brihuang95

joined 1 year ago
[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

the classics and the newer entries are all great games, super stoked for the next one

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

weird, i'm getting an "Access Denied" page when i click on the link. anyone else?

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 16 points 9 months ago

This is actually very fitting

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

huh, interesting. so from a security perspective is there any other concern with this protocol? at least they're not using a mac relay server like Nothing Chats was

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But not all experts agree. It’s “premature to say it’s going to be a bad year here,” Dr. Michael Osterholm—director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP)—recently told Fortune. While pathogens like flu and RSV peaked earlier than usual during last year’s so called “tripledemic,” the severity of the season “wasn’t beyond usual.” What’s more, low hospital bed capacity and staff levels were under-appreciated factors that contributed to the crisis, making it look worse than it was, he said.

Encouragingly, while U.S. rates of hospitalization from COVID, RSV, and flu combined are on the rise, they remain below levels seen this time of year during the past two years. Still, they’re significantly higher than those seen in the two winters prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

RSV hospitalizations are the highest they’ve been since 2020, with the exception of last winter. And flu hospitalizations are the highest they’ve been at this time of year since 2017, when they were identical—also with the exception of last year.>>

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago (10 children)

this is fucking nuts, i lived not far from that area for years and went to that mcdonald's a block or two away a few times. details are scarce, but here's the local news article

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Playing the remake of Tony hawk pro skater 1+2 makes me want remakes of all the classics...

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

please please please just be entertaining to watch, i don't mind seeing more unhinged nic cage!

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

don't get me started about that cringey romance arc too...

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

damn that's just wild!

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

not my favorite scorsese, but it really opened my eyes to an american story i've never heard of

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

And neither are terrorists 😮‍💨

 

Proton Mail, the leading privacy-focused email service, is making its first foray into blockchain technology with Key Transparency, which will allow users to verify email addresses. From a report: In an interview with Fortune, CEO and founder Andy Yen made clear that although the new feature uses blockchain, the key technology behind crypto, Key Transparency isn't "some sketchy cryptocurrency" linked to an "exit scam." A student of cryptography, Yen added that the new feature is "blockchain in a very pure form," and it allows the platform to solve the thorny issue of ensuring that every email address actually belongs to the person who's claiming it.

Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption, a secure form of communication that ensures only the intended recipient can read the information. Senders encrypt an email using their intended recipient's public key -- a long string of letters and numbers -- which the recipient can then decrypt with their own private key. The issue, Yen said, is ensuring that the public key actually belongs to the intended recipient. "Maybe it's the NSA that has created a fake public key linked to you, and I'm somehow tricked into encrypting data with that public key," he told Fortune. In the security space, the tactic is known as a "man-in-the-middle attack," like a postal worker opening your bank statement to get your social security number and then resealing the envelope.

Blockchains are an immutable ledger, meaning any data initially entered onto them can't be altered. Yen realized that putting users' public keys on a blockchain would create a record ensuring those keys actually belonged to them -- and would be cross-referenced whenever other users send emails. "In order for the verification to be trusted, it needs to be public, and it needs to be unchanging," Yen said.

Curious if anyone here would use a feature like this? It sounds neat but I don't think I'm going to be needing a feature like this on a day-to-day basis, though I could see use cases for folks handling sensitive information.

 
 

Was curious if there were FOSS solutions since I really would like to avoid using anything Google related

 

The headline itself made this worth sharing

 

According to its current privacy policy, with an account, Hue gets access to the configuration of your system to provide the right software updates to the devices. It can only use your data for marketing or share it with third parties if you provide additional consent.

However, in a change to the current policy, Yianni says Hue will not collect usage information from users without additional optional consent. “So, we do not require users share anything about how they use our products,” he says.

“Previously creating an account was consent for usage data processing that we are in the process of decoupling and will be decoupled before accounts become essential — that makes sure it’s possible to create an account without sharing usage data,” says Yianni. However, if you choose to use the cloud services for things like out-of-home connectivity, you will need an account, and Hue will process your data, he says.

If this change to the privacy policy does happen, Home Assistant’s Schoutsen agrees that it would make the requirement for an account more palatable. “But it all depends on the exact changes,” he says.

 

Oh boy, more enshittification

 

well i may have to consider picking this up.

view more: next ›