this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
721 points (97.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
3723 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Black man has filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against a hotel in Detroit, Michigan, alleging the hotel only offered him a job interview after he changed the name on his resume, according to a copy of the lawsuit obtained by CNN.

Dwight Jackson filed the lawsuit against the Shinola Hotel on July 3, alleging he was denied a job when he applied as “Dwight Jackson,” but later offered an interview when he changed his name to “John Jebrowski.”

The lawsuit alleges Jackson was denied a job in “violation of Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 148 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Is 'Dwight Jackson' a black sounding name? I'd have assumed the person was white if I'd read that name.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 124 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To the point that "Jackson" became jazz/jive-era slang that was the equivalent of "hey, what's up?" when black people who used that slang were talking to each other.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago

Over 50% of the people with that surname are Black.

https://discover.23andme.com/last-name/Jackson

That's nationally too. So in a place like Detroit with a large Black population, I feel like people would assume Dwight Jackson was Black.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed, it may just be a case of they weren't hiring but then they were or the first resume was lost or a different manager looked at the resume. There are so many reasons what it could be that it shouldn't be assumed race was a factor unless the hotel specifically said so.

Edit: reading the article I can see the guy applied many times before changing his name. I am slightly more convinced it was based on his name but it could still be they weren't hiring but then they were. Or maybe they just wanted to meet the guy with such an awesome sounding name "Jabroski" sounds like something you would say in the 90s when Pauly Shore was popular. Memorable names stand out and make an impression.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

these, among others, are the reasons why i didn't take the same action when i resubmitted my resume under a very WASPy sounding name and the desire gets re-ignited every time i get an interview request after re-submitting my resume the same day my original resume was rejected.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 125 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Middle-aged white guy here. First and last names, total white bread. Middle name? Black. Think "Tyrone" or "Trevon". (LOL, Trevon shows a spell check error on one of the top 20 black male names.)

Couldn't get a response on my resume for 6-weeks, nada. Changed the email to take out my middle name. Next week, 3 interviews and a solid job.

Had a black neighbor with a valley girl accent show up to an interview. 8 white girls waiting for their interviews. They showed her the door and said there was a mistake, no openings. She eventually got hired since her preacher was a top dog at the place.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The good thing about racists is that they're fucking stupid. Just interview the person and say nothing instead of making up an obvious lie.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 31 points 3 months ago

But what if the interview goes well... Then what? We can't just hire them. Then we'll be forced to maybe face... Something. Not sure exactly what...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (5 children)

8 white girls waiting for their interviews. They showed her the door and said there was a mistake, no openings.

This is baffling. She could clearly see the other girls, yeah? All applying for the same position?

How do you dismiss one candidate in front of others, and say there are no openings? I don't get it.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

They just didn’t finish the sentence. ‘There are no openings for someone of your heritage.’

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 3 months ago (23 children)

I've witnessed this first hand from the hiring side for an IT position. I was going through resumes with my boss and he straight up said, "I don't want any hispanics, I want a white guy." while tossing anything with a hispanic name to the side without even looking beyond that. This was in Orlando in an area with a large hispanic population. The kicker is that my boss was actually hispanic himself!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 66 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The kicker is that my boss was actually hispanic himself!

In the UK we call that racist taxi driver syndrome. A lot of immigrants come to the UK and because it's a good money earner, or at least because they think it's a good money earner, they tend to buy a taxi.

Anyway you get in and suddenly they start telling you about all their world views, usually it's along the lines have there been too many immigrants. Even though they are an immigrant themselves.

Very much a case of shutting the door behind themselves.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Haha so true. I remember some my friend's family going on about how we should all vote leave because of all the immigrants.

Mate, you were born in Napoli. You're as Italian as spaghetti. I'm not that kind of British person and, as far as I'm concerned, you're more than welcome here but you're the "immigrant" you hate so much. Not only that, your that being that person while banging on about how bad immigration is to a group of very obviously white native British people. It was just the most bizarre thing ever.

He still has an accent.

I genuinely wanted to be like "but we like you." I don't think that would have gone down very well though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 83 points 3 months ago (7 children)

His name was already about as white bread as it gets. This is a real and genuine problem when it comes to hiring, but it's going to be a huge uphill battle for him to prove anything here.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

When I think of the name "Dwight" I think of Eisenhower or the character from The Office. Not this guy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He doesn't need to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a civil suit. Essentially, his face value evidence is strong enough to win unless the hotel can provide clear explanation of how it did what it did, for example if they had different people processing different stacks of papers. At the same time, the plaintiff will have a chance for discovery, so who knows what will happen on that front.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] misspacific@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

jackson is an extremely common surname in the black community?? the fuck??

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's also extremely common in the white community. They're saying that his real name isn't one that would cause someone to assume you are nonwhite, like Will Dewitt, Ashley Jones, or Casey Smith.

[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's also an extremely common last name among white people. It tells you nothing on a resume. This dude's name is akin to someone named John Smith.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We had something similar out here where a black family felt their home evaluation was really low when they were getting ready to sell so they had a white couple "show" the home to a different evaluator from the same company and surprise surprise the estimated value was like 30% higher for the white couple.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

NGL. That is some really fucked up shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finley@lemm.ee 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Its even more comically bad than you describe and the link suggests.

The settlement was for a workplace racial discrimination lawsuit.

Discrimination^2

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope this is not a thing either. Issue is the proof, bigots aint putting this shit in emails unless they are trump voters.

But from statistical angle it is getting hard to justify the bullshit system wide but every wrong is settled out if it is that bad.

Nobody is ever at fault tho

[–] maxinstuff@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a well researched phenomenon.

It’s also been demonstrated that these sorts of biases have made their way into the AI models which are commonly used to review applicants.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 29 points 3 months ago

Models reflect the biases of their training data, garbage in garbage out

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is clearly a LOT of discrimination that happens in the hiring process and basically no oversight or accountability. How else can workers fight discrimination like this without going to the lengths that this man did?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Freakonomics talked about this ages ago

Not that they are a proper source or anything just... one of those things where it feels true and you keep seeing examples of it forever

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Freakonomics lists all their sources at least

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

There's also been tons of academic studies on it that back it up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I often fantasize that one day I'd start my company and require that all resumes be submitted without a name on it.

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 3 months ago

This is trivially easy to do if you're having resumes submitted through a form. But companies are not doing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›