skullgiver

joined a long while ago
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 12 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Looks like it's one of these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nezara_viridula (third instar, maybe fourth?).

These bugs go through five stages of moulting changing shape and size every time, so in a few weeks they may just look like a bug you'll recognise.

Obviously China's meddling with academic discourse is troubling, but what universities accept busts for random political activists? I don't think I've ever seen any bust in universities that weren't of people of great importance to the university itself.

I also completely get universities not wanting to deal with the anger and outrage of nationalist Chinese expats. They can get real angry when you go against Chinese propaganda, probably a result of many years of brainwashing by the Chinese government in their youth. It just takes one weirdo to deface a statue and suddenly you're in the middle of a massive controversy and need to either file charges (and deal with angry Chinese people) or not (and deal with angry people opposing China's dictatorial regime).

I'm anti-CCP but that doesn't mean I'll accept a bust it a Chinese human rights activist.

Arbitration court with one person is a win for the company. Arbitration court with a thousand people is a massive loss for the company. That's why these arbitration clauses aren't always bad. If anything, for small cases they're good for the people because the bulk of the legal charges are paid by the companies that write these clauses.

A bunch of large companies went through a phase where they all went for arbitration clauses, and a bunch of them moved back quickly after they found out how much more expensive paying for ten thousand arbitration cases was compared to just one single class action lawsuit. Maintaining ten thousand legally binding, individually composed outcomes can haunt them for decades if they're unlucky.

Steam has learned the same lesson here.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy has a toggle in the settings to hide all bot accounts. If you don't like bots, you should turn it on!

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The possibilities are limited and the legal responsibilities untenable. It's a fun idea, though! Technically there's nothing preventing you from distributing WiFi access points in your neighbourhoods and having everyone hook up their home network into a local, shared mesh for instance.

With a private IP address range (probably best to use IPv6 to prevent conflicts there, but you can try to allocate private IPv4 addresses if you like a challenge) you can even have your own internet next to the normal internet and use both.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Based on my experience with drunks around roads, the cars generally aren't at fault. People do real stupid shit when they're drunk, like taking a highway tunnel instead of walking the extra 500m for the pedestrian tunnel. You can have all the protection you want, but if you're to drunk to walk straight and end up in traffic there's nothing to protect you. Same shit also happens with train tracks every now and then. Hell, I've even read stories about traffic deaths when drunk people and bikes collided (especially if the person on the bike was elderly).

If you're drunk enough that you can't navigate the streets about as well as when you're sober, take a cab or the bus or have someone pick you up. That'll also help in case you run into health issues because of excessive alcohol intake.

As a bonus for drunk accidents: because of the delayed response you may walk away from certain crashes with fewer injuries because your body doesn't tense up to attempt to distribute the impact. On the other hand, you're much worse off with other accidents.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think VR headsets put the battery in front of your eyes, the weight would make them uncomfortable. They're probably somewhere on the side of the device, or in Apple's case, around your waist.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Bad chargers, clearly damaged devices that are still used, you name it. Several exploding iPhone stories turned out to be the result of cheap, shitty chargers. Anything with a lithium battery can light on fire or even explode if you handle it wrong.

There's a good chance that Samsung should still be made to pay up for the damages and compensation, but I've seen people do very stupid things to portable electronics containing batteries.

Based on the pictures, the earphone looks like it was on fire on both sides. That's not a literal explosion at least (there'd be more than just hearing damage if it were). My guess is the lithium battery got damaged somehow and the escaping hydrogen gas caught fire One reason not to use earphones that have batteries inside your ear; had the batteries been hanging from the bottom like those Apple ones, the hearing damage probably wouldn't have been as bad.

I've never worked for a company with the shitty HR people complain about online. Must be a regional thing.

I don't have the expectation that HR will always be there to protect you (though one company I've worked for had HR that actively fought upper management for things like raises and pension stuff). HR is there so the company, and by extension everyone in the company, can do their work properly. If you have a conflict at work, they're not obligated to be on your side.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The standards bodies used to recommend /48 as a default and have scaled down to /56. Anything smaller makes sense for stuff like servers but there's no good reason to do it. I guess penny-pinching is a reason, but it's not the norm.

If all else fails, hurricane electric will hand out /48s for free, you just can't use them to watch things like Netflix.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They know you blocked it. They could just hide the element. The feed may be sent to your device, but there's no reason to show blocked content like this.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunate. The Samsung store is probably the biggest non-Chinese competitor to Google Play, and now it's picking up Google's annoying practices.

I know people like to be dismissive about every app they don't personally use, but the Samsung Store really isn't all that bad. A whole bunch of paid apps can be bought there for cheap or even gotten for free sometimes. I wish more people used it so Google would actually feel pressure to make the Play Store better.

view more: next ›