this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
521 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5463 readers
1638 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 123 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

Also that argument is dead on arrival because they expect you and businesses and the entire city to pack up and leave as if it would cost nothing. They also have literally said “just sell your house and move” but like TO WHO?! Who would buy that house if it’s in such a fucked area?!

If anyone ever says “just move” you know they have zero concept of the word “community” or “moving costs” or “nuance”. They just don’t want to address the cause of the problem because they’re, at best, cowards.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

If its our area (Flordia coast)... that's not a problem.

Buyers don't care. They don't know squat about flooding or hurricanes, they just come in from out of state and get dazzled by the realtor and the weather and everything and buy.

Our housing market was so crazy houses were being auctioned left and right. Market value just keeps going up, even on the coast.

TL;DR if the area is superficially attractive enough, home buyers are idiots. I realize this is probably not the case in Georgia mountains, but it his here, and its enabling a vicious cycle where builders keep building homes in obvious flood zones, where they absolutely shouldn't.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

That doesn't fix the problem, it just changes who has the problem. Though I'll admit that idiots buying bad stuff from other idiots in a cycle until eventually one idiot gets their life totally ruined feels a little on the nose.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago

They also have literally said “just sell your house and move” but like TO WHO?! Who would buy that house if it’s in such a fucked area?!

You have to sell the story that the area is a conservative utopia where people can live free of wokeness.

Then the conservative refugees from the satanic, communist areas will flock to you to buy your land.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 82 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Sell their house to who Ben?

(For the uninitiated https://youtu.be/RLqXkYrdmjY)

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 hours ago

I will never not laugh at that. He spends so long chopping with the axe, and then drops the punchline. It's perfect.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 31 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget the Submariner and Namor

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Comic and MCU separately

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago

Haha I literally had Ben written in but opted to remove it. Fuck Ben Shapiro.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Broad brushes don’t work. I moved out of country in my early twenties. Moved back home in my mid twenties, then proceeded to move to three different coasts over the course of the next decade, selling two homes and most belongings in the process before ultimately moving to an inland city that’s a fourteen hour drive from where I grew up and knew nobody (I’ve been here nearly twenty years now). If the area goes to hell then yeah, I’ll scope out job options and quality of life in other locations, sell my house and unnecessary belongings, and move my boys and I. It isn’t nearly as difficult as people flap about. Staying somewhere until theirs no longer a buyers market is short sighted similar to people refusing to leave Biloxi when it was certain to be destroyed (one of the places I moved out of) and folks deserve what they get if they refuse to leave. I’d love for us to fix the climate and socioeconomic issues so difficult decisions didn’t need to be made but people burying their heads in the sand and refusing to look out for themselves and their family in response to global and societal issues will never make sense to me. Control what you can control but recognize what you don’t control and adapt. If folks aren’t going to take responsibility for the things they can control I don’t see any reason to fret about the things outside of their control negatively impacting them.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

I mean, you're the one who bought it currently, just find an equal or dumber person like yourself, bam. Simple. At its core, this is basically how all products are sold.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago

That’s funny and I’m sure you know this but for purposes of discussion -

Think about a couple common examples:

I would pay like a thousand dollars not to wash clothes by hand for a few years.

You see washing machines are like $500-$1000, you buy, you’re happy.

I’d pay five bucks to have a sweet dark tasting liquid in my mouth and not be as tired.

Cha-ching, Starbucks makes a sale.

So even rational consumers often make purchases when their expected utility/satisfaction exceeds the monetary cost.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You’ve completely missed the point about community, eh? And you know people don’t get to pick where they’re born or where their extended family lives, right? So they get born into these places and get locked down for whatever reason and can’t leave. Certainly they can’t all leave in one perfect unit all at the same time.

Also that’s not how all products are sold, holy shit. Maybe certain drop shippers, sure, but that’s not how it works.

I can tell you the other thing people do as they grow up and that is develop their own views. Growing up in Texas, I didn't realize anything was wrong or out of the ordinary politically/ideologivally. My parents had their views which initially became my views since that was what was normal in my family and community

Getting older and more mature, I realized I didn't agree with my state or parents but I also didn't have the option to pack up and leave. By the time I was able to sustain myself and build a life, I had already gotten a job, a relationship, and wanted to start building my own family. Doing that meant staying where I was since my in-laws were in the same city and my spouse didn't want to be away from them.

Even if on paper to some people it is as easy as just sell your house and leave there are complicating factors. I don't want my kids to have to deal with hurricanes, power grid failures, intolerance of others, and everything else Texas has to "offer" but at the same time, its not so easy to just bail and start again.

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Dude it's just moving, it's not that hard. People do it multiple times in their lives. Relax.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Moving is expensive. At this point I think most people are living paycheck to paycheck.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Ben Shapiro is never going to get rid of hus beach house, is he?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

At its core, this is basically how all products are sold.

Imagine being so neck deep in the scam economy that you don't even remember that products that aren't scams exist.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The problem is a town was built where there should not be one. Flood plains WILL flood. Rebuilding is pointless. It will just be destroyed again. At some point we have to cut our losses.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

“A” town didn’t flood, there’s wreckage across the entire southeast. It’s not because people in the south are too stupid to know where to build, it’s because climate change is making hurricanes stronger further inland, resulting in century and thousand year floods happening.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

It's both - yes, places are getting hit with types and scales of natural disasters they could not have anticipated, but they're also rebuilding in places that will get hit hardest when they do it again

Consider the idea of a 100 year standard - you're building to the level where it won't hold up to the storm of a lifetime. Let alone the fact that storms keep getting worse... It boggles my mind

[–] bashbeerbash@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

A drought in south america has caused out of control wildfires that dumped 210 megatons of CO2 in the atmosphere, this year alone.

That's just from wildfires in one continent. Now add it to all the CO2 produced in one year.

The runaway effects are becoming more evident and unfortunately people will have to finally give up on huge swaths of land or be killed. Save the planet, hang a CEO

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

And those type of floods will only increase in frequency. This is the new normal. People will need to move if they don't want to be rebuilding every couple years.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Move where? Are you suggesting we just abandon everywhere within hundreds of miles of the coast? People living hundreds of miles inland and not in a flood plain are affected by this as well. Look at an elevation map of North Carolina, and then tell me which side you think would be safer to be on: the side with mountains, or the low lying side by the ocean?

Because it was the western part of NC that got fucking wrecked. Suggesting that people should have foreseen this as inevitable when they chose to be born into communities that have been in the same place for literally hundreds of years without experiencing floods on this level is unrealistic, as is expecting people to just up and move with money they may not have to places where they have no community.

Expecting that we can just offload the price of climate disasters on those affected by going "oh well you should have just lived somewhere else" isn't just inhumane, it's ostrich head in sand behavior. Your community isn't safe from climate change, either. You better hope people haven't run out of empathy by the time you or your family need help.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Hah and abandon NYC, Boston, DC, SF, LA, Sydney, plus entire countries like Holland, the UK, India with its billion people, etc? This is madness. There is nowhere safe to go and the numbers of people to be displaced are staggering

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

On top of what the other person said people still need to live in those places. It is actually crazy to say that the entire south-eastern seaboard of the United States should just be permanently evacuated wholesale. We could slow, or even stop, a lot of this by just admitting that climate change is real and doing something about it and it would be a helluva lot cheaper than turning several states in ghost towns.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 43 minutes ago

During the pandemic, Trump dragged his feet in developing a response to it - leaked conversations mentioned how individual #1 liked the fact that it was primarily affecting highly liberal areas such as NYC and LA, while leaving conservative strongholds such as Idaho and Utah alone, and had asked about delaying the federal response a bit so as to let the people in the former stew in it a bit more, for his political advantage.

Also I note that that same individual #1 was in charge of nationwide disaster recovery efforts - even going so far as to take the binders of ready-made plans and throw them into the garbage.

So this whole "it is not the job of the government to use its tax collected revenue to take care of We The People" is very much by design. i.e. not merely a factual matter but a political one, in having to choose between deeper tax breaks for the wealthy vs. preparedness. And Individual #1 made that choice, in conjunction with Congress, that now applies to us all.

In fact, the former swing state turned Republican stronghold NC is one of the very reasons why climate change is hitting us so strong and fast, unprepared and seemingly even unawares.

Perhaps "admitting that climate change is real and doing something about it" is something that NC will now change its mind about, so that the federal government can do differently?

But I somewhat doubt it. It is very hard to help someone who seems dead set against being helped, nor allowing the rest of us to help ourselves as well (see e.g. medically necessary abortions).

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm not saying to abandon the whole southeast, but something in the range of 15 million US homes are built in flood plains. A large portion of these are in Texas and Florida. It is absolute madness to keep building and rebuilding in these areas.

Even if we drop global CO² emissions to zero tomorrow, it will take more than a century to even begin to see trends reverse. In the mean time lowland areas will continue to flood over and over.