Isn't the AI content on specific communities for that can be blocked if you don't want to see it?

There is a debate to be had about AI generated art, which is trained on artist's work and may not be the harmless fun people might think. AI summarising an article seems a different beast as it is merely pulling from that one piece and, while there may be questions about accuracy, it doesn't seem as harmful. I'd, personally, want to read an article myself but it could be useful for other people. I could see an AI summarising videos being an actually useful tool.

I'm just here to say I don't want to read AI generated texts. Not even when marked as such. I prefer human to human communication. Generation quality isn't there yet by a long shot.

I get what you're saying but so far in my experience here the vast majority of AI content is at least identified as such. AI content is here to stay and in my opinion attempts to remove/ban it will just make it more insidious. If you go back to Reddit AI posts/comments are everywhere and absolutely none of it is labeled. On lemmy people get to choose to interact with it which I think is probably way better

If society tries to suppress something that will find it's way, you will get it back, but hidden, harder to detect and maybe even changed in a harmful way.

We had it as humanity with alcohol bans, war on drugs, hateful speech bans and etc. We need systematic regulations for unavoidable, not prohibitions which will leak from all places.

Leaving it be while being explicit is reasonable.

I completely agree! The influx of AI-generated content really does feel overwhelming and often lacks the authenticity that makes online communities special. It's frustrating to see platforms getting cluttered with low-quality posts that don't add real value. I love the vibe of the fediverse and appreciate the genuine interactions we have here. Let's keep it that way and focus on meaningful contributions!

I agree. They can fuck off back to their AI filled cave.

I like your enthusiasm. But i just find it easier to avoid all the ai crap. Im not going to waste my time using it, even for "fun" reasons.

Maybe that's the difference between grifters and everyone else. We don't find it necessary to waste our time on the grift.

I won't condone some fun though.

While I'm not particularly fond of using AI for any kind of truthful information, this post reeks of the classic "Quit having fun!" meme. Your value judgement of AI is no more valid than anyone elses, and honestly in my opinion, very misdirected and anger fueled.

It's in everyone's best interest for AI content to be honestly declared. You are almost certainly already consuming AI content from somewhere without knowing it because angry hate mobs have conditioned people to just lie and obfuscate their AI usage to avoid being the target of hate. And if not, you will eventually due to the power of the technology, as the entire creative industry is already silently integrating it, as everyone with an open mind knows, but the benefit of honesty towards closed minded angry people is none, and that situation is a shame.

Good AI usage is impossible to detect, and we should encourage honesty in regards to it.

U talking about !news_summary@lemmy.dbzer0.com?

Gotta love a grift published with an agpl licence. Invented it just to make money from these suckers who will buy anything with the letters AI on it.

Im not generating any articles, images, research etc. Im taking an existing article from an ecisting news source im summarising the article text using a purpise build summarisation model (the model has 60% identical output to that of a human, and >95% retention of meaning) the original article link is still posted with the summary.

The bot exists in its own community. If u dont like it block the community and/or the bot.

This post reeks of Reddit 2.0 typical AI-bashing. I love AI and I'm glad this is a fun place free of corpo shills and useful idiot anprim types.