this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
75 points (83.8% liked)

Today I Learned

17686 readers
1306 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The constitution was made to be amended to adapt with the times. Time to amend the 2nd amendment and require a valid reason such as hunting for having a firearm.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Valid reason 1. In order to increase the cost of wide spread authoritarian action against the people of the Unites States.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Americans like to say that but when fascists and authoritarians turn up the most gun obsessed Americans always love them.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Fascist just over value them. Too many socialist under value them.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But the 2nd amendment doesn't increase the cost of authoritarian action. DeSantis just sent rounds of police to people's homes for signing petitions to put abortion on the ballot in Florida.

The 2nd amendment didn't do jack shit to stop him from threatening people for their free speech. Because if a squad of a dozen cops lands on your front door, whether you like it or not you're either going to be shot, detained, your guns taken away, etc. Having a gun doesn't change that. You're fucked, gun or not, if the state sends armed personnel to your home.

And arguably you're more fucked if you have a gun because of how trigger happy cops are. The moment they think you're armed they'll shoot you.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have 100% seen for myself cops shape their response out to places around where I live because the risk is not worth it to them. They focus on serious crimes and will flat refuse to go to do bs calls that are just minor neighbors disputes.

If DeSantis wants to put the state in marshal law he would have to convince the armed citizens of the state that that is ok, or expect violent resistance which again cops are people, and people don't like being shot, so expect hesitation on following some orders.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If DeSantis wants to put the state in marshal law he would have to convince the armed citizens of the state that that is ok,

No he doesn't. All he has to do is send cops to people's homes, one by one, like he just did. Nobody is going to meaningfully stand up to the police if they take people one at a time, one house at a time.

so expect hesitation on following some orders.

There's no reason for there to be any more hesitation. Cops already believe themselves to be doing the most dangerous job, and they outgun you when they show up to your house. For them it's just another day.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is what it means to be delayed and to be hesitant.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. They've got more than enough cops to hit more than one house at a time. In Florida they have about 50k cops. If they sent 10 at a time per house, that's 5000 homes they could invade at a time. That's not hesitant or delayed at all.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those aren't all swat teams, the admin running the counter isn't coming in stomping ass on a moments notice. They aren't all just chilling in the catacombs waiting to march on a moments notice either.

If they did however mobilize to max effect, you don't think the arm population would immediately be on edge? That would be a full martial law order, which could be met with heavy resistance.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

you don’t think the arm population would immediately be on edge?

Not meaningfully. As we've seen time and time again, the 2A crowd is perfectly content to allow the state to be as authoritarian as it likes, so long as it's hurting those pesky undesirables.

The 2A crowd didn't do shit when the 1985 move bombing happened. They didn't do shit when DeSantis started harrasing people with cops in their own homes for using their 1A rights. They didn't do shit when pro-palestinian protesters were getting the shit beat out of them by cops for using their 1A rights. They didn't do shit for the myriad of bullshit wars the U.S. was involved in. They didn't do shit when it came out how many countries the CIA destabilized in Latin America. The nth time will be no different.

The authoritarians have little to fear, because the group that likes to act like they would keep that in check fully support it.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I think you maybe misunderstanding. I mean sure those are things libertarians who are also 2a supporters rail against and fight for those things, but yeah the people who are being targeted the most are the people need to exercise their 2a the most. If the only people armed are faciest or adjacent then only their rights and interests are protected by it. Without the 2a only the states rights and interests (police, DeSantis, etc) are protected with guns.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right? You don't need rights to take up arms against the government, and rights aren't going to fucking help you if you try.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The hard part is getting people to join you to take a stand. To make real change it has to be a significant portion of the population demanding change.

[–] flying_gel@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Nope, not a valid reason.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These are mostly shootings that happened in the vicinity of a school. Natives attacking a schoolhouse while settlers are essentially at war with them. Targeted attacks on individuals who work at the school. The actual intent of using a school and everyone in it as random targets to be slaughtered in some act of pointless revenge or whatever doesn’t happen until much later.

So shootings in the vicinity of schools is definitely not new, but shootings as a deliberate act of terror or screwed up revenge is definitely something that has taken off since the 1980’s.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is such a lie.

The first entry on that list is an attack by indigenous peoples. The rest are basically all what we could consider a school shooting.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Again, most of those are targeted attacks on individuals. E.g. student mad at X person and gets revenge.

Much different from the columbine-like terroristic ones. E.g. killing anyone and everyone they can.