339
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Iowa will not participate this summer in a federal program that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.

The state has notified the U.S. Department of Agriculture that it will not participate in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children — or Summer EBT — program, the state’s Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education said in a Friday news release.

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

A bipartisan group of Nebraska lawmakers have urged the state to reconsider, saying Summer EBT would address the needs of vulnerable children and benefit the state economically, the Journal Star reported.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ersatz@infosec.pub 82 points 6 months ago

Haha, let's force poor women to give birth to unwanted children, and then take away the tiny crumbs we've been giving them. Governor, you're a genius!

This is a federal program. It costs them nothing. These people are fucked up monsters.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

That's actually not the case. Per the linked article...

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost an estimated $2.2 million in Iowa, the news release says.

Of course, that's no excuse to turn this program down. Particularly since she also just announced that the state will "end Fiscal Year 2023 with a balance of $1.83 billion in the General Fund, $902 million in reserve funds and $2.74 billion in the Taxpayer Relief Fund." $2.2 million is a drop in the bucket when it would benefit so many needy children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

This is a federal program. It costs them nothing

That's really the most fucked up thing. These are always states that already take far more from the federal government than they provide in taxes, and they complain as if they'd be the ones paying for this shit.

As someone who's in a state that gives far more to the US government in taxes than we take, I should have more of a say where that money goes, and I would prefer to continue giving aid to these children in Iowa. In fact, it should be more.

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 14 points 6 months ago

Her only claim of accomplishment is that the state has a huge surplus, which is simply due to her cutting just about everything simply so she can trigger tax cuts for the rich.

Not even the first federal money she's rejected, when not misappropriating the federal money she has taken

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Some kids are fat so poor kids should starve?

Holy shit GOP.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There's a very good chance the kids that are overweight are overweight in part because the parents can't afford better food as junk food is often cheaper. This could just worsen the problem.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yup. Not to mention, distended bellies are also a symptom of malnourishment. These are the people who will point at starving kids in Africa and claim they're fat.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I'd never heard of that, wow. That's so shitty.

[-] HonorIsDead@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago

I love when this happens and they present no alternative. Choosing a losing option instead of accepting an imperfect effort. Try to improve it? No surely not. Throw it all away. If a social program helps someone I deem unworthy of aid it must be removed.

How small of a person.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 21 points 6 months ago

Their entire party is built around making their constituents angry at other people. Earnst us trying to enrage people because she's ameyeing a national positikn.

I think it's time to just call them on it. Everyone believes in feeding kids. It's not controversial. It's the ethical right thing to do. There is no disagreement between parties here. She's just doing this to try and stir up anger at "them/"others" because she thinks it will make a subset of people vote for her.

[-] Vaginal_blood_fart@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

The biggest Republican. Is still a fucking small person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

This is so fucking stupid, not only does this feed kids the money goes to local retailers but a huge chunk also buys Iowa food products. What the fuck is wrong with that idiot

[-] extant@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

They have never experienced poverty so they think it's fine because if they were in that situation they would pull themselves up by their bootstraps or whatever delusional shit they come up with. To them it's non-issue and everyone in poverty must be lazy.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

Haha yeah, stupid lazy jobless children.

[-] extant@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Now that you mention it they did lower the age limit for working in Iowa this year.

[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 months ago

If these kids didn't want to be poor, they should've thought twice before being born to poor parents

[-] Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Yeah but wealthy donors are complaining the people aren't desperate enough to take whatever job for whatever salary.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

And Jesus said, onto thee, fuck them kids.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 36 points 6 months ago

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

Okay, so they have a better program they're implementing instead to address those issues?

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Well those kids are obese. Probably do them some good to drop a few pounds right?

Seems like a great way to campaign, "you're kids are fat so i am goibg to starve them to make them healthy?"

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

The "pro-life" and "protect the children" party at work

[-] Eigerloft@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

"hey shut up" - conservatives

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Surprise, surprise that Republican Christians don't give a fuck about the welfare of kids in poverty.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Republican Christian should be considered a Sect in this religion.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Sounds like a state that needs to put more funding into basic education.

[-] donescobar@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

They are trying to abolish that too

[-] iquanyin@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

We’re on the bad side of literally every issue. we’re the GOP!

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

These are the same people who pretend to worship Christ but Trump is their new messiah.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

Twelve million children are food insecure in the "Greatest Country on Earth™" and they want to cut spending to feed them.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

The GOP hates children.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

"God, I want to hurt children so much." - Republicans

An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,

Poor nutrition is when the poors have too much access to food. /s

She added, “If the Biden Administration and Congress want to make a real commitment to family well-being, they should invest in already existing programs and infrastructure at the state level and give us the flexibility to tailor them to our state’s needs.”

Read: "Give us money and let us cut taxes for our ultrawealthy donors yet again."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 6 months ago

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

She added, “If the Biden Administration and Congress want to make a real commitment to family well-being, they should invest in already existing programs and infrastructure at the state level and give us the flexibility to tailor them to our state’s needs.”

They don't think the current program to address child hunger is sustainable. They are not replacing it with another program, are they? They're just going to let the kids go hungry?

And people vote for these assholes?

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

That's the Republican way - criticise and cut everything while offering no real solutions

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Fuck kids i guess

[-] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 months ago

My sister in law works in a fast food restaurant. My niece (9 years old) primarily eats fast food for this reason. My SIL gets a discount, she doesn’t have to cook or go anywhere else. To her it’s a way to save money. My niece is slightly overweight and doesn’t like fast food anymore.

Food stamps would help, but nobody can get them to reach out for help. They feel ashamed for some reason.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Children of the corn to get less corn.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Starve your kids to own the libs.

[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I can't even imagine thinking about having this stance. Literally evil

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Big surprise that Iowa is the second worse state to live in in the US

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Surprised she didn't add something about "decreasing the surplus population".

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Yikes

“In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Republican Gov. Jim Pillen told the Journal Star on Friday.

[-] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 6 points 6 months ago

So I guess even church run food banks are too communist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I bet Matt Gaetz was disappointed to find out that this was what his Nebraskan pals had meant when they said they'd be screwing a bunch of kids during summer break.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Oh goodness me no! Why would you want to do that?!? I mean doing something like feeding poor kids is only a hairsbreadth away from total communism.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Do Iowans know how to vote?

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, they know how to vote very well. They just only know how to vote against their own interests because that’s how their pastor told them to vote and because they are scared of brown people and people from shudder New York and California

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lexam@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Finally someone is standing up against. Checks notes. Free school Lunches! Wait what?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago

This is just the, "Don't feed strays. They won't leave if you do." Except they think poor people will magically find the money to move.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
339 points (98.0% liked)

News

21706 readers
5016 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS