this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
124 points (88.3% liked)

Asklemmy

47087 readers
1418 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 71 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Take a look at this page, it'll give you not only your answer but explain how to solve it

https://mathematicsart.com/solved-exercises/solution-find-the-distance-bc-quarter-circle/

[–] Cyniez@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Thanks a lot

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dude so smart i was already breaking out the angles and testing everything out

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is the worst way to go about doing it, because you should never assume a drawing is made to scale unless it is specifically marked as such. A protractor would be useless if the drawing isn’t to scale. Generally speaking, if a problem isn’t drawn to scale, it’s because all of the info you need to solve it is already present in the drawing. You don’t need to bust out the protractor to measure angles, because the angles can either be calculated from the available info, or aren’t needed in the first place.

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

I meant more like trying to use cos tan sin and the pythogoras thing not actually measuring it by hand haha

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 47 points 6 days ago

OP sneakily making Lemmy do their homework, well played.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 49 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 69 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Note that the problem states that the outer shape is a quarter circle, information not provided in OP's question.

Knowing it is a quarter circle is important because it allows us to validate that the bottom-right angle is 90 degrees.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

I actually came to the comments to see if we had this information! Thanks.

[–] gezginorman@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but does it have to be a given, or can we actually prove that it has to be

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 18 points 6 days ago

It has to be given, otherwise there would be infinitely many solutions.

You would need some other information to link the line segment X to the rest of the figure.

[–] olosta@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The explanation don't explain why AE must be a diameter of the circle. What makes that obvious?

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How have I had years of math and not seen this? I mean, it’s not super useful for me, but I would have thought I would have seen something like this in pre calculus at least.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Geometry, class six or seven.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I teach this to my grade 9 class in Canada. It’s on the curriculum.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nice. I have no recollection of seeing this before.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Tbf most Canadian grade 9 teachers skip it.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Wow, that's cool

[–] newnton@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Tats so cool! Did you just do that or find it?

[–] double_quack@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sequence of lines to focus on to get to the answer

making the BOLD ASSUMPTION that the angle of the arch is 90deg (the bottom right corner of your diagram), then the dashed lines will lead you to the value of the bold line.

If the original assumption is correct, then the answer is 15.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 days ago

Jesus.

Jesus is always the answer

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

if we assume the bottom right corner is a right angle and is the center of the arc, then it is solvable in the manners that others here have already described. if either of those is not the case, and the image itself doesn't state, then there is insufficient information to solve it.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Spent too long trying to figure out if this was loss or not.

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Well? Is it?

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

24 and 7 make a pythagorean triple with 25 as the hypotenuse. If the problem uses one pythagorean triple, it probably uses another, so I assume x is 15, and the radius is 20.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Not the most complete answer, but definitely the fastest one^^

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well the drawing is wrong. I measured it with a ruler and it should be 9

Ok, but what does a well have to do with that?

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] murd0x@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

Hello dumb! I'm dad

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I assume you need to calculate the red triangle's hypotenuse but it seems like there are too many degrees of freedom to lock down any of the other sides or angles of the triangle including X unless I'm missing some hack involving chords and reflected angles.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 3 points 6 days ago

Try to draw a full semicircle and extend the 7 units long red line, you will notice it falls on the other corner of the semicircle. In fact, every way of drawing two segments from a semicircle corner to the same point if the circumference forms a right triangle.

Now, on the original figure, draw the hypotenuse of the red triangle, you will notice the hypotenuse is as long as the extension you draw earlier, because both start from the same height and fall on a corner of the same semicircle. That means that you can find the extension by calculating the hypotenuse.

Now, you can calculate 7+extension to get the cathetes of the extended triangle, and it's hypotenuse is the diameter of the semicircle. You can divide the diameter by two to get the radius.

Now, you notice that: X, the radius, and the red hypotenuse form a right triangle, and you know the length of the red hypotenuse and of the radius, so you can find X.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 11 points 6 days ago

Try to draw a full semicircle and extend the 7 units long red line, you will notice it falls on the other corner of the semicircle. In fact, every way of drawing two segments from a semicircle corner to the same point if the circumference forms a right triangle.

Now, on the original figure, draw the hypotenuse of the red triangle, you will notice the hypotenuse is as long as the extension you draw earlier, because both start from the same height and fall on a corner of the same semicircle. That means that you can find the extension by calculating the hypotenuse.

Now, you can calculate 7+extension to get the cathetes of the extended triangle, and it's hypotenuse is the diameter of the semicircle. You can divide the diameter by two to get the radius.

Now, you notice that: X, the radius, and the red hypotenuse form a right triangle, and you know the length of the red hypotenuse and of the radius, so you can find X.

[–] renormalizer@feddit.org 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

x = 15

Denote the origin of the circle O and the points A, B, C clockwise starting from the left. From the isosceles triangle OAB we get 2 r sin(alpha/2) = 24, where alpha is the angle between OA and OB.

Construct the line orthogonal to OB that goes through C. The length of the line, h, between C and the intersection is h = 7 sin(beta) = x sin(90 - alpha). Denote the lengths of the parts of OB a and b, where a is connected to B. We have a + b = r

Use Thales circle theorem to find that the triangle ABA' completes the red shape, with A' on the circle opposite to A. That means that the angle between A'A and A'B is alpha/2, but A'OB is also an isosceles triangle. So the angle on the other side, beta, has to be the same. Thus, beta = alpha/2.

Now, put everything together: a = 7 cos (alpha/2), b = h cot(90 - alpha) = 7 sin(alpha/2) tan(alpha), r = 12 / sin(alpha/2).

a + b = r <=> cos(alpha/2) sin(alpha/2) + sin^2(alpha/2) tan(alpha) = 12 / 7

1/2 sin(alpha) + 1/2(1 - cos(alpha)) tan(alpha) = 12/7 <=> tan(alpha) = 24/7

From the identity for h we know that x = 7 sin(alpha/2) / cos(alpha). Insert alpha = arctan(24/7)

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I'ma go with 8 because it's slightly longer than 7

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Meskale@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago
[–] delusion@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Draw a symmetrical thingy, the calculations are then simple. I'll let you figure out on your own what calculation is connected with what geometry:

sqrt(24^2+7^2) = 25

25 + 7 = 32

sqrt(32^2+24^2)=40

40/2=20

x = sqrt(25^2-20^2)=15

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Shouldn't the person who to lazy to measure x solve this?