this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
146 points (86.5% liked)

Fediverse

28828 readers
80 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please kindly take your grift to Reddit, Facebook, or Twitter

With AI generated articles, spam, research, images, tutorials all creating halucinations your AI generated x will be no better and will only create more untrustworthy nonsense that will only clutter the homemade communities, posts, and comments here.

Personally I'm sick of this AI crap that's plastered everywhere like microplastics and PFAS chemicals. The cons most certainly outweighs the pros and the 'tech panaceas' like blockchain, nfts, and llms mostly serves to prop up the rich class.

For the 2 years I've been here the new fediverse feels like what Reddit used to be and should have been before the enshitification and honestly I love it here. So please stop. We don't need a Reddit 2.0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Its not really generation its just summarisation of human generated text.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Assuming it's right.

99% of the time it's hallucinating, inventing two extra authors for the text (each with six fingers), misattributing a quote to at least one of them, and n otoriously missing the point of the article in favour of developing a more click-baity summary.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

Go read the source and review the model page on huggingface and u will find thats not at all true for my implementation. The model im using provides a summary 60% identical to that of a human summary and >95% accurate in maintaining the original meaning.

Plus 99% is one hell of a an exaggeration.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. That means new thoughts and ideas can't ever come from what is currently called Ai.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Thats not what im trying to do tho.