That's like... Your opinion, sis...
pfm
Nah, he's not that great... We already see him giving a silent nod to investors while ignoring how bad housing situation is in the country. Also, coalition with the left is mostly on paper - he claimed he'd clean up the mess with Catholic church reducing its funding. Now the church is getting comparable money from the new government. I don't trust them.
Do you eat them too? Asking for a friend!
Is that number with us in this room right now?
But where's Saddam? 🤔
It would be as good as letting MS Song Smith generate soundtrack for "Whiplash" ðŸ¤
Could someone explain how they're going to drive 407 km/h in traffic jam? Or in a city, in general?
I definitely agree that too many comments is often a bad sign, esp. when large part of them is obviously generated.
As mentioned in my other comment, names will rarely explain the reasons why a given solution was chosen. These reasons are important from maintenance perspective and should be recorded next to the relevant code.
You're definitely not the only one.
In my opinion the important information we should record in comments is WHY, because the code can only explain HOW, maybe WHEN, but never WHY. If we don't know WHY, any refactoring done in the future could break the logic by ignoring assumptions made by the authors.
You could step up for animals while still being a nice person - it was your decision not to.
On a serious note, I really enjoy yerba mate-based (or should I write flavoured) elixirs. Or even yerba mate itself. Just saying! 🤷