this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
696 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26237 readers
3411 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 74 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Just refuse to go anywhere that does dynamic pricing (if possible.) Steal from places that do it (if possible.)

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Everywhere is going to do it...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, it kind of already exists a lot of places. Look at places that have had lunch menus vs dinner menus for fifty years.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The difference is that prices change in a predictable manner, with dynamic prices, especially if they go for max greed, will be impossible to figure out.

The one in front of you gets a Big Mac for $5 your price is $15, and they can't say why, the algorithm has spoken!

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 5 points 4 weeks ago

Yea, makes sense. Still proves my point - everywhere does it/will do it, so good luck botcotting it.

You know the ducks in the park are free, you can just take them home.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

But how can I do the B if I cannot do the A

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Hit the trucks on the highway

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 weeks ago

B is for people who live where there’s no alternative, like small towns where Walmart undercut every other business and is now the only game in town. If you live in a place like that, steal from Walmart. If you live in a place where you have one store doing dynamic pricing and another that isn’t, go to the place that isn’t doing it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

So, no traveling? Airlines are well known for already doing this.

No more online shopping? All online shopping has at least the potential, plus you’d never really know

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Are happy hours and lunch specials not dynamic pricing? It's just a different way of framing it as a discount rather than surge price, but it's basically the same idea as far as I'm concerned. I'm happy to vote with my wallet on this, if Wendy's decides they want dynamic prices then I'll just go elsewhere. Fast food certainly isn't an essential.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It is known in advance which item is in special and at what price during a determined period of time.

With dynamic pricing, the price could change between you choosing what you want and actually order, without any notice.

This is two different beasts.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

I think what they're going to do is to change the price based on how much they think you can afford.

Say "I got a bonus today" while your phone is listening? Guess eggs just went up 20%.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Not familiar with the implementation, so maybe this is incorrect, but does Wendy's tell you when you're paying more or less? If not, my primary issue would be transparency. I know to show up for happy hour or lunch and I know what the prices will be.

I don't want to have to memorize the prices because they quietly bump up everything on the menu by $0.50 at peak meal times everyday for an hour and don't indicate that anywhere.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

As the other guy said, lunch specials aren't dynamic insofar as any pricing can be dynamic when the restaurant just changes prices willy-nilly. Which is what surge pricing is.

Lunch specials are a separate, generally static part of the menu. Like how using a coupon isn't considered dynamic pricing for the times when you have a coupon on you.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Lunch menus everywhere I've gone give smaller portions vs. the dinner menu to justify the ~~lottery~~ lower price. I'd love some lunch portions (and prices) for dinner as an option.

Happy hour is a good analogy though, except that they publish the prices and times 24/7 so it's not a surprise like surge pricing is turning into.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -5 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Yeah, because boycotts are well known to be super-effective and are definitely a great replacement for consumer-protection legislation.

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 34 points 4 weeks ago

No it's obviously no replacement for proper legislation. However in the meantime it is a step you can take in the right direction as an individual. When Wendy's started throwing around this bullshit I stopped going. Do they care? No probably not. But I know I'm trying

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It should be protected against. But, you know if a business changes to dynamic pricing and their next quarterly numbers shows that the vast majority of people didn't swallow it, and revenue is hugely down, they would undo it in a second.

The fact is, though. They know enough people WILL let them them get away with it. From their point of view, why would they turn down free money?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 4 weeks ago

But, you know if a business changes to dynamic pricing and their next quarterly numbers shows that the vast majority of people didn't swallow it, and revenue is hugely down, they would undo it in a second.

You would be right if we assume that

  1. The people leading these companies are making informed data driven decisions.
  2. Companies majorly made money through selling goods/services

However once a company is a certain size or in the correct position it's more about showing a growth potential to investors, then actually proffiting from selling goods/services. Investors is really how these companies make money now. I'm not an economist so I'm not sure if this is still technically capitalism when the majority of profits come straight from investors but to me it sounds much more like a ponzi scheme.

My point being is that in a best case scenario, a nationwide boycott could take place and a company makes $0 gross income. But they can still profit if they can convince their investors that they are taking the right steps to position themselves in "this new economy". Now realistically someone is still going to buy their products and any boycott effort will just have minor effects. The absolute worst case scenario for anyone actually in charge of making decisions like this at a large company is they get a golden parachute and hop over to another place.

Just like you said, why would they turn down free money?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Seems to be working, see all the news about fast food places lowering their prices because profits are down.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Why do you care if the place you don't go does something you don't like?

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

My personal boycotts are stupid effective as I haven't given HP or McDonalds or a whole lot of cunts any money in decades.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Call your house representatives, have them legislate on and forbid this practice, be explicit about not voting for them if they don't make it part of their platform.

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My representatives are already trying to prevent me from voting. Any other ideas?

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Start volunteering for the person running against them!

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

My general assemblyman has run unopposed since I've been old enough to vote; my congressman's district is so jerrymandered he's got better job security than a licensed plumber.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Then volunteer to phone bank for someone in a swing state where a vote may make the difference, and write other representatives. It's not illegal to tell other reps that you feel under-represented and the issues you are concerned about

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as you found a good excuse fuck trying to do anything huh?

Dude I'm from a Red State, we don't have a government of, for and by the people here. Writing my congressman has less of an effect on society than pissing in my own mouth.

What I'm actually doing about it is not eating at my local Wendy's ever again.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 33 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We'll each need our own personal mentat to figure out how much lunch will cost soon.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean a phone? Thinking machines are not outlawed yet

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

let's fucking goooooo

At last, we will rid ourselves of these troublesome large language models

[–] ogler@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

they're not really doing this, are they? i assumed it was a clickbait outrage farm concept that would never see the light of day

[–] hark@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

They tried to walk it back by claiming "we'd only be doing this to reduce prices" which clearly shows they want to do it but are trying to spin it in a way to minimize outcry for when they do introduce it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes they are.

They started with digital price tags stating it would “save the customer money” which is absolute bullshit. Adding a new tech-laden system to quickly adjust pricing isn’t saving anyone money, it’s a way to make more money.

And yeah, they’re already trying to gouge us deeper

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

These things can save the store money in the long run, but if I ever have the price change between picking an item up and checkout that's an instant manager lecture and walkout.

[–] 1050053@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

about a Twufir

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

What's this from? Is the dude with white eyes possessed?

[–] TheEyeOfBrows@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Additionally, that dude is a human super computer ("mentat" in the fiction). In the movie, they chose to portray him doing hard math by having his eyes roll back in his head.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Didn't even tell him that they make these human super computers by feeding them space cocaine. That's the best part.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think that that's true. Mentats themselves work alright without spice or that Sapho juice, though I think that both of these substances expand their abilities. It is Guild Navigators that are immersed in spice tanks for much of their lives.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

They get their powers literally from drinking a substance made with spice. It's explained in the books, and it's why their lips are stained red (something only the 1984 film actually showed on screen). The bene jesuit (the female witches; probably fucked the spelling up lol) also get powers from a spice-based beverage (the same one Paul consumes). Pretty much any expanded mind powers come directly from the spice, it's just a matter of degree of how much they take.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

No, their lips are stained by Sapho . The first mentats came about just after the Butlerian Jihad, before the discovery of Arrakis and spice.

[–] Tillyrblue@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Dune (2021)

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago