this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
576 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

58970 readers
3683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 167 points 1 week ago (7 children)

we've been seeing these "twitter's in biiiiiiiiig trouble now!!" headlines for how many years now?

yet people refuse to just delete it

i can't wait for the day i can go a full 24 hours without twitter shit showing up on every feed

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I deleted Twitter as soon as Space Karen took over.

However, my friends and so many people I follow on other platforms still link their Twitter profiles. For some there needs to be something solid to make a real and consistent migration. I was overly hopeful that Threads (yes, another evil) would have buried Twitter.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Threads stood as much chance as Google Plus had against Facebook.

Zuckerfucker using a somewhat similar strategy to artificially boost Threads membership (login with instagram once, you can't delete your threads account without also deleting the instagram one) speaks volumes.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I also like the absurd amount of permissions it requires. Meta couldn't let their guard down for a moment.

To clarify, I mean Meta couldn't be a little less data hungry in order to take marketshare from Twitter. They instantly needed access to absolutely everything at the start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we've been seeing these "twitter's in biiiiiiiiig trouble now!!" headlines for how many years now?

this time it's for realsies.

yet people refuse to just delete it

Many journalists want to feel connected, and since many politicians have a presence on Twitter, they feel like they can't. That means Twitter gets referenced way more than necessary in news stories, which feeds its popularity.

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't think twitter will ever go away until all of a majority of all major sports teams and leagues, a majority of legislative body members, and major news and wire services have a sustained and active presence on bsky. it right now is literally coasting on everything that made it useful pre 2022 and every stupid fucking thing elon has done to make the twitter experience worse hasn't done enough to cause a critical mass of people to jump.

once you see major popular twitter accounts like rex chapman, mark hamill, taylor swift and the like (and I say this not because of their politics but because of their massive follower base) regularly post on bsky you can probably start closing the book on twitter.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 56 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Whelp, did mastodon got something out of this screwup?

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mastodon struggles a bit to pick up pace.

Found this:

https://www.makeuseof.com/why-people-leaving-mastodon/

It explains some pain points.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Basically it’s “I can’t get ✨ engagement ✨ on Mastodon”

People want big amounts of likes and reposts you don’t get that on Mastodon, the system is too distributed for that.

Bluesky gives them the big numbers

[–] owlboy@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They want an algorithm.

As much as people mock it, or know it’s the source of why social media optimizes for outrage and other unhealthy behaviors, the algorithm is what they are missing on Mastodon.

As someone who always used third party Twitter apps, and never directly saw the algorithm in my timeline, mastodon feels like Twitter always did.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn we can’t get influencers? How will we live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mastodon is fantastic for niche things. For example myself and my colleagues use it for work stuff and I also use it with a few friends for gaming. that's it. Beyond that if you're going to Mastodon to reach a lot of people and chase clout or what have you you're gonna have a bad time. you'll just be shouting to the void in many cases. I also use it to connect with people using linux for help and suggestions.

But just read feeds on Bluesky and you'll see many people, probably the vast majority, just say they want something that "just works" and them trying to use Mastodon was too difficult. They didn't understand the instances and what have you. It's a generation that's been raised on downloading an app, tapping on it, and it works. Login with your google, facebook, or apple id...that's it.

People these days simply don't want to do too much to use something. they don't want to customize their online experience like we used to do years ago. If it doesn't instantly "work" right out of the box, they won't use it. And even regardless of how much they'll complain about using it and all it's bugs and foibles (X/Twitter, Windows 11, etc) they'll continue to use it cause, again, "it just works".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

People want to socially interact on a platform with the intention of letting you socially interact. I understand Mastodon intends to do the same thing as.BlueSky so the question is why is BlueSky more.popular.

As someone who uses both. Mastodon's UI and signup process is not as straight toward at least that is my personal reason why.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The reasons mentioned in the article:

One reason is that it seemed tech-savvy users heavily dominated the platform, making it difficult for regular social media users to find their way and feel comfortable on the platform.

I think that's saying the content tends to be very niche and it's hard to find people with similar non-tech interests.

and

Users have described their timelines (and even the explore tab) as “stale” because there’s often not much interesting content to consume or engage with.

This lines up with my experience: it's hard to find people with similar interests. Even when you do, people aren't saying much of interest.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

BlueSky has the one thing Fedi doesn't: a large advertising budget. Hate to say it, but we have lost.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Bluesky is decentralized only in its name. And media storage.

[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Better than the burning garbage inferno that is xitter.

[–] helopigs@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] John_CalebBradberton@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Taking a page out of Valves book.

Doing nothing and let the competition drive customers your way.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not really what Valve did. Valve kept doing cool things that benefit the customer, while the competition actively drove them away.

I don't follow social media. Is BlueSky feature rich and only getting better?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The biggest thing that valve did that kept them in everyone's good graces is that steam's core functionality hasn't had any major changes in years. Dare I say, more than a decade.

It's a platform where you buy games, download them, and play them.

In the early days you still had to deal with all the bullshit, including third party launcher installs and crap to get things going, and over time, valve simplified all of that, making it easier than ever to take advantage of the core function of steam: buying, downloading, and playing games.

Literally the only improvement I can absolutely, positively credit them for, is making that entire process, easier, simpler, and quicker, than ever.

Sure, you can chat to people, track achievements, comment on your profile, comment on your friends profiles, buy and sell cosmetics on the market thing, even voice chat and I think they have a way you can stream your game to friends.... Not sure on that last one.

It's like Facebook, FB marketplace, FB messenger, discord, Twitter... And a bunch of other services, all huddled together to make a bastard child with the entire PC video game industry.... That's steam.

But the core mechanic that was always the main reason why steam was great, remains the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's a lot of art, cats, and big tiddy cartoons. I haven't found anything too onerous in its UI, the community has a somewhat toxic level of positivity but that's certainly better than the general toxicity of most of the web these days.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'd say mastodon is a better choice, mostly so that you're not beholden to yet another profit-focused tech corporation. I'm sure Bluesky is fine right now, but once they have their userbase they will shift to monetization - and you may regret letting yourself become entrenched in the world they control. They're not doing it for your benefit.

That said, I've come to understand that a lot of people kind of like having their content feed controlled by others. When they only see what they ask for, they get bored. So I'm expecting Bluesky to always be bigger than Mastodon.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's all cyclical anyway. No social media company will reign forever. We've already seen a number of them rise and fall. It's kinda like how different civilizations gained and lost dominance throughout history.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago

Glad to see people leaving X. I look forward to it’s end.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've been on Bluesky and Mastodon but I'm seeing people pretty happy with how less toxic it is on Bluesky.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Just wait until enough sane people have left Twitter; it'll then implode and the fascist Nazi shitheads will migrate.

They don't want an echo chamber- they want to be able to shout their slurs and right-wing bullshit at you while you can't respond. It's exactly why places like Voat and that shitty T_D knockoff crashed. Once the ratio of right-wingers to non-right-wingers on Twitter hits a critical amount, they'll start looking for other places to infest.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (26 children)

I'm on Bluesky. I have seen a drama increase in followers in the last few days since Twitter let blocked people see content that were blocked from.

It's a big blow to Twitter that people are finding someplace, anyplace , else to go.

I had to decide if I was going to Mastodon or Bluesky. I picked Bluesky because after reading Mastodon's integration problems with itself I wanted nothing to do with it. It couldn't scale unless each instance played nice and in the years since it went live they had refused to do that and showed no signs of even moving in that direction.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I have seen a drama increase in followers

If there's one thing a social media site loves, its a drama increase.

It’s a big blow to Twitter that people are finding someplace, anyplace , else to go.

Honestly, more than anything, it feels like an indictment of Threads. That was supposed to be the big party spot for creatives, journalists, and D-list celebrities following the burn out of Twitter. But modern Threads just feels like the worst kind of Hype-House crossbred with LinkedIn.

BlueSky feels a lot more like a vintage '00s social media site, which is all people really wanted. Hope it survives its own popularity better than Twitter did. But for now, life is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Go to your favorite content creators and ask them to create a profile on Bluesky. If you don't ask them, how are they supposed to know?

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

The problem with this at least in my circle of content creators is that they're all millennials or older(no offense to millennials I'm one myself) but because of that, they either have a I'm not putting more effort into make an additional social media platform or they take their handle on blue sky but then actively participate in the mainstream Services more, neglecting BSky. I've only ever really seen artists use that platform so the other forms of content creation hasn't followed

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I'm still on the fence about that...I think it'd make more sense for many to drop social media and opt for their own site with RSS feeds. A lot of social media for some is little more than a noisier RSS reader. Sometimes even literally with those with auto-playing videos. 😬

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As a counterexample to this comment, if any of my creators switched over to an RSS feed I probably would stop getting updates from them because that's more hassle than when I can just go to one service and see everything in one place

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What you describe is basically the flipside of what happened to RSS folks, so I know what you mean. It sucks to stop getting updates the way you're used to, and more hassle making the transitions to whatever the different method is.

It's basically the reason Twitter/X still has anyone there, except they have higher switching costs compared to an open following format.

Honestly I take the compromise approach where I can, which is social media that still generates RSS, like Bluesky/Mastodon/etc. and use that to avoid making additional accounts.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yea I think that's a good compromise, I want creators to go on Bsky so its all in one place... (and I can escape the Political and ad succumbed hell that is X), RSS would be an interesting route but like, it would need a feed for every creator wouldn't it? unless the social media platform allows it built-in like BSky does

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

RSS would be an interesting route but like, it would need a feed for every creator wouldn’t it? unless the social media platform allows it built-in like BSky does

If I understand ya right yeah, with BSky/Mastodon you pull the individual feeds for each account if you go that route (or maybe someone has an .opml file of several already grouped by topic to import). To me it's no worse than having to individually follow them on-platform, but I know I'm atypical in that respect

Once ya have'em it's all in one feed in your reader so not too different than the following feed

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Microw@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Theoretically, yes. Practically, the way their model is set up, it costs a lot to host a federated server so no one is doing it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›