580
Online Content Is Disappearing (www.pewresearch.org)
submitted 1 month ago by funn@lemy.lol to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] errer@lemmy.world 224 points 1 month ago

God bless archive.org. Fuck the turds trying to bring it down.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

Donate and contact your government rep

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

run the archivewarrior to help them out, donate or pressure your government to stop it from being killed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jode@midwest.social 198 points 1 month ago

The biggest crime against shared knowledge ever committed is photobucket fucking off with the pictures in every "how to fix this car problem" forum post.

[-] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago

There’s some old Reddit posts like this too. Advice threads where the person who posted a solution went back and overwrote their comments during the boycott last year. I know why they did it but we still lost some information in the grand scheme of things.

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 55 points 1 month ago

Most of reddit was already archived before: https://the-eye.eu/redarcs/

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago

And all the "Thanks! Took two minutes to fix after seeing your post" comments just to rub it in.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 151 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The internet is dying. Everyone knows it. Capitalists ruined it and now AI is propping up a decaying corpse.

[-] Hackworth@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

The Internet is dead. Long live the Internet!

I'll have my AI agents talk to your AI agents.

[-] neo@lemy.lol 11 points 1 month ago

You are trying to reach neo. Please select all the pictures with crosswalks. In order to contact an AI agent instead, you must agree to our data policy.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

The Open Web is definitely dying. Some dystopian weaponized ads hellscape of an apps-required shiternet will be around for a while.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

That's an exaggeration. We had nice things back then with forums and ICQ\AIM\others, which we don't have now, but the tech allows us to have them. It's the society that has degraded.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

The technology is working against it too. App search engines are just spam ads now and will never find that niche forum that has what you are looking for, like they once did 20 years ago.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

and will never find that niche forum that has what you are looking for, like they once did 20 years ago.

I remember finding them in web directories, populated manually by people, and from people sharing links.

A search engine was the brute force approach, and you'd find something useful after some manual work on 20+ page of results.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago

I think a lot of stuff got adjusted when mobile became a thing.

Instant message apps just got replaced with Whatsapp, Signal, etc.

Monetisation is a huge problem. Nobody ever expected to make money off a wonky old webpage they made in HoTMetaL, or a MySpace page. Now everyone is on homogenised platforms, they're quite happy to accept bucketloads of money to project whatever you have to say to the masses, and none of it is good. All the hate you see out there isn't society. It's money.

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

This is the main thing that happened, I think. I met some old friends recently I hadn't seen in a while and it's wild how differently we engage with the internet. My main source of interaction is on a laptop, and even then a non-trivial amount of my web interaction is purely via the terminal. Of all of my friends, one of them had a PC, and they don't use it. Their engagement with the internet is purely on mobile devices. I was dumbfounded. Like...how do you do stuff on a phone. I hate phones. They're so much worse than a good keyboard. But I also hate the current version of the internet and they seem to love it.

And that, I think, is the core difference. It's not that the phones took over, it's that the keyboard died for the average user. A keyboard allows a complex degree of engagement that is difficult, if not truly impossible, to match on a device meant for short bursts of canned responses and auto-complete suggestions. It forces individually brief, but ultimately continuous pre-programmed engagement.

And that's the entirety of the modern internet. It's why tiktok is so popular. It's why youtube shoves Shorts down your throat when you visit. It's why Twitter took off. It's also why a website like reddit, that was based initially around the kind of engagement I like, is so hard to monetize and why the attempts at dumbing it down and strangling it of anything that isn't that same kind of superficial engagement (and by God are they trying) is so difficult for the website's leadership: because all the other places that are more profitable than it are designed to do that from the jump, and they have to superimpose that strategy onto a content aggregator whose main attraction was a robust, nested comment system.

I keep thinking about what was, for me, the Golden Age of the internet. I know it's different for everyone, but from around, I guess, 2009 to 2017 I was online a lot. And a lot of what the internet was and how it operated and the ideas there, especially on reddit, were so formative to who I am. And I keep feeling like I never appreciated it or really thought about how vibrant and interesting it was while it was like that. It feels like when you're a kid and you see a wave for the first time, and it's building and building and it seems like it'll be building forever, getting bigger and bigger, but then suddenly it collapses under its own weight and is gone as if it were never there, and after the fact you just wish you'd appreciated it for the wonder it was in that moment. Part of it's just getting older and the general feeling of nostalgia that comes with age, but sometimes that nostalgia is justified.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Anon518@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Forums are still around. People just got lazy and started using reddit instead. Search engines are also to blame since they don't bring up smaller forums in search results. People can go back to forums if they want.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 115 points 1 month ago

This is why we need the internet archive

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes. And wikis, too.
We (people in general) have a tendency to share stuff in forums, like Lemmy. That's fine in the short term, but in the long term this stuff should be sorted, organised, and preferably mirrored. Wikis are perfect for that, while the internet archive is more like "bulk" storage.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 month ago

This is why Discord is poison to our shared pool of knowledge, it's such a black hole for many games and software (especially ironically enough open source projects) in lieu of decent docs.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago

Thanks for giving me another bone to pick against Discord ¬¬
Seriously. Fuck Discord.

[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ugh!

The worst part is, after wasting a bunch of time tracking down the correct Discord server to ask a question about a piece of software, you generally get lambasted by the "regulars" of that server to "just use the search feature, that's what it's for!"

Yeah, no. I don't want to wade through a reverse chronology of a bunch of conflicting back-and-forth conversations - just gimme a FAQ or some actual documentation!!!

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wikis are not really a defense against this issue, they are by nature a secondary or (occasionally by policy) a tertiary source of information. Once the source they are recording dies so does the value of that page on the wiki. From the OP:

54% of Wikipedia pages contain at least one link in their “References” section that points to a page that no longer exists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

You should see it in person. Just drove by it today. Support them!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

In most cases, this is because an individual page was deleted or removed on an otherwise functional website.

How is this news? I bet a lot of pages were also added in the same time frame, very likely orders of magnitude more.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

I’ve heard the early Internet age referred to as the future dark ages. When all the work, information and content is digitized, it’s prone to being lost to history forever.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Early Internet - yes, but then there's the middle Internet (or the high Internet if you like, like high Middle Ages) which was in large part scraped by archive.org, and also people generally still knew about offline backups in both eras, and then there's the late Internet, which moved to siloed services and at the same time most people using it were and are oblivious about preserving data elsewhere. That's the worst one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Because those pages had information that wasn't on the new pages?

Just from my own experience, WotC migrated the Magic the Gathering site to a new one, and while some articles were brought over there were a whole lot of stories, strategies and event coverage that were lost or are only available thanks to Archive.org

[-] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I ran across software once that wouldn't compile properly and the only documentation available was an archive.org hosted backup of an Intel help page that no longer exists. There is no alternative, Intel just removed it entirely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

I bet a lot of pages were also added in the same time frame, very likely orders of magnitude more.

No. What you'd make a page for in the 00s, you'd create a FB group or something in the 10s. Hostage to corps and probably too removed for whatever reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eskimofry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Sure a lot of pages of ad infested ads replaced human produced content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zooi@feddit.nl 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Donate to the internet archive!

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

This is important. I signed up a week ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago

This content has been moving from free accessible internet into the walled gardens of social media. we did it ourselves. blogs and forums disappeared, copycat farms and SEO made it so maintaining blog or a community forum a waste of time, everyone is just tiktoking and looking to monetise every bit of content they put on the internet.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’ve often wondered what the implications of the internet will be for future historians. On the one hand, there is now an enormous body of writings from not just the educated elite as in the past but from all sorts of ordinary people, which is something that has never really existed before.

On the other hand, how and for how long will these writings be retained? If we stop writing things on paper, will these digital writings become completely inaccessible at some point? Could we have a situation where there are almost no writings from a certain period down the road? That would be unfortunate.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 month ago

Freely licensed works will be preserved a lot better because there will be more copies of them.

Likewise the fediverse is a step in that direction: this message will be federated to hundreds of servers so is more likely to survive longer than if I posted it to reddit.

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago

Already a lot of stuff is becoming one harddrive failure away from being lost forever. Companies don't care about preserving content, so it's largely up to random people happening to have saved a copy of something for it to still exist at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

This allows the ruling class to write history as they see fit.

[-] mbirth@lemmy.mbirth.uk 24 points 1 month ago

I believe it's often because nobody does their own website anymore but instead uses managed services, e.g. Medium. Or bits of information, that would've been worth a blog post some while ago, end up on sites like StackOverflow, Reddit, etc.. And once these services want to monetise these contents, they usually start with limiting public access.

And OTOH TikTok, Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts are doing everything they can to further limit people's attention spans and get them addicted to those services. So the people capable of and/or interested in producing proper "content" are dwindling, too.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

It is more important to archive things you like if you got the space. Even if you don't plan on using it for a long time.

[-] N01R3@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 1 month ago

I remember a small RPG maker game that I no longer can find on the web, let alone anything that used to be hosted on FreewareFiles or Raymond.cc...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] randompasta@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

The content isn't significantly disappearing. It is being consolidated and monetized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

That's pretty interesting. It looks like they define inaccessible links as urls that get a 404 or the server doesn't resolve.

I wonder if there are any real implications of this. We seem to know it and work around it in some cases, e.g. StackOverflow saying answers need to contain quotes from pages they reference.

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago

For some real-world examples of this issue, you can look at how the only reason we have any of the early BBC news reels and TV shows is because of copies recorded by people on their TVs. The BBC reused the tapes that they recorded on for new programming to save money on buying tapes. When they started to think about the preservation of news and shows like Dr. Who, they had to turn to the general public and ask them to donate any recordings that they might have made.

It's estimated that more than 50% of all video games are lost forever because companies didn't care to save a master copy, and this has already come back to bite some of these companies in the ass with the recent trend of remakes and remasters. There was a recent remake of one of the GTA games from the early 2000s that was very poorly received, and it turned out that the company who worked on it only had the mobile phone port of the game to work with because Rockstar hadn't bothered to keep a master copy of the game. There was another recent remake of a game that was very obviously done using a pirated copy of the game as the source, because they hadn't even bothered to remove the cracker's logo from the game.

With examples like that and Sony recently removing thousands of people's access to music and movies that they bought on basically a whim, it's pretty clear that preservation efforts will be done in spite of companies rather than helped by them. And so that means copies of things will be one random harddrive failure of some single person on the internet away from disappearing forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Certain types of tweets tend to go away more often than others. More than 40% of tweets written in Turkish or Arabic are no longer visible on the site within three months of being posted.

I've read this is a major problem in Facebook as well, they lack good moderation for these languages and especially the Arabic script and so just remove things heavy handedly to be safe.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

If Ian's shoelace site dissapears, I'ma bounce too.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
580 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

55643 readers
3886 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS