this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
747 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@lemmy.today 148 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I mean, some of those EOLed nearly a decade ago.

You can argue over what a reasonable EOL is, but all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn't going to keep getting updates.

Throw enough money at a vendor, and I'm sure that you can get extended support contracts that will keep it going for however long people are willing to keep chucking money at a vendor -- some businesses pay for support on truly ancient hardware -- but this is a consumer broadband router. It's unlikely to make a lot of sense to do so on this -- the hardware isn't worth much, nor is it going to be terribly expensive to replace, and especially if you're using the wireless functionality, you probably want support for newer WiFi standards anyway that updated hardware will bring.

I do think that there's maybe a good argument that EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way. Like, maybe hardware should ship with an EOL sticker, so that someone can glance at hardware and see if it's "expired". Or maybe network hardware should have some sort of way of reporting EOL in response to a network query, so that someone can audit a network for EOLed hardware.

But EOLing hardware is gonna happen.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (3 children)

all hardware is going to EOL at some point, and at that point, it isn't going to keep getting updates

EOLing hardware should be handled in a better way

Both of these are solved by one thing: open platforms. If I can flash OpenWRT on to an older router then it becomes useful again.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bingo.

Either support the device until the heat death of the universe, or provide consumers with the access to maintain it themselves.

[–] Damn990099@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But neither of those help corporations make them all the money. So we need regulation to force them to.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Regulation? I think you mean "guillotines"...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Definitely don’t this in the past (Linksys WRT54G!) but let’s be honest, the kind of people running 10yo Dlink routers aren’t going to flash new firmware, let alone OpenWRT or even know to look for it. It would have to come that way from the factory. And even then I doubt most people even do regular updates, sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YaksDC@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the correct reaction to old home equipment.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Right?

Something this old is going to be power inefficient compared to newer stuff, and simply not perform as well.

I would know, I just booted up a 10 year old consumer router last night, because the current one died. It'll be OK for a few days until I can get a replacement. Boy, is this thing slow.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shininghero@pawb.social 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there should be a handoff procedure, or whatever you want to call it.

As EOL approaches, work with whatever open router OS maker is available (currently OpenWRT) to make sure it's supported, and configs migrate over nicely. Then drop one last update, designed to do a full OS replacement.

Boom, handoff complete.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I’d support a regulation that defines either an expiration date or commitment to open source at the time the hardware is sold.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

EoL of anything should mean open source code. You don't want to open source your code? Then you must keep servicing your products and must keep your servers up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

When the users are in control of the software running on their devices then "EOL" is dependent the user community's willingness to work on it themselves.

[–] art@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I can still use a 2003 AMD Opteron with the newest builds of Linux. It's an open standard. As long as the hardware still physically works. The only reason these pieces of hardware are EOL is because they chose to lock them down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree. Buy a new router that isn't Dlink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The DSR-150 is still being sold on Amazon under the D-Link store. Why the hell would you end of life something you still sell.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago

Don't want to get lumbered with a bunch of old stock now, do you?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay so the 2015 EOL ones, yeah I can understand telling the customer to update their shit. They shouldn't have to support nearly 10 year out of date stuff.

May 2024 EOL ones? Bruh. C'mon now.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

I would love to know when they stopped selling it compared to the EOL. EOL should be at least 5 years past the last time the models were shipped out, maybe more. So if May 2024 was EOL I sure hope they weren't selling them after 2018.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Be nice if companies had to open source firmware they are going to EoL.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Be nice?

It must become.law. we want to lower e-waste? Yen if companies stop supporting their products, het must open source all of it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not going to hold my breath that anything like this will happen in the current political climate, but yeah, that should be mandatory. Even ignoring the exploitive nature towards their customers, it creates a ton of unnecessary waste.

Exactly. As a consumer, when I buy a product, I'm not just buying the state of things at the time, I'm buying with an expectation of ongoing support. If they choose to not support it themselves, I should be able to support it myself.

In the old days, hardware came with schematics, so when the manufacturer warranty ended, customers could repair things themselves. That should extend to software as well, since software is just as much a part of the functioning of a device as capacitors and whatnot.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There right you and i should just buy a new one

Of a diffrent brand

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Welp never buying anything D-Link ever again

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Long ago, D-Link was good but then they sold the company. Just like Alienware, Farbreware, Oaklies, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 32 points 1 month ago (5 children)

don't buy shit unless it runs openwrt or whatever

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Our shit sucks. Buy more lol

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

there should be list of companies that should be avoided and why, its impossible to keep track of everything like this

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An idea for an app I came up with for a class once was one that let you scan a barcode of a product in like Walmart and get what parent company owns it, like how Nestle doesn't like to put their name on companies they bought (or not in big text anyways).
So if you want to avoid Coca Cola you could scan it and see who it's owned by and if that company matches one of the ones you have blacklisted

Fun fact, 'peace tea' is owned by coca cola

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago

There's an app called 'buycott' that does exactly that!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I mean this is pretty standard in all industries regardless of whether it's a software flaw or a physical flaw in any other kind of product. What's the likelihood of a vacuum manufacturer replacing a part in a 15 year old product that had a 1 year warrantee even if it's a safety issue? Sure the delivery and installation is cheaper with software, but the engineering and development isn't, especially if the environment for building it has to be recreated.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago (12 children)

I work for a manufacturer with part catalogues going back to 1921, and while the telegraph codes no longer work, you could absolutely still order up a given part, or request from us the engineering diagram for it to aid in fabricating a replacement. You can also request service manuals, wiring diagrams, etc. Don't all half-decent manufacturers do this?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Don't all half-decent manufacturers do this?

No. That is phenomenally uncommon. To the point it's almost unheard of.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 month ago

Yes they do, but half decent manufacturers are extremely rare.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (10 children)

This is why a number of countries have laws saying spare parts must be made available for a number of years past being sold. Well beyond what the warranty is.

How is this significantly different?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What you're saying is perfectly reasonable, but also doesn't apply here because they're still selling this router new on the D-link Amazon store.

If you're going to stop supporting a product, you should also stop selling it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

but does it run openwrt?

e: no it doesn't, only one model had half-baked image made and available for download from some sketchy forum post made in 2014

[–] viking@infosec.pub 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Can highly recommend ASUS, most of their models can be flashed with custom firmware that is supported beyond EOL. And their EOL cycle is also pretty long.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I moved to an OPNsense router a couple of years ago and I’ve never looked back. Hell is shitty consumer routers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Cool, so what brand is a good one to replace D-Link with?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Commodity hardware & open source software for the win.

When my Western Digital NAS was never going to get critical security patches, I was so freaking glad to find out that they just used software raid... I threw the HDDs in a Debian server and never looked back.

It's certainly nice to have things that are turn-key, but if you can find your way around any OS, just avoid proprietary everything.

load more comments
view more: next ›