299
submitted 2 weeks ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the Blyatbox. I guess we're going back to cold war era Russia where all their stuff is just worse blatantly reverse engineered copies of stuff from other countries. Makes sense, Putin for some reason has really had a hard-on for recreating cold war era Russia.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

stuff is just worse blatantly reverse engineered copies

The reason they only had reverse-engineered copies is because the bigwigs at the CPSU decided that the workers didn't need personal computers, despite the fact that all the computer research facilities in the USSR (of which there were plenty) recommended that they do.

If the USSR had thrown it's weight behind personal computing we could have had some interesting shit.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

People don't realize that the USSR was actually ahead of the USA and Europe in certain fields they decided to put effort in...

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Sure, when you can force the workforce to do a thing, that thing tends to get done. But they'll probably do it slower than if they chose to do it. So other things will suffer if they force a certain initiative.

And that's what we saw in the USSR. Certain initiatives progressed well (space program, nuclear program, etc), while others suffered (food production, basic manufacturing, etc).

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] GenosseFlosse@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You underestimate how affordable or accessible a computer was in the eastern block. For reference, a color tv that is "mass produced" and didn't need much expensive high tech parts would cost as much as you would earn in one year - if you manage to find one in a shop.

For a computer you needed to find keyboard, drive, monitor, software and the computer itself which would be at least equally expensive to a color tv.

All the chips had to be manufactured locally in the eastern block, because there was an embargo on western computer tech. RAM alone was 10x more expensive because the manufacturing process was very inefficient.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Going back to the cold-war era where the USSR had to manufacture and provide mostly every single consumer good for its own citizens due to economic sanctions and isolation. You can't compare luxury goods made all over the entire world for a wealthy minority, designed by experts from all other industrialized countries, against soviet-made mass-produced items which were meant to be able to be produced in as many units as possible using the least amount of resources possible. It's just different manufacturing paradigms.

The USSR was what is called a "shortage economy" as opposed to western capitalism's "surplus economy". In capitalism, an abundance of competing companies in the same field leads to overproduction of most goods in a way that some products from some brands end up on the shelves of stores and storage houses collecting dust, and companies who manufacture a lot of these non-desired products, disappear. This leads to an inefficient waste of resources and labour, since it leads to unused goods and services.

The USSR, on the other hand, had a state-planned economy in which, using predictions of the planned output of raw materials, decided what to produce with these materials. Producing 10 more drills, meant that you had to produce 10 fewer units of something else. Hence, the economy was optimized so that only as many as strictly necessary of most goods would be manufactured. Additionally, the products were design to require the least amount of labour and resources necessary to be manufactured, taking into account mostly long-life and easy repairability to prevent inefficiencies. It was the only way that the USSR could, as a less industrialized state than for example Germany or the US or Britain (which had started industrialising around one century before the USSR did), could provide goods for everyone, and for the most part it did. The quality of products may not have been as high as high-quality consumer goods in the west, but that's simply a combination of design choice to be available to cover more goods with similar amounts of raw materials and labour, of fewer experts in design and manufacturing than worldwide due to the size of the soviet block and their economical embargos.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

On non-complex stuff, I wish some of our shit was still built to last like shortage economy stuff was. It seems like planned obsolescence creeped from a handful of products to basically everything.

A lot of it is market forces and globalization — people just get the cheapest version off Amazon if they don’t know the brands — but even relatively expensive clothes, tools, charging cables, etc. break all the fucking time.

This isn’t a communist vs. capitalist rant so much as an old man one. Simple products were generally better quality in the past. The cars broke down more but the tools you needed to fix them lasted fucking generations. Jeans didn’t just rip like they do now. Even things like pocket knives lasted forever if you took basic care of them. You can still find quality products but it’s increasingly impossible in some product categories.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Planned obsolescence is a direct consequence of capitalism, and it gets worse the more capitalism develops. Capitalism, through competition and markets, makes some companies triumph and some companies to be outcompeted by the ones that triumph. This, coupled with ever-increasing capital investment by the companies that get the most profits, leads unequivocally and necessarily to increasing concentration of capital in the hands of a few companies in a given sector: oligopoly and monopoly. And when a sector is dominated by oligopoly and monopoly, it means competition between companies, the whole premise of capitalism, disappears. And it is at that point when malpractice such as planned obsolescence becomes a thing, because consumers literally don't have a choice.

You're absolutely right that it would be great to go back to times before planned obsolescence, but the only possible way to do so is politically, by eliminating the very system that leads to planned obsolescence.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] auzas_1337@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I would probably call it something like Нахуящик. I think it would resonate better with local audiences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Excited for the Blyat Boy Advance

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Guess they can't keep buying Xbox controllers fpr their drones. So they create a console to get kids to play video games and natively learn the new controller they will eventually use on the battlefield

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

I hate how accurate you are. There's no other reason it would be government backed ESPECIALLY during war time where they're pissing money away and losing their soldiers left and right without be able to fill the open spots.

Well, the reasons are probably:

  • wanting to develop domestic chips
  • wanting to develop software companies
  • wanting to push russian culture among the young population
  • and others
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Call of Duty is very literally the greatest military recruitment tool the US government has and I'm pretty sure the c-levels at Activision have been full of former state department officials for the last 15 years

[-] Sniatch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I remember seeing a documentary about Tom Cruise and how the movie Top Gun made lots of young people sign up for the military. Just a fun fact, not arguing against you.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

I know that to get the US military to let you use their planes or their boats they need approval on the final film so tobget the really good shots and set pieces you have to let yourself be used as propaganda

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

From what I hear, the war spending is still pretty low, all things considered. This could just be another autarky subsidy.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 31 points 1 week ago

They could call it the Dendy 360 or something

[-] ECB@feddit.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Doubtful, given that Dendi is Ukrainian...

But now that I think of it, he's a Russian speaking Ukranian so maybe he WOULD be their first choice...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago

This is certainly a choice.

I feel bad for the devs they’re going to hold at gunpoint.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago

can't wait for "next to last fantasy" to come out

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And Smash Bandhooter, Blyat and Jaxter, Guitar-Trompetto, Road Combater, Earthly Fight, 770 Brass Peeper, and of course, let's not forget; Trophy of Courage: Ukrainian Front.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Blyatstation is going to be a huge success, trust me.

[-] Spez@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago

I bet they will release some rebranded chinese android console with a shitload of cracked games and call it a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I guess the Kremlin thinks that it's a soft power concern (subversive Western ideas in front of our children's eyeballs), but in all seriousness, this seems way down on the list of things that I'd be worried about if I were them.

  • In terms of exposure to a domestic audience, consoles are closed platforms. They can probably mostly restrict creation and sale of Russian-language content that they find politically-objectionable. That's probably a lot easier and cheaper than trying to produce a new state-subsidized console.

  • Scale matters here. China hasn't done this. If China hasn't done it, I doubt that it's gonna go well for Russia.

  • This is gonna drag people off projects that they're actually gonna need more in terms of import substitution. I mean, direct military stuff aside, your whole economy is gonna have problems with lack of access to stuff from outside.

  • Consoles have a relatively-low gaming marketshare today, due to mobile. They're probably globally the least-important.

  • Of all of the gaming platforms out there, PC, console, and mobile, consoles are the least-useful in terms of non-game applications. If Russia wants to be a player in one of those, consoles would be the last I'd choose. It'd probably be easier to just ban consoles in Russia, if necessary.

[-] ylai@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Three side remarks about China, which can be a peculiar example to compare to for Russia, maybe even any other country:

  • They actually banned consoles for a quite significant 15 years (2000–2015), which strongly tilted their market towards PC.
  • Their companies actively make PC-type gaming handhelds, and many of them are even well-established in the business ahead the current “Steam Deck” wave/bandwagon: GPD (once called GamePad Digital, first release in 2016), OneXPlayer (2020), Ayaneo (2021).
  • Chinese gaming companies are quite at the whim of the censorship, and occasional “crackdowns” out of the blue, and many have therefore reoriented themselves for an international audience to de-risk their business.
[-] realitista@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Immediately made me think of this.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Dendy Deck is the most exciting console ever made! I am totally not being held at gunpoint in front of a window right now!

[-] ascril@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I will believe it when I see it. Who will be making games for them, I wonder.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 9 points 1 week ago

They can just reskin steamdeck and sell pirated content, aint shit anyone can do to stop them.

Do they have the hardware for it? There's an embargo on all of the relevant hardware...

They can make their own chips, but on super old equipment, so it'll run hot and poorly. So they'll be limited in what domestically produced equipment can run.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 4 points 1 week ago

Embargo on mid level amd chips?

They still seem to be getting them either way.

Sure, through black market channels, but that's a very different problem than building a domestic product around a certain chip.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

Russian programmers are pretty good; don't underestimate them. A lot of them are focused on malware, mind you.

I don't expect Russia will make a console on par with a PS5, but they might make one closer to the hardware of a SNES Classic mini-console.

[-] ascril@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

You are right, but you should remember that a lot of them fled the country to skip conscript. Moreover, games are made a very long time, 4-5 years minimum and it costs a lot of money. And to make independent platform you must create a lot of games because no one will buy it if you can't play at anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Rosconsole is best Russian console! Play exciting Russian video games!

• Is Drink Borscht Contest

• Vote for Putin

• Call of Russian Duty: Freed Maximum Security Prisoner Ops

• Tetris

• Federation of International Bandy Jam

• Soviet Food Line Simulator

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
299 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

55606 readers
3492 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS