this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30428 readers
438 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All developers should continue to move to other platforms. Do not trust anything unity says.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 34 points 1 year ago

exactly, this is a non-apology. It's just the social media manager who come back to work after the weekend and is trying to mitigate the situation.

There's a chance that they will come out and say "ok we listened to the community, we don't want the 20 cents per install anymore, we want 15 cents"

BTW if they really have a tech that can distinguish pirated installs with a 100% success rate are and not just lying "trust our numbers, they're correct", they should monetize that, developers are paying much more for Denuvo.

[–] TipRing@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

"We apologize for the confusion" is the "I'm sorry you're angry" of corporate communication.

[–] Adramis@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are they also going to alter their stance that Planned Parenthood and a children's hospital aren't charity?

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

Still apologizing for the confusion 🥴

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Not quite sure why they would think there was any confusion. People read the new terms, saw they were a complete and utter cash grab and then spoke up about it. I have no idea how anyone that has the means to switch to another engine isn't doing that right now. Whatever Unity says next will not be trusted.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

honestly, i'm getting tired of board members of corporations just making shitty decisions to try and squeeze more money out of their customers rather than trying to learn what about their product appeals to their customer base in the first place. notice how it's never enough to look at revenue over the years and say, "this is enough, let's keep this steady."

[–] Evergreen5970@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d even be fine with a bit of increase. Have to keep pace with inflation, make sure you’re making enough to keep all your workers’ wages worth the same this year as it was last year.

But they want MORE profit NOW NOW NOW at a much higher rate than needed to keep pace with inflation, and the money sure isn’t going to workers to keep their wages at pace with inflation.

They said kids who failed the marshmallow test (eat one marshmallow now or wait and get two? basically, a test of if you can do delayed gratification or not) were less likely to fail than kids who passed it. But it looks like the instant gratification MORE PROFIT NOW NOW NOW guys are winning. But only if you’re super rich.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and the fact that they tried to retroactively charge folks for using unity...like wtf cmon

[–] harmonea@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The fact that they even tried to pretend it wasn't retroactive because they didn't charge for old install counts. Like, does it charge games that were released under different terms? Yes? Then it's retroactive!

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just the system. This is what happens when people confuse commerce with capitalism: They think that capitalism is being rewarded for doing commerce better. Instead, capitalism is about leveraging ownership of property and underpaying workers in order to get money for free.

And the thing about money is that it's really just a proxy for power. When you only have enough of it to eek out a comfortable life (or less), you don't really notice, because all of your power goes in to achieving or maintaining that acceptably good life (or hanging on for dear life trying to survive), but once your needs are comfortably and handidly met, money is entirely about being able to make other people do whatever you want. And the more money you have, the more things you can get them to do, or the more of them that you can get to do what you want.

And if you've managed to be one of the lucky ones who just get free money for owning shit, then you have the power at your fingertips to try to grow your power over others exponentially, while still doing no honest work in your days. And if you're a shitty person who gets off on all of this, that's exactly what you'll do.

The wealthy are insufferably greedy leeching assholes because one does not become wealthy without being greedy, leeching off of others, and being an insufferable asshole.

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 1 points 1 year ago

Tell me you're poor without telling me you're poor

[–] greenskye@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Companies aren't run to earn profit based on goods and services generated anymore. They are investment vehicles for wealthy VC to use and abuse until they run them into the ground while they jump to the next disposable company. Someday this will result in no effective company existing anymore, but the investors don't care.

If governments were actually functioning they'd recognize this danger and crack down on this behavior because it weakens the country as a whole, but most of the politicians are already bought and paid for.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

That's not how reputation work

[–] corytheboyd@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Aw gee guys we are soooo sowwyyyy that we hurt your feefees

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago

"Oops. Sorry we got caught."

[–] TGames@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Unity was sold on no revenue share, just paying for your dev seats. That they not only tried to weasle out of this by inventing an "runtime fee" but also applied it to already complete games is a fundermental break in trust. There's no ammout of walking it back that can fix that unless they're going to fire anyone who thought this was a good idea. Which of course they're not going to do meaning things like this remain in the table.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know what the implication here is but I feel like I should 'pray they don't alter it any further?'

[–] realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they will make it slightly better, but not by much.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

With designs once people are used to the altered scheme to reintroduce the original scheme

[–] csolisr@sns.azkware.net 1 points 1 year ago

@realcaseyrollins@narwhal.city Regardless, the developers are now increasingly wary about "their" tools not being truly theirs anymore. Same goes for most of the infrastructure they rely on - social media, storage, distribution, the tools they use to design their assets with...