this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
310 points (97.3% liked)

Open Source

33554 readers
533 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen many threads suggesting products but they often don't mention FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software. With FOSS you are already boycotting capitalism, on either side. Free and Open Source ignores borders and shouldn't be categorized in nationalist terms, no matter where some of the maintainers happen to live.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 25 minutes ago

Free software is the antithesis of capitalism. It doesn't make sense to boycott them.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 42 minutes ago

Is someone doing that? If it's FOSS it's from the internet.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I would think it depends on the project

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 35 minutes ago (2 children)

Are there US open source projects?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 minutes ago

I don't know about that, to be honest.

I don't have any hard data to back me up, but anecdotally I find that most FOSS software I use is headquartered in Europe. Quite often Germany. There are many maintainers from all over the world, but I feel like (again...in my experience) Europe has always been bigger into starting such projects.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 points 53 minutes ago

Use common sense. The nation isn't the only consideration.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago

I came into this thinking its more like "Oh no open sores is full of communists let me pay for worse software I never own" which is an argument that comes from the same camp as "this software I don't like is woke"

[–] chmod755@feddit.org 7 points 1 hour ago
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm the most anti-American user on here and I agree.

I'd rather use USA-linked free software than Spotify.

[–] reboot6675@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

Wasn't Spotify Swedish tho? But yeah

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Originally, yeah. Currently more like a publically traded multinational corporation. Their current board seems to be almost completely american: https://investors.spotify.com/governance/default.aspx

Management team on the other hand is almost completely Swedish though.

[–] ksp@jlai.lu 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I get it as an European that it means more to me to consume "locally" and to prioritize services that are European-based. But due to the nature of computers and FOSS, borders are redefined and it is more about ideas and politics rather than physical location. However, computers and servers are also physical and submitted to legislations of countries, we cannot ignore laws such as the Patriot act and the power that the American state can have even on FOSS projects.

For me the priority is to use software that match my needs; if I have the choice between an American and an European solution, I'll tend to choose the latter one.

[–] DishonestBirb@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

I canceled ongoing donations to several projects based in the US and stated that my reasons for doing so was US policy against my country. It doesn’t matter if the dev or project lead supports those policies or not, I refuse to contribute to the US economy if I can at all help it.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

If you are worried about US laws affecting FOSS projects, it can always be forked, perhaps even be rewritten.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Agree with the main point, though disagree that FOSS is "boycotting capitalism", many for-profit companies contribute to FOSS and FOSS can be used by for-profit companies too, much of today's capitalism runs on FOSS.

The point of free software is that it does not have owners, so what exactly are you "boycotting"?

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Tell it to the Russian Linux devs that foss has no owners :-) Theory and practice are 2 different things

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

They can fork it, if nobody wants to work with them anymore that's their problem

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 hours ago

FOSS doesn't mean that you are entitled to a place at the table or that your contributions have to be accepted. Nothing prevents these Russian devs from continuing to to work on the kernel.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 39 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Seeing people look for corporate social media alternatives is painful.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

I agree, but am happy that X is losing users to Bluesky, so I don't try to convert friends and family from Bluesky to Masrodon. I'd rather they start changing other stuff instead that is easier.

[–] chebra@mstdn.io 36 points 6 hours ago (10 children)

@Irelephant

> "Hey guys, I want to leave X, should I go to Bluesky or Threads? What? Mastodon? Never heard of that. Looks very complicated, I'll pass"
> -- CEO, founder, IT wizz on LinkedIn

Every time!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 53 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

From a purely "vote with your wallet" standpoint it doesn't make sense, because there's no money paid. However, one might worry about data/information getting in the hands of a fascist/compromised government. So I think people should judge this themselves case by case.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 hours ago

I think the important part is about who is running the server, rather than who made the software

The fediverse is interesting in that context because each instance can decide where they set up the infrastructure or how they process data / requests. The same applies to self hosting

I saw an article that outlined which country each fediverse platform "originated" from, such as Canada for Pixelfed and Germany for Mastodon. That's fun to know about, but otherwise not important to users compared to the instances themselves

At most it might speak to which laws will govern the project itself, but even then someone can fork a project that goes astray

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sith@lemmy.zip 20 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Totally agree. The majority of Americans are great people. Not everyone is MAGA. We need to support the good ones. Sanctions and boycotts tend to unite.

One exception would be if the project imposse a security risk because key people and servers, within the US, may be blackmailed or pushed by the new administration. We're not there yet though. And I hope these projects and people migrate if this becomes the case.

Also, FOSS projects run by big tech are probably also wise to avoid for strategic reasons.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

Totally agree. The majority of Americans are great people.

Not choosing to vote or speak is endorsing the establishment. We are not great people. We are dumbfucks.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The majority of Americans are great people

They're not the majority if they can't win an election — just sayin'.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

a minority of the population voted for trump though, it's not like 50+% of the total population voted for him, it's 50+% of the voters, a lot of people just didn't vote.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

a lot of people just didn't vote.

So they decided that it was just fine if he won and saw no reason to oppose what he stands for...

Yeah, that's some good people right there I can see that /s

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Voter ID, gerrymandering, not allowing absentee voting, no day off.

Not everyone was able to vote, and that disproportionately affected Democratic voters.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

All true. But the world also watched a huge amount of voters rejects dems over gaza. While trump had no better plans on gaxa.

Much like Ukraine his only argument is "i am better and every one else was stupid"

The argument often heard. "Voting the lesser of 2 evils is still voting evil".

So yes these folks very much voted the greater of 2 evils by refusing to vote the lesser option. And much of the rest of the world is rightfully sorta pissed at the evil they allowed in.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe a system that regularly gives us "evil vs lesser evil but still evil" as our only options isn't worth saving

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 1 hour ago

Sorta like the trolly problem.

You can flip the lever to kill 5 or 1. But if you choose not to and also don't fucking bother to hit the breaks. Your still responsible for killing 5 instead of 1.

If you are not willing to actually stop the evil fai.ing to selects make you the bigger evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 6 points 6 hours ago

Fair enough. I'm still smarting from that election result, all the way across the pond.

On the other side, I don't count people as "great" who can't be bothered voting against bigoted authoritarianism. But different strokes, I'm sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

if its run by a big company then it's just open source and not free, or do you mean something like a company contributing to the code?

[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 57 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

lol who is suggesting boycotting foss projects?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 33 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I think OP means that one shouldn't boycott FOSS projects just because they are from USA. That said, I don't like to be told what I have to do and don't agree to "FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software". My pc, my LAN, my rules.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I don’t like to be told what I have to do and don’t agree to “FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software”. My pc, my LAN, my rules.

...he said, without a hint of irony.

Meanwhile, "my PC, my LAN, my rules" is precisely the reason I do agree with always preferring FOSS to corporate software.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] not3ottersinacoat@lemmy.ca 32 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Counterpoint: Fedora is a testing bed for Red Hat. One of Red Hat's notable customers is the US military. I'd prefer to stay off that path if I can help it. It's a matter of trust, and it's a matter of indirectly contributing. I've seen people say the same things about Deepin and everyone nods in agreement, but why the hell should I trust a US project, for the same reasons?

[–] RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 8 hours ago

Honestly this should be a wake call to the FOSS community that we are way too reliant on the US.

Every default we have is US centric and if FOSS is really meant for everyone we should move away from that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›