this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
696 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26716 readers
3264 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 74 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Just refuse to go anywhere that does dynamic pricing (if possible.) Steal from places that do it (if possible.)

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everywhere is going to do it...

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, it kind of already exists a lot of places. Look at places that have had lunch menus vs dinner menus for fifty years.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The difference is that prices change in a predictable manner, with dynamic prices, especially if they go for max greed, will be impossible to figure out.

The one in front of you gets a Big Mac for $5 your price is $15, and they can't say why, the algorithm has spoken!

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 5 points 2 months ago

Yea, makes sense. Still proves my point - everywhere does it/will do it, so good luck botcotting it.

You know the ducks in the park are free, you can just take them home.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But how can I do the B if I cannot do the A

[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hit the trucks on the highway

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

B is for people who live where there’s no alternative, like small towns where Walmart undercut every other business and is now the only game in town. If you live in a place like that, steal from Walmart. If you live in a place where you have one store doing dynamic pricing and another that isn’t, go to the place that isn’t doing it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So, no traveling? Airlines are well known for already doing this.

No more online shopping? All online shopping has at least the potential, plus you’d never really know

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Are happy hours and lunch specials not dynamic pricing? It's just a different way of framing it as a discount rather than surge price, but it's basically the same idea as far as I'm concerned. I'm happy to vote with my wallet on this, if Wendy's decides they want dynamic prices then I'll just go elsewhere. Fast food certainly isn't an essential.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is known in advance which item is in special and at what price during a determined period of time.

With dynamic pricing, the price could change between you choosing what you want and actually order, without any notice.

This is two different beasts.

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

I think what they're going to do is to change the price based on how much they think you can afford.

Say "I got a bonus today" while your phone is listening? Guess eggs just went up 20%.

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not familiar with the implementation, so maybe this is incorrect, but does Wendy's tell you when you're paying more or less? If not, my primary issue would be transparency. I know to show up for happy hour or lunch and I know what the prices will be.

I don't want to have to memorize the prices because they quietly bump up everything on the menu by $0.50 at peak meal times everyday for an hour and don't indicate that anywhere.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

As the other guy said, lunch specials aren't dynamic insofar as any pricing can be dynamic when the restaurant just changes prices willy-nilly. Which is what surge pricing is.

Lunch specials are a separate, generally static part of the menu. Like how using a coupon isn't considered dynamic pricing for the times when you have a coupon on you.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lunch menus everywhere I've gone give smaller portions vs. the dinner menu to justify the ~~lottery~~ lower price. I'd love some lunch portions (and prices) for dinner as an option.

Happy hour is a good analogy though, except that they publish the prices and times 24/7 so it's not a surprise like surge pricing is turning into.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, because boycotts are well known to be super-effective and are definitely a great replacement for consumer-protection legislation.

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago

No it's obviously no replacement for proper legislation. However in the meantime it is a step you can take in the right direction as an individual. When Wendy's started throwing around this bullshit I stopped going. Do they care? No probably not. But I know I'm trying

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It should be protected against. But, you know if a business changes to dynamic pricing and their next quarterly numbers shows that the vast majority of people didn't swallow it, and revenue is hugely down, they would undo it in a second.

The fact is, though. They know enough people WILL let them them get away with it. From their point of view, why would they turn down free money?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

But, you know if a business changes to dynamic pricing and their next quarterly numbers shows that the vast majority of people didn't swallow it, and revenue is hugely down, they would undo it in a second.

You would be right if we assume that

  1. The people leading these companies are making informed data driven decisions.
  2. Companies majorly made money through selling goods/services

However once a company is a certain size or in the correct position it's more about showing a growth potential to investors, then actually proffiting from selling goods/services. Investors is really how these companies make money now. I'm not an economist so I'm not sure if this is still technically capitalism when the majority of profits come straight from investors but to me it sounds much more like a ponzi scheme.

My point being is that in a best case scenario, a nationwide boycott could take place and a company makes $0 gross income. But they can still profit if they can convince their investors that they are taking the right steps to position themselves in "this new economy". Now realistically someone is still going to buy their products and any boycott effort will just have minor effects. The absolute worst case scenario for anyone actually in charge of making decisions like this at a large company is they get a golden parachute and hop over to another place.

Just like you said, why would they turn down free money?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Seems to be working, see all the news about fast food places lowering their prices because profits are down.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Why do you care if the place you don't go does something you don't like?

[–] aniki@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

My personal boycotts are stupid effective as I haven't given HP or McDonalds or a whole lot of cunts any money in decades.