" movies are great examples of modern noir. That trope is just dated, but also still used in sci-fi like Blade Runner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Nah, PI work just became a lot more desk jobby between the stakeouts you end up doing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Probably lowered the rate of dudes "accidentally" ingesting arsenic in their coffee too.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was reading a book where people anonymously share confessions. And one was about a person who worked at a Hospice providing care. They shared a lot of old women, on their last days, would confess to murdering their husbands.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There's an ancient Greek story about a city where young women were killing themselves at an alarming rate, and the city eventually enacted a law where if a woman killed herself the body would be paraded through the streets naked before burial. After that law, the suicides dramatically went down.

The misogynistic interpretation of the author recording the story was that women were ashamed at the thought of being seen naked, even after death, and so this curbed the suicides.

My own interpretation is that it's hard to hide bruises on a naked body.

No one should be trapped in a situation where they feel the only option out is suicide.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

My own interpretation is that it’s hard to hide bruises on a naked body.

Considering that the ancient Greeks literally allowed men to murder their wives under certain conditions, I'd say that seeing bruises on a woman's body would elicit no outcry amongst them.

Also... fuck ancient Greece. And fuck the Roman empire, too.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I was curious so I did a tiny amount of research and as it turns out, you're pretty much in line with the data.

Information on ancient Greeks beating their wives is pretty sparse and what little we have suggests that it was so common that it barely deserved mention.

Beat their wives, fucked their kids, and gave rise to the society we've inherited today.

Persia should have one at Thermopylae

[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What do you mean "fuck them", they don't exist any more...

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

But idiots who romanticize and glamorize them are.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Were there laws allowing wives to murder their husbands under certain conditions?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

None that I've heard of.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I had no idea there states that if you're female you can't get a divorce without consent. That's insane. I'm going guess they're all red states since they're big on not respecting women.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would the socialists oppose women's right to choose?

[–] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

In US. politics, red refers to places with a (usually large) majority of Republican voters.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's the same for both persons In a marriage though

Sure, but when these laws were passed they were intended to keep women down. Just like women couldn't vote or have back accounts. The fact they still exist, along with more of our rights being reduced, shows the misogynistic intent.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The law in Missouri, for example, only bans pregnant women from seeking a divorce.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 24 points 1 month ago

Podcaster Tim Pool said no-fault divorce is “ruining relationships,” on an episode where he cites Jordan Peterson and jokes that, “maybe we would just be better if, I don’t know, women just had to wear red dresses and bonnets.”

I know what would actually make the world a better place, but I can't say it here.

[–] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably saw a decline in husband mysterious deaths too ^^

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I mean, yeah. It would be harder to track, but desperate people do desperate things when the law makes it hard to leave.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't tell that to your local conservative party...

Or do, they don't care

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Women suffering is a feature for them, not a bug

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voran@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And people hound me about how I'll die with cats and desperately regret not having a man to wash smelly socks for.

Marriage is psychological adrenalectomy.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Idk, I usually wash my wives dirty socks more often than she washes mine I'm pretty sure

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

My wife washes I hang and fold. team work makes for more sexy time.....

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Laundry is irrelevant if it's on the first floor. I'll do everyone's but they gotta fold

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 14 points 1 month ago

Cats are cool and so are you. Whatever works for you is the correct decision!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Just female suicide rate? I'd like to know the difference in married women rates. The difference in rate should be even bigger.

load more comments
view more: next ›