Viking_Hippie

There's a podcast sequel to Orphan Black

Squeals like a little girl and heads to AntennaPod app

I considered it, but the word substitution probably makes it more or less imposed to guess based on an image alone lol

Yes. Which is why they provide free scones for 45 minutes.

It is heh. I found it by duckduckgo image searching for something that would fit the text lol

As to the specific setup that the government chose, I can't vouch for that.

That's what we're talking about, though! That's the topic!

If I was to go on and on across several comments about how nitrous oxide is pleasant to inhale and then go "I don't know about nitrogen asphyxiation, though" at the end, you'd be very annoyed with me and rightly so!

Those warrants from the ICC can't come quickly enough!

I'm reluctant to ask but.. WTF is a JABBER'S SOAP??

But doesn't the change open up for litigation in small claims court?

More like mandates it. For those who live in the country to even have ACCESS to it. The vast majority of Steam users don't (while the US has more users than any other single country, it's still only ~14m out of 120m) and would also need a lawyer licensed to practice in both countries afaik.

So nah, I don't suspect that this change will benefit the users in general, rather the opposite..

I don't think it is. If it's anything like the US court systems I know more about (criminal, juvenile, immigration, main civil court), it's extremely backlogged already.

And that's even before considering jurisdiction and how much more a lawyer licensed to practice in at least two countries charges.

Even IF you decided to go through with it in spite of everything, you could easily end up spending thousands of dollars fighting an $80 case and STILL be likely to lose.

Have you experienced being murdered by the government in front of an audience? Using a method that's humane if (and ONLY if) you're completely calm and fully cooperative?

The exact circumstances matter.

Which is why it's best to let the user choose rather than force one or the other.

The reason why we always hear about companies forcing arbitration is because arbitration is best for them when it comes to the big stuff that the news report on, compared to court.

The reason why we never hear about the opposite is twofold:

1. it doesn't happen as often and

2. "yamanii didn't get their refund approved even though they were entitled to according to the rules" isn't something that makes headlines or even makes it to court.

as I understand it, arbitration is still available (if both parties agree, I assume), it's just not a requirement anymore.

Unless the OP is a forgery of some sort, you evidently DON'T understand it.

still seems to me that consumers are getting more options which is usually a good thing.

Nope. They're switching from one mandatory method which favors companies liable to get into big disputes where a court case is advantageous to the consumer, which isn't the case with them, to one that favors a company wanting to avoid a lot of issues too small to warrant a lawyer.

It's not anywhere near as bad for consumers as when a utility company that poisons thousands of people forces everyone to corporate-friendly arbitration procedure (likely with the "neutral" third party much less neutral than the ones Valve used), but it's certainly not GOOD for Steam users to not be able to complain without lawyering up.