this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
496 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26174 readers
3472 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That the movie fails the Bechdel test is bad enough, but that it completely misses the mark on the Ulvæus test as well is utterly unforgivable.

[–] Aremel@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I like your funny words, magic man. Can you explain them?

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

The Bechdel test is a famous test of film to measure whether a movie represents women as more than just accessories for the male cast. Specifically, the test is passed if a film features two women who have a conversation about something other than a man. Surprisingly, a lot of films fail this test.

The Ulvaeus test is a fictional test in the same vein named after Bjorn Ulvaeus, a prominent member of the band ABBA. Presumably, this test might be passed if a film contains a musical segment featuring the works of the band ABBA. This would be a clever pairing for this film, as ABBA has a song called Waterloo and the Napoleonic Wars ended with the Battle of Waterloo.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The Bechdel test is a famous test of film to measure whether a movie represents women as more than just accessories for the male cast. Specifically, the test is passed if a film features two women who have a conversation about something other than a man. Surprisingly, a lot of films fail this test.

It isn't surprising for a few reasons.

  1. A lot of movies, which the test highlights, have female characters that are not really fleshed out because of sexism. They only exist for the real characters, the men!
  2. A lot of movies don't have female characters because of the setting, like The Shawshank Redemption. An all men's prison just isn't going to have women in it. Small cast movies in similar all male settings are also not surprising to fail the test.
  3. Some movies are all about a main character and there aren't scenes that don't discuss the main character. So a conversation that doesn't include the main character would be forced in just to meet the test.

Now, while it isn't surprising that a lot of movies fail the test, the real purpose of the test is to show how all three types of movies are massively over represented in the number of movies made. #3 is an issue overall because of how the vast majority of main characters are men and not women. #2 is an issue overall because of how many movies there are about all male settings. It highlights the overall trend that main characters are men and the movies are all about the men, and wouldn't be an issue if there were just as many movies about women or with casts that only include women. The Descent stands out with all characters being women because that is very rare!

So if a single movie fails the test because of the setting or small cast, it isn't necessarily a bad thing. If there is a diverse cast, but the women are not fleshed out then it is an issue. If a movie could have included women, but they were too lazy to do so and to give them characterization, then it is an issue.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Napoleonic Wars

How many people in history have given their name to a whole series of wars?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago

Alexander and uhh

Probably some Asian dudes?

[–] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The others have explained it better than I ever could, but I'd like to add that I haven't even checked whether Napoleon fails the Bechdel test. I'm reasonably certain that the Ulvæus test is bullshit, because I just made it up.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The Bechdel test is if a movie is able to have two female characters having a conversation with one another about any topic other than a man. A surprising amount of media fails this test.

Björn Ulvaeus is a member of Swedish supergroup ABBA and one of the composers of the ABBA song Waterloo, which is about the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte at the Battle of Waterloo.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/3Dc_cnj1PEc?si=MBjn-ymyYEs2CDB6

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Why do all movies have to be 2+ hours these days?

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

More ad breaks for eventual streaming service distribution. Two hours? Only 4-5 ad breaks. An additional 20 minutes? Boom, let's sell more prescription drugs, or candy, or whatever.

[–] jaidyn999@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Its because of the way they are funded.

Films are funded through venture capital, and investors are looking for the biggest profit. So modest films struggle to get funding, because investors believe size=quality.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right? And it's worse than that. I was going to finally sit down and watch the Across the Spider-Verse movie now that it's on Netflix because it's almost 2 hours and 20 minutes long and if I couldn't take sitting there, I could at least take a break. But then someone who saw it told me it isn't even the whole story and you have to wait for a sequel coming out who knows when which will also probably be that long. I can't take it. At least give movies an intermission like they used to.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Without any spoilers, I felt that the spider-verse movie was enjoyable on it's own. Where the plot ended was, at least to me, in a good enough spot where I was both extremely satisfied with the movie I just watched and excited for the next film.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'll bear that in mind if I do decide to sit down and watch it. I was going to do it with my daughter, but she has ADHD and both can't handle a film that long and also has an annoying habit of saying she wants to watch the rest later and never agrees to watch it when I suggest it later multiple times. I may have to watch it secretly without her.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know the academy like dramas but I would rather watch a satirical biopic, "weird al" style, that a 3 hour long boring history class

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"history class", the director was called out for historical inaccuracies and his reaction was "lol, I don't give a fuck"

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 9 months ago

Not giving a fuck would be a valid attitude if the inaccuracies made a better movie. Judging by the reviews, it didn't.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if a French director made a movie about Queen Elizabeth II but made a her a slutty party girl who fucked Prime Ministers on the side. Anglos are masters of slander.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, Napoleon was a bit of a whore, it's a fact.

Also had a thing for milfs.

[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Also had a thing for milfs.

Joséphine was 6 years older than Napoleon. Yet Ridley Scott managed to cast an actress 14 years younger than Joaquin Phoenix to play her role.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Sounds like my kind of guy.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So an accurate biopic on the life of Big Liz then?

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I absolutely listened to that song on the way home after.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Youre the Duke of Wellington

You've been fighting Nepoleon for hours since the morning.

Your mish mash of coalition forces have been doing surprisingly well, but Nepolean has finally committed his veteran troops to push your center. You're holding well but it's only a matter of time before it collapses.

Then, thousands of troops begin to appear in the distance

The frech begin to cheer as they think its Grouchy who has returned to reinforce the main force.

But you know better.

One of your lieutenants puts down his viewing scope and says to you "Sir, it seems our friends have arrived. Shall I make preparations?"

You nod.

The lieutenant calmly walks over to the hi-fi system, inserts a cassette and hits play. Suddenly Swedish synth-pop starts blasting from your speakers and floods the battlefield 🎵 MY MY 🎵

A faint smile breaks across your face.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not even a version of Waterloo by that one Hungarian lady choir?