this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37509 readers
229 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Freeman@lemmings.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They pulled DMs of two users of the same instance?! Quite concerning tbh

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 17 points 2 months ago

If we hit these AI companies with targeted suing, like how Scientology got their way with the IRS, maybe we then they can listen to not steal our shit.

The MPAA and RIAA have created all these laws and used our own government againat us. Maybe we can use these same laws and do the same.

[–] sfera@beehaw.org 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was confused for a minute, not understanding what (Apache) Maven has to do with social networks.

[–] Pekka@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe we have some bias on this topic, but I had the same thought. Maven is such a well known tool in IT, that I'm surprised they just created a social network with the same name. Until they get a bit famous this won't be good for SEO.

[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't have a problem with all this scraping, if these companies had to release their models trained on this data as open source.

[–] esaru@beehaw.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a great idea. Can we not apply a license to that social content that forces AI models trained on it to be open source?

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's actually pretty good. And then they're open to getting sued when caught.

I guess it could be done on an instance basis, although I'm not sure how happy fediverse users will be if their instance has an official policy of open-sourcing (or maybe it's public-domaining?) all their content by default.

[–] esaru@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, such a license could just obligat to open source the AI model that has been trained on it. If the instance prohibits training of AI models, or allow it, would be a separate condition that's up to the instance owner, and its users can decide if they want to contribute under that condition, or not.