this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
170 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

60506 readers
4204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

Please criticize the us government for this as hard as I have been criticizing China for locking it's citizens out of the world stage with their "great firewall".

Or don't, it's not like hypocrisy doesn't get enshrined and worshipped here lmfaoooo

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

They're shutting down instead of blocking new downloads, seems like a stunt. But the blocking of new downloads is obviously happening if SCOTUS doesn't step in...that's the law. That's just what the law says.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

get a vpn (that isn't proton) now people cause it'll only get worse

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How come not proton? Did they get caught with their hands in the ~~cookie jar~~ traffic logs?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

CEO honestly thinks Trump and the Republicans are going to go after tech monopolies. Either he's detached from reality or he's trying to keep them from coming after Proton by cooperating. Either way is not great.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 hours ago

and cozying up to american gov no matter who it is just gives me bad vibes that they would happily turn over anything they want when asked

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 18 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Zuckerberg is behind it, just like he was when they banned it on India. Politicians get what they want by eliminating a company that doesn't support them, Meta gets more usershare in the U.S. they can control the narrative and keep their guys in place so they don't get regulated and they get more tax breaks.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

In other words, the US government exists solely to serve its wealthiest constituents.

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Meanwhile China says no American internet sites in their country and I guess that’s ok for some reason.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

who said it was ok?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 5 hours ago

It's ok because USA is doing it too. Every state, every politician is basically the same. It's all about violent control of the planet. These apps are just the tip of the iceberg.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They are going to ban themselves as protest for banning them..?

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Essentially yea, the laws enforcement mechanism as-is is just having the app delisted from app stores

Everything else is of TikToks own doing

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A shutdown would be preferable than a sale of the active app and userbase to Elon no?

[–] murmelade@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

No. Elon would turn it into a far-right platform, like he did with xitter, and thereby accelerating Americas downfall.

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

First time in years I see something not bad happen in the US

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

Imagine cheering on your own imprisonment.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You're not looking very closely then

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You got some suggestions on where to look? We're speedrunning the fall of rome over here, it's pretty much to the point that even hope is an unreasonable thing to hope for...

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 7 points 18 hours ago

I meant the claim that this was somehow a good thing, and not a performative "anti-china" bill that was really about cutting out the young people's current venue for organizing against the wealthy's interests, like their criticisms of the genocide in Gaza. China will still get all that info by buying it off the hundred other apps that collect it. If they cared about the data collection, they'd have addressed all data collection.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

Yes TikTok, that’s what a ban is.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

I'm surprised they're taking that approach rather than pushing the web version.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Yeah this just sounds like compliance with the media making it seem like a protest for clicks...

load more comments
view more: next ›