bramkaandorp

joined 11 months ago
[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Looks like it's two separate projects.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Having read it again not too long ago, I was actually surprised by how much of it was not good.

The framework was interesting, but much of the actual writing wasn't nearly as good as I had thought.

Maybe it's because I had read it in a Dutch translation the first couple of times, and the translator had had improved the prose without intending to, or maybe it's because it was many years ago.

Whatever the reason, I felt like it needed another pass of the editor.

The movie, on the other hand, still thrills me every time I see it.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Intellectual property owners.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you say "non-political", what do you mean?

The movie is about national division. I find it strange that any movie could do that without having any politics in it.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Such a good choice!

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The Planetfall books by Emma Newman are set in a corporatocracy.

 

I love Kim Stanley Robinson’s books, and am reading (in some case re-reading) his books in order. At some point, I’m going to get to Green Earth, but since it’s a reworking of the Science in the Capitol trilogy, I wanted to find out just how much it adds/leaves out/changes.

Is the difference significant enough to merit a “re-read”? I'm particularly interested in characterization, but I'm also curious if the science itself has been significantly changed, with resulting plot changes.

Thanks!

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It reminds me of the Animaniacs reboot. Technically well made, and all the ingredients are there, but the spark is not quite there.

Maybe that was true in the previous reboot as well, but it's been a while since I've seen it.