this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
660 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

45536 readers
324 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen some people getting genuinely uncomfortable at the recent discourse. Just wanted to point out there's more than one kind of weird.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is Portlandia weird, and then there’s “I want the government to track your menstrual cycles” weird.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Came to say that: Keep Portland Weird Doesn't welcome MAGA-weird.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imo, the neat thing about this current "weird" discourse is that only right-wingers could ever find it genuinely insulting. Any sensible, self-actualized human being who isn't obsessing over the sex and genetalia of others is like "haha, yeah, I am kinda weird".

But the right wing is built on the misconception that they are "normal" and everything else is a problem. They're the only ones that could ever be bothered by being told they're weird, because it deconstructs the very foundation of their beliefs. Without the core of "we are normal and everyone else is causing problems in our normal society" backing up their every decision to threaten others over the religon, sexuality or life choices of others, they instead have to face reality: it's normal to be a little weird, and it's normal for some of that weird stuff to take root and become normal. And to refuse it and obsess over it is, in its own way, kinda weird.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago

Exactly, exactly! To keep it going, I think their whole worldview is based on what's "natural" and how their shitty behaviour and policies and ideas are normal and natural, because they view stereotypes about human nature (esp re sex, gender roles, race, family structures, etc) like these unshakeable institutions that they're powerless to influence in any way.

When really it's like, nah it hasn't always been like this, and it will continue changing, forever.

Further, we can do the very difficult work of trying to change it in a way that benefits more of us!

Hear fuckin' hear!

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The unease doesn't come from the word itself being a grave insult but, for example, from being bullied for being "weird".

[–] The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I get to call myself weird. You don't get to call me weird.

That's how this goes.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago

I like when people call me weird, means they’re comfortable saying it like it’s no big deal.

This is the goal for how I want people to view me tho

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'm not calling anyone that doesn't fantasize about their daughter or fuck living room furniture weird.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think "scary weird" is an excellent clarification.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I heard it as if you're fine being called weird, you're the good weird. If you fight being called weird, then you're weird weird.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 2 months ago

o0o0 i like that

weird²

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Creepy weird vs quirky weird

[–] InputZero@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Came here to say that. Quirky weird is wanting to wear a propeller hat as an adult because it's fun and no one can tell you no. Creepy weird is wanting to wear a propeller hat to predate on children. They are not the same.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Weird Al: good weird Trump: bad weird

It's not rocket science.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you like the word you're the good kind. If it offends you, well, you're weird.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just hope I'm a decent weird. I know I'm weird, because I use Lemmy, after all.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As the hatter told Alice, "we all weird here."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The different kinds of weird get lumped together in the media though

And that's why i hope to clarify.

[–] shy_mia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Depressed. Depressed weird

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That sucks. I'm sorry to hear that. As a life long vet of the Depression Campaigns, i can relate. I don't have any magic words that i can drop that'll magically make things better, but i wish i did. If you don't have someone to talk to, you can bend my ear.

load more comments (4 replies)

weird weird.

I'm not good, or bad, i'm a force of chaos that cannot be reckoned with, only conceptualized.

Also. what kind of discourse are we talking about?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Bout 60/40 here

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Should be nice weird and creepy weird.

[–] Unbecredible@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Weird just means unusual (with slight negative connotations already) . So to use "weird" as an unqualified insult is to say that being unusual is a negative thing in itself. Which echoes the sentiment behind things like xenophobia and such. That's why people are uncomfortable with this line of political attack, imo.

To say "there's good weird and bad weird" doesn't say much more than that there are ways of being unusual that you view positively and those that you view negatively. But that's obvious and doesn't resolve the issue I mentioned before.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I disagree that weird automatically carries negative connotations. "Keep Austin Weird" comes to mind.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also Weird AL or Hanson playing the song Weird.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I could see Weird Al answering the Witch of the North this question and being undeniably good. But why stop there? Great Weird!

The Great and Powerful Weird Al

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are you fascinated with the menstrual cycles of strangers? You want to look into the underwear of everyone before letting them into the public bathroom? You so grossed out by other people's consensual sex practices you want to take away their civil rights? You want trans children to cower in fear, and all the children to be surrounded by guns? You want women to know their place and shut their mouths? And black people to stick to menial jobs so you can kick all the brown people out of the country?

Or are you normal weird, i.e. partly fun weird and partly sad weird?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I bet Austin is having a blast with this shenanigans.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I guess when I hear people derisively calling someone gay, I just think to myself, "They mean the bad kind of gay, they're not talking about me."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

More offended by people using the word "discourse" to describe the relentless, terminally-online, America-centric shit-slinging.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

i dont think now is the time to be muddying the waters. conservatives dont need the assist, youre just giving them an out

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Do they accept being called weird? I think you give them entirely too much credit... but that's just my opinion.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter. Convservativea cannot accept the notion of a "good weird" because it removes all justification from their beliefs. The whole conservative belief system is founded on the notion that there is an effective normal and that normal must be protected from those that would upset it.

They cannot say they're the "good kind of weird", because that means admitting that weird can be good. And if weird can be good, they have no ground to plant the roots of their beliefs in. They have to be normal, because if they're weird, all the time they spent attacking others for being weird in the defence of what's normal doesn't make any sense. Calling themselves the good kind of weird is a complete 180 on what it means to be conservative and alienated a massive portion of their voting base who only vote conservative because they see people who are "just like them", not weirdos who are willing to redefine sex and gender, or question historical narratives.

The "weird" angle of attack has been so effective because it deconstructs the very notion of what it means to be a conservative. Giving them an out through the "good kind of weird" doesn't change that.

this is a fantastic point, thank you!

[–] pfm@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I suspect it's related to USA current affairs and have no clue what it's referring to. Any hints for us outsiders?

The Dem VP pick, Tim Walz, started referring to the Repubs as "weird," to which they responded by having conniption fits. Terrorists, rapists, pedophiles... all manner of names have been levied against the right, but a simple schoolyard taunt has them in tears. It's pretty interesting.

load more comments
view more: next ›