this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
594 points (97.4% liked)

News

21742 readers
4029 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 280 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good. Fuck you and fuck off. The fact that you lost to a queer person is just icing on the cake.

Don't call yourself a Democrat and be blatantly anti-trans. Of course you're going to lose, you moron.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 70 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Here I was thinking "oh please tell me she didn't lose to a regressive GOP tool" but seing who she actually lost to absolutely made my day.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The keyword here is "Primary"; in a Primary election, you are running against one or more candidates from your own party, and if you win, your name goes onto the General ballot.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, so a regressive GOP tool might still win...

[–] Alto@kbin.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone else commented, the incumbent won their last election 87%-13% to a libertarian in a race where the GOP didn't run a candidate.

I don't think there's much risk of that, thankfully.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why the Hell was the Democrat in a district like that anything less than super-progressive to begin with?

[–] Alto@kbin.social 8 points 1 month ago

That's a fantastic question

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Stealth Republican. I can't say this for sure but, since the district leans so far left that the Republicans didn't even run a candidate last time, this individual probably just ran as a Democrat even though she intended to support Republican positions once elected. Campaign as if you have the same ideals as the voters, then turn coat once you're sworn in. It's been done before.

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 month ago

That just makes my day. Maybe even my whole week.

Piss off ye regressive in Democrat clothing.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 125 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thierry’s district ... is not a swing district. ... Previously, Thierry had beaten a Libertarian candidate 87%-13%, with no Republican running in the race.

In case anyone thought this might have been a tactical ploy by a dem in a heavily republican area, it was not. Just a crazy person shooting themself in the foot with their own cruel thoughts.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Literally no excuse

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I was wondering exactly that.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 month ago

A big hearty fuck you and fuck off to her. The Overton window has not moved that far. The gap has just widened as the conservative right moves into open fascism.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 46 points 1 month ago

Always nice to see a bigot lose

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If Democrats want change, this is how to do it:

  1. Win general elections; vote blue no matter who. 2 Primary out the corporatist candidates every chance there is, right down to the level of school trustee.

This actually works, as we've seen with the GOP and their turn to rabid fascism. It can also work for good.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is hard in some races. I just had to do a bunch of digging to figure out which state supreme court candidates were secretly Republicans because they're all required to run as unaffiliated and pretend not to be biased. So they all make the same damn comments about judicial overreach but one is talking about preserving our democracy by preventing it and one is talking about imploding our democracy by doing it. My head hurts but I figured it out omfg.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's great to hear! Few people vote in those elections so your informed vote matters much more.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I mean it's only the primary I hope people actually vote in the general? But it's incredibly frustrating to vote for judges. As if we're all so stupid as to think they're above political bias in this day and age.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Win general elections; vote blue no matter who.

Staunchly supporting Henry Cuellar and Bob Menendez during the general and then getting very confused when my party loses in a landslide two years later.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

arguing that conversion therapy was the true solution to gender dysphoria

"Abuse is the solution"

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think she ment to say "final solution"

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Can’t transition if you kill yourself

Which incidentally I’ve said to talk teenagers out of suicide

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Real Uncle Tom energy to the suggestion that you can whip people straight.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ah the classic "Beat the gay away".

Tried for over 70 years by American bigots and still not succeeding in doing anything but causing extreme anguish. but its the right wingers we're talking about, so the suffering is the point.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

"The beatings will continue until mental health is improved."

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago

Diet Republican will always lose, Glad a real progressive took your place.

[–] emzili@programming.dev 36 points 1 month ago (4 children)

When asked about her anti-trans votes, [Thierry] called gender-affirming care “Black genocide.”

Does anybody even know what this is supposed to mean??

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I’ve heard that stance used for abortion, so I assume it’s a statement trying to equate consensual sterilization (which shouldn’t be required to transition, but sometimes is) to the history of nonconsentual sterilization of people of color in America.

Now it’s a batshit take, but I’ve found transphobes tend to use whatever legitimate grievances they have against anybody and slap it on trans people.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only way in which I can try and make some sense of it would be if a black person, who's mostly in an environment where there's mostly black people, and therefore the majority of or the only trans people they know are black, thinks that non-black trans people are insignificant, and that trans people can't ever have children.

Personally, I'm grading this conspiracy theory with a F. Grifters used to put in more effort back in my days.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Grifters used to put in more effort back in my days.

Trump showed them they didn't have to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is politics. You don't have to say things that mean anything as long as they sound good.

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

You’re so right and it’s so depressing.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's roughly the same as swatting criticism of the Zionist Genocide by claiming that said criticism is anti-semitic - it conflates two quite different groups (in one case Jews and Zionists, in this case LGBT and Blacks) in order to weaponize the humanist moral position about the treatment of one of those groups to stop criticism of immoral actions by or (in this case) against a different group.

This is quite a common element of the gaslighting which is so typical of Liberal politics (a very common example is female liberal politicians defending the kind of legislation that will hurt the poor claiming that criticism of their position is due to their gender), though this specific example is an especially exagerated and ridiculous version.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The real story:

Democratic primary 2020, total votes: 14,263.

Democratic primary 2024 total votes (before run-off): 12,761.

~10% drop in Democratic primary voters (reliable D's).

Lauren Ashley Simmons will win this district, but the things that is telling is the drop in voter engagement. These are the only data points we'll be getting on this going into the election.

But a 10% drop in reliable D's electoral engagement should be more than concering to Democrats.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Primary runoff elections were held on some random Tuesday, just after a recent election on property taxes and other local issues. If you want voter turnout, elections need to be held on consistent days every year, and not some weird date pulled out of a hat when voters already just went to the polls.

Better yet, give us ranked choice primaries so there aren’t any runoffs.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, those are fine editorials, but the data is what the data is.

This isn't the only data point. Democratic voter engagement is depressed when compared with 2020.

We're only going to get a few more of these before the big game, and we should weight them more heavily than typical polling.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Maybe the dems should try to do better than "slightly better than Trump "

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree that dems have cause for concern broadly, but I'm not sure that a 10% drop during an uncontested incumbent primary translates to a "10% drop in reliable D’s electoral engagement".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yep, data from the 146th.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Just shows that political affiliation takes a backseat to ideologocal beliefs

[–] nick@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago

Good. Rest in piss you fuck.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This is in the Texas House of Representatives (Houston).

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do we still do crab rave?

🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

We try, we try...

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

What are the odds she will vote republican?

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

She looks like my mom

Actually..

load more comments
view more: next ›