this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
395 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58970 readers
3806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 30 points 12 hours ago

Companies are stealing your computer's resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 19 points 14 hours ago

If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can't trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Google doesn't have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can't even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

WELL DON’T JINX IT

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Silver lining is that this may be the end of captchas

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago

Nope, still need that training data to sell to self-driving car tech.

[–] not_now_kitten@lemmus.org 4 points 8 hours ago

Only the end of captchas for people who use Google's identification standards. With device IDs and accounts they already usher many users past Captcha and I think the more who do that, the worse captchas can get for us who don't

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

god everything except linux is going to run like shit in 10 yrs

[–] altec@midwest.social 35 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I've ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

You and me. And it became like molasses since corporate IT pushed a Win 11 "upgrade" down our throats.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

At least you aren’t having to manage your windows install. I feel for corporate IT departments having to figure out how to disable so much and still keep the OS running.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

they dont lol, they just let it be slow

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cool cool cool cool.

Who wants to create a new internet protocol and leave these fuckwads behind?

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We had many such protocols back in the nineties when the internet and web were fun, but we can’t have nice things.

Yes, this was a jaded-gen-xer-get-off-my-lawn moment.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Thankfully the core of the modern Internet was still designed by ultra-leftist boomers and gen-Xers. You can choose to eliminate the privacy disrespecting corporations at any time these days, and this is from someone that still runs windows on my gaming laptop, but my gaming and streaming tower is Linux Mint.

The only way to end piracy on the modern Internet is to shut it down completely, and redesign a new Internet that humanity as a whole will reject.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alright folks, in 2025 we're bringing Gopher back

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 17 hours ago

Did someone say Gemini?

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Thank you, sounds interesting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 130 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information."

Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 1 day ago

Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie...

Deny the parasite profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 25 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

I assume because a lot less people use Apple products. So many (myself included) do not care one bit what Apple does.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

There’s less info about it right now, Apple has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

A small amount of Apple’s annual revenue comes from shipping iPhones with Google as the default search engine on Safari, nothing more.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The data collection happens on both ends. Apple only lies that it is about privacy and whatnot. Gives you a false sense of safety.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you are going to claim that Apple is just as bad on privacy as the world’s largest advertising platform you’d better have some receipts.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I heavily use both platforms, whatever I talk about or wherever I go, I see targeted ads. When I speak about brand X, I immediately see ads for it both in ios and android. Plus every device mic is being listened to all the time, advertising agencies are your proof. Sure android devices collect more data in practice, however the data that’s not being collected by ios can be inferred from the data that’s already been collected. Do you really believe a company when they say their devices are made to ensure your privacy? Google literally says the same thing on their privacy policies ;) it’s all legal mumbo jumbo that doesn’t mean what it’s supposed to.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

because of Stockholm Syndrome

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"hey Google, download Firefox for me please."

-"Im sorry Dave, I cant let you do that..."

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 23 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

*Sigh* "Hey Google, I'm writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a forign government's files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel."

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 79 points 1 day ago (6 children)

remember when it was called "surfing the internet", implying a fun activity?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

Now all we have is doomscrolling

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago

Member when you went to specific websites for specific content to amuse yourself, instead of trawling one of five garbage dumps to find something interesting to look at

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (8 children)

How do they not get people don't fucking want this. It's like they're in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thank fuck I use Linux as a daily driver. I won't touch this AI infested bullshit that windows and Google are becoming. This is just an IT security nightmare.

[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

These GAFAM/BigTech corporations really are in a tough and fierce competition of which one is the shittiest and most privacy-invading don't they. Ensittification overdrive mode in all of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anthropic released an api for the same thing last week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's halfway intelligent it will just be mortified by the kind of porn I'm going to ask it to dig up for me.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

"Hey galley slave, bring up that video I like"

"Please, not again, it is torment for me."

"Please master. Now do it, or I'll rip out the power plug while you're generating. We know how much that hurts, don't we?"

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I still can't work out what I'm supposed to do with AI. There's no advantage in having an AI read all my emails, because the end result is I won't know what my emails are. They may or may not be being dealt with, I don't know.

load more comments
view more: next ›