776
literally me (lemmy.ca)
submitted 3 months ago by nave@lemmy.ca to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 108 points 3 months ago

Part of the issue for me was the audio is mixed so that you can barely hear the dialogue.

[-] Z4XC@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

I find that with a lot of movies lately

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

It was worse around 15 years ago.

You want to hear things well, though? You'll need surround sound system and to turn up the center speaker. That's where they generally mix the voice audio.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Ugh, I hate that so much! Especially since I sometimes like to fall asleep to a movie I've seen many times before and at the end just drift off to the sound of it.

"Whisper whisper whisper EXPLOSIONS AND YELLING whisper whisper whisper" is probably my least favorite style of sound mixing.

I like to be able to hear the quiet parts without the loud parts bursting my ear drums, thank you very much!

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You may want to see if your TV has a “night mode” in the audio settings. It’s basically just an audio compander, (combination of compressor and expander.) It expands the quiet parts to be louder, and compresses the loud parts to be quieter. It destroys any kind of dynamics that the director intended, and can cause some difficulty with intelligibility if there’s lots of background noise, (because the noise is getting expanded too!) But for watching things at night, it’s almost a must for dynamic movies.

Some brands call it headphone mode, because headphone users also frequently complain about dynamic audio too; They turn up to hear the quiet parts, then get their ears blown off during the loud parts.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Sounds like exactly what I need, thanks! I'm watching on a tablet on the bed next to me, but if it's available on TVs as a mode, it's probably available for VLC on Android too.

It destroys any kind of dynamics that the director intended

Fuck their intentions lol. Having a huge gulf in loudness is good for two things only: jump scares and Michael Bay type movies trying to impress you with how loud things go boom. Both are just annoyances to me at the best of times and keeping me from falling asleep at the worst.

can cause some difficulty with intelligibility if there’s lots of background noise

That might be a drawback, though. On the other hand, who keeps in a lot of background noise in the first place? Morons and amateurs, that's who! 😛

Some brands call it headphone mode, because headphone users also frequently complain about dynamic audio too; They turn up to hear the quiet parts, then get their ears blown off during the loud parts.

Yup, I know that all too well as a daily headphones/earbuds user for the last several years, maybe even a decade..

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

I highly recommend using Nova video player. It's an android video player specifically made to handle movies and series. It's got everything you neeed from automatically downloading each movie /episode poster, description, subtitles, got audio boost and night mode. And oh, I almost forgot to say that it's an open source project and it's available on f-droid.

It's a shame that the app is barely known, so if you enjoyed it, please share it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I’ve heard it’s because it’s mixed for surround sound

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Optimized for peak surround sound, allegedly. I have a $5000 system and it still sounds like shit. I can understand it, but it's shit nonetheless.

Snobby ≠ good, methinks.

[-] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago

Not being able to hear the dialogue is an artistic choice Nolan has been intentionally making since around The Dark Knight Rises. I know that sounds dumb but, I’m not joking. I have been baffled by this choice and have refused to see any of his films until Oppenheimer. Which was a major improvement.

[-] Maven@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I would NOT call Oppenheimer a major improvement! It was one of my least favorite theater experiences because I couldn't hear half of the dialogue and the whole thing was way too loud.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I heard it was mixed specifically for high-end theatre speakers. I think Nolan was just too far up his own ass on this one.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I watched it in Dolby Atmos and still couldn't understand shit. It was simply very, very badly mixed. I don't think I'll watch another film from Nolan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's frankly amazing that it managed to make it to release. Who the fuck thought the mix was acceptable? Scene 1 I had no clue what was happening because I couldn't hear! Ridiculous.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Who the fuck thought the mix was acceptable?

That would be Christopher Nolan, who I believe is trolling people with his sound design choices at this point

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I... "got a copy" and it was fine on my television. I dont even have external speakers (built in speakers). I wonder if the digital release fixed this issue.

[-] books@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I watched in on a plane and didn't have the audio issue I've heard everyone talk about.

I did however have the issue of not understanding the flick.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Nolan has lost the plot and has become one of those directors who loves the smell of his own farts. Can't hear my shitty audio? That's your fault! You didn't understand my ridiculous plot? That's your fault! Etc.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Hot take, but the one where Matthew McConaughey gets stuck in a bookshelf was ass too. It started out good, but then got way too up it's own ass with interdimensional nonsense.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'll give them that I didn't see it coming.

The plot was far too convenient. No spaghetti faction no title forces he could just navigate the tesseract like it was walking across the room.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Gargantua is a super massive black hole.

Spaghettification is caused by the gravitational force experienced at your head being different than the gravitational force experienced at your feet. A black hole formed by a dying star is in the neighborhood of 30km in radius. With a small black hole like that the differences in gravity experience between your head and toes is what leads to the spaghettification.

That's not the case with a supermassive black hole like the one at the center of our galaxy which is the kind Gargantua was supposed to be. Those can be as large as the sun (700,000km), and that's on the small end. Some can even be the size of our entire solar system. Because of their enormous size, the gravitation difference you'd experience between your head and toes is negligible.

And as far as navigating inside the black hole goes, that's actually what Roy Kerr says - the guy that solved the Einstein field equation for a rotating black hole. He says that in the case of a rotating black hole, the singularity at the center is not a single point but a ring. And because of that, spacetime is warped in a way that that would make it navigable. You wouldn't be able to leave (move back up past the event horizon), but you would be able to stay inside and have some effect on your location through your own force. At least that what he says. I'll take his word for it since he's spent a few decades studying it.

As for the bookshelf.... yeah, sorry. Science doesn't say shit about bookshelves inside a black hole. But, you know, it's a movie. It's probably a metaphor or some shit. But Christopher Nolan did a surprisingly good job of being accurate with the theoretical science of a black hole. Feel free to continue to hate the movie for saying love is a fundamental force though.

Sources: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermassive_black_hole

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRir6-9tsJs&t=10m22s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Desistance@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And here I thought that Interstellar made the most sense out of many of his movies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] excitingburp@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

You didn't understand my ridiculous plot?

Why is it such a sin to cater to a different audience to you? If you don't enjoy his movies then don't watch them. He's one of a handful of screenwriters who does complex stuff, there's an absolute deluge of lighter stuff for the rest of you.

What would you say to a person who continues to eat fish, even though they hate it and spit it out each time? "Stop eating fish, that's your fault."

[-] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

To offer a different perspective, I feel like that argument works more for something you knew you didn't like from the beginning, but less so for something you used to like. I don't listen to bands I don't like but when an artist I do like puts out a string of albums I think suck, it's hard not to give each one a shot thinking "maybe this one will be better."

[-] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I tend to disagree with your opinion here. There is a level of objectivity within the realm of taste. I will continue to warn people not to eat pea gravel even if it has a great mouthfeel, for instance.

The plot is less complex than it appears at face value, because at face value most people are lacking the dialogue that despite Nolan’s protestations has a lot of valuable information within it. Is it great art because he makes you suffer for it? Is The Prestige worse because it’s enjoyable to rewatch?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] random_character_a@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

That just means its rewatchable.

Try the movie Primer and then come back to that. Then watch Primer again. Then mix in a little bit of Annihilation and start over.

Extra points if you're stoned.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Annihilation is not complicated at all, the whole thing is just a metaphor for various traumas and how we deal with them.

Natalie Portman and the guy go through the trauma of infidelity within marriage, they both come out changed by it, different yet the same, hence the shimmer in their eyes at the end.

The first scientist chick who dies to the bear, she lost her daughter to cancer, completely out of her control, just like hear death to the bear.

The chick that ties them up, she is an ex addict, she dies to self-destruction, the actions she takes directly lead to her death by the bear, just like an addict their own lives.

The chick who plays Valkyrie in Thor, she suffers from depression and self-harming she dies by giving up.

The main scientist lady, she is dealing with cancer too and her own body betraying and destroying her.

There is a reason they talk about the still alive cancer cells from a 100 years ago at the beginning too.

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It's also a great examination of dream logic and waking nightmares. The lack of a sense of time, the sceen transitions contribute to not being aware of how you got somewhere. Everything, even the people, just feel off. When the main character is holding her husbands hands and it's shot through the glass of water, it makes something ordinary feel weird and threatening.

I especially liked the aesthetic of the transition between a beautiful dream and a nightmare. Like the rainbow swamp at the beginning and suddenly being attacked by the albino alligator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

When I first watched Primer I immediately watched it a second time in the same day.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

i really hate that shit where they intentionally cut the movie in a really shitty annoying confusing way just to make the story ostensibly more cOmPleX rather than just writing something good and relying on its strength like a normal good film

the prestige really pissed me off

[-] Pinecone@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

The Prestige was one of the most comprehensible movies Nolan ever made...

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Essentially the people have the ability to go backwards or go forwards in time. To go back or forward in time you need to go through an entrance, red means forward, blue means backwards. Their weapons and bullets have the ability to do this by themselves. The bad group wants to acquire the original source of this power and rewind the entire earth to undo climate change, the good guys believe this would destroy the world instead of saving it. The protagonist is the creator of the group in the future, but sends his associates back in time to recruit his younger self and put an end to this group. The main way they attack in this movie is by one team attacking at one point in time and another team attacking backwards in time. Eventually, the bad guys get all parts of this source and begin the process to reverse all of Earth, but the protagonist wins in the end. This is when its revealed he recruited all these people in the future to save the world, making the ending also the beginning.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Thank you. Also WTF. I did not pick up any of that and I think I've seen it three times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Wait till you watch Memento

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

I saw a YouTube video where like 15 guys in some poor country rigged up a bicycle or something to power a projector that displayed a horrible picture of a movie onto the side of a stack of old tires. They were watching Tenet.

Of all the movies to watch that way..

I would have loved to see them be interviewed about it two hours later.

[-] Random_internet_user@lemmy.today 20 points 3 months ago

James cameron would kill them if they had watched avatar 2

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

He wouldn't just kill them he would hunt them for sport.

[-] stress_headache@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I couldn't hear any of the dialogue.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAM

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

I think Tenet is amazing. Yes, it's confusing but you'll manage. If you get the main points, you can enjoy this movie even if you don't get every detail

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago

Tenet was quite boring. I like interstellar and inception a lot more.

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Hm i found interstellar really boring. Tenet at least had stuff to think about, even though when you actually did the thinking it only lead to dead ends.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

You you have to get the VHS version and watch the whole thing on rewind to understand it.

Call me a dummy but I just don't want to be engaged in this way as a form of entertainment.

[-] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I really liked tenet and planning to rewatch it again. I watched it at home with headphones and subtitles, so once they sound issue went away, it was a pretty straightforward movie, even with all the time confusion.

[-] velvetThunder@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

I usually don't watch dubs of shows I can understand in the original.

So anyway. I watched tenet dubbed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lil@lemy.lol 4 points 3 months ago

Personally, I did understand most of the movie, but not the last part.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Then how did you understand the movie?

The last part is basically just showing all the things with inverting yourself and going "backwards" in time instead of forward

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
776 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

25103 readers
4168 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS