sunbeam60

Correct.

Ah, Mr Donning Kruger, it’s nice to meet you.

Barely usable results?! Whatever you may think of the pricing (which is obviously below cost), there are an enormous amount of fields where language models provide insane amount of business value. Whether that translates into a better life for the everyday person is currently unknown.

You will be kept alive at subsistence level to buy the stuff you’ve been told to buy, don’t worry.

Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure.

Ah yes, like how “fusion” somehow isn’t “nuclear”.

Ethics.

Which is to say not a lot.

But it’s not really a practical attack vector, if you’re worried about weaponisation. Simpler to just dump VX into the air.

Did you actually read the article? They don’t upload screenshots; they recognise content and upload the identification of that content.

I hold a very strong hypothesis, which I’ve not seen any data contradict yet, that intelligence is only possible with formal language and symbolics and therefore formal language and intelligence is very hard to separate. I don’t think one created the other; they evolved together.

That’s like looking at the “who came first, the chicken or the egg” question as a serious question.

Who says loan? You could get a bunch of PE involved; they love a smashing together of entities to “create synergies” and “increase pricing power”.

I mean, yes, as I’m sure you know already. Flightgear is a fine product and lots of respect to the contributors, but the support around MSFS, the level of detail and whole host of other factors make MSFS the one to beat; even if the flight model of XPlane is probably a tad better.