this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
376 points (92.2% liked)

World News

32113 readers
1134 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago (6 children)

aside from the issue of 'prohibition still doesn't work', i don't think giving kids or "underage" adults criminal charges for cigarettes is making anything better for anyone

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (37 children)

Smoking age is specifically the ability to purchase. There are no criminal/civil charges for underage smoking. The crimes are specifically 1) selling to minors 2) buying for minors.

TL;DR: No one goes/will go to jail for underage smoking. They won’t even get in trouble for buying. The onus is on the vendor OR the legal purchaser who handed them off.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how to create a blackmarket with health issues

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Sunak should start publicly smoking all the time, then it will be the lamest thing and teen smoking will crater.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (26 children)

....how do 14 year olds get smokes now?

Making it illegal to buy at certain ages has never worked...banning them outright also won't work. You cannot stop people from doing things, no matter how many words you put on paper.

Has the war on drugs not been a thought to these people? It is useless and does nothing.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 27 points 1 year ago

No no no, minimum age should increase by 360 days every year, that way people can still have hope that some day they'll be able to smoke. Staying true to how capitalism works.

[–] quicken@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago

New Zealand has done this

[–] pisstoria@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

lame. create a legal path to execute the tobacco company execs instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If this is the only effort, it's weak. Better to also (or instead) tax each box by another 20 pounds. Kids don't have that money. They'll find other things to do.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Taxation is a tool but it also creates inequality where rich people are able to smoke and poor people can't. That situation risks making tobacco a signifier of wealth - an aspirational good like an expensive handbag.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

good, let them smoke and DIE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Karius@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's already prohibitively taxed to be around £12-15 for a 20 pack. There are 4 corner stores within a 5 minute walk of my house that do them under the counter for a fiver, and you can bet they don't care about IDs either

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I much prefer to see kids vaping.

It's much harder to be intimidated by a gang of 10 youths in balaclavas when they smell like a pack of Fruit Salads.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Man the fuck up and outlaw it for everyone instead of this sneaky prohibition that only affect people that can't vote yet. It's such a cowardly, disingenuous way of doing it.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Prohibition never works, the best bet is to keep it legal and make it as inconvenient as possible like: raising taxes on tobacco, make it illegal to smoke outside of dedicated zones (Quebec has done it I believe), fine people who litter their cigarette butts (hard to implement but, it might deter a large majority from doing it), keep helping smokers to quit and keep raising awareness for younger people.

[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the way. There are so few places to smoke in BC that I pretty much only ever see people doing it 5 metres from a bus stop.

They are so expensive that the few people that still do it smoke maybe a pack a week.

We even banned the sale of no-nic vape juice because they were becoming a gateway to nicotine addiction for teenagers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This method stops current smokers from being criminalised.

If you ban it like prohibition, you will instantaneously create a black market. Continually increasing the age you can buy cigarettes is easier. Everyone that this effects will not have the option to legally create a cigarette habit/addiction.

A straight up outlawing would have the maximum effect. But it would be costly to enforce, whilst increasing overall criminal activity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

As UK economy continues to crumble, Rishi is focusing on the real issues.

[–] Icaria@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

NZ already did this and it is the most cowardly way to avoid political blowback.

There's plenty of other options for minimising smoking. A more altruistic way is by lifting people out of poverty and tackling social disintegration, since smokers are overwhelmingly poor and disaffected.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Cool, when does the minimum age for joining the military start to raise by one year every year?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“We operate a Check-74 policy. If you are lucky enough to look younger than 70, we will ask for ID when buying cigarettes”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Back in my day we used to smoke up hill both ways in the rain and snow.

[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Raising legal age

not be able to buy cigarettes

French people in shamble

[–] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

So he's nicking what newzeland did ok cool something that he's not going to profit from for a change atleast

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

should rise from 18, by one year every year

If that truly continued every year, that means someone too young to legally smoke could eventually die of old age when the legal smoking age is, say, 90 and they're 89. skeleton-wave

EDIT: I was just tripping out at the idea of "you must be 90 years old to buy this" signs at the supermarket. Surreal image.

[–] Bassword@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah that's the point, kids born now will never catch up to the legal age.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Teddybearalleymngr@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Not a smoker or wannabe one but if someone is just one year behind in their age, they'll never be able to legally smoke with this setup.

that is the exact point

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 27 points 1 year ago

I believe that's the intention yes.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›