Kimano

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (20 children)

People also don't realize that too much power is just as bad as too little, worse in fact. There's always useful power sinks: pumped hydro, batteries, thermal storage, but these are not infinite.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It keeps happening because people are human and make mistakes.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And the guy who invented it didn't ever have to use it for decades afterwards, it was purely theoretical to him.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

JD Vance is the only guy who can join the mile high club without leaving his seat.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sure, no one is saying that. The point is that it doesn't send anything other than the stuff after the keywords back to company servers.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

There's also the matter of there being literally hundreds of security and privacy researchers who would love nothing more than to catch Amazon doing this, and no one has in any major way.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Same but also add "less" and "fewer"

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

There's also been tons of academic studies on it that back it up.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Protonmail is encrypted and they literally cannot decrypt to record your data.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I mean there is an argument, whether you agree with it or not, for moral relativism, and in that case I certainly would say that in-universe, a moral relativist would consider the imperium the good guys.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean that guy is being an idiot, but it's also not quite that simple. There is still more and less ethical consumption. A fairphone is more ethical than an iPhone, and pointing that out in good faith to someone complaining about Apple's behavior seems entirely fair.

It's not a complete fallacy to point out that someone is consuming something less ethical when they have a better option. Obviously it's impossible for anyone to do this with literally everything, but absolutely you can avoid Starbucks because of their treatment of unions, and frequent a local coffee shop instead.

Granted this is mostly assuming two people having a good faith discussion, which on the internet is infrequent lol.

[–] Kimano@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

It also could be referencing something that they were better at in their prime, but may no longer be able to do due to age. Like answering running if your dad was a professional runner or something.

view more: next ›