this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
787 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

4771 readers
4050 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I had to look at the date on this, because this is exactly how I still dress, except that it's been promoted to business casual and the dad-cap goes with baggy t-shirts and cargo shorts.

I'm getting old, and y'all will too.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

It's comfortable. I should've started dressing like this a long time ago.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When did this become business casual? I'm still stuck with slacks and a polo.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

YMMV. I've been working from home since 2018. Them fuckers are lucky if I wear pants at all.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

When I work at home it is mostly pajamas.

But work at home isn't business casual. Business casual is what to wear in a less formal public setting, like a conference or office. While some people have started to wear jeans in those settings, I have never seen anyone in flannel shirts and broken in hats in a setting described as 'business casual'.

Yes, some offices don't have dress codes and that is fine to wear, but agsin they don't call themselves 'business casual' either.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I mean, it's not even really a "your mileage may vary" thing. If you're working from home, then you're completely disconnected from what standard "business casual" is.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well, fashion being cyclical, people today are literally influenced by fashion companies pushing 90s fashions.

The tiny sunglasses, baggy pants (even jnco style jeans are back in style), 90s full bathing suits for women (when you almost never saw anyone under the age of 40 in a one piece a few years ago), 90s boy band haircuts, big platform Skechers-style shoes, white calf-length socks, the high waisted jeans…some day, the early 2000s fashion of low waisted jeans, body jewelry, massive sunglasses, trashy-chic look etc. will be back in style.

In the early-to-mid 2000s, we laughed at how bad the 90s fashion was. Just like people dunk on early 2000s fashion now. Pretty crazy what people in fashion manage to do. Completely change the way everyone dresses en masse. It’s pretty weird, honestly.

I found my style pretty young—or maybe I just never grew up into more “adult” fashion. It just doesn’t feel like me. But I still like a slimmer/normal cut jean, pretty much all black everything, band shirts, a flannel when it chillier, etc. My look will always be in style because I make fashion.

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I'm not looking forward to it. Right now I just wear what I like and no one cares, but at some point I have to go through the experience of people saying, "Ew, why is that old guy trying to be fashionable?" a few months before people start saying, "Ew, look that old guy is a couple months out of date, what a loser!"

[–] vynlwombat@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

But would you fight if you had a sword?

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but not if Godzilla also had a sword

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck that, it breathes fire.

Maybe if I had a scaled up pistol, then yeah.

But you’d think some of this military equipment could do the same amount of damage.

[–] UlfKirsten@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This one doesn’t breathe fire

[–] The_Overseer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can godzilla flip kick ? Or fart fly ?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I did not expect to see this famous clip in the comments, but thank you so much for the pleasant surprise.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit is this real? I have to watch the old godzilla movies if it is

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yup, Godzilla vs. Megalon, which I saw via Mystery Science Theater 3000!

[–] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A regular-sized sword, or a big one?

[–] vynlwombat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

One of those big final fantasy style swords

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A battle of fisticuffs against a walking radioactive disaster would be problematic to the guy, let alone the city.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Tell that to Ultraman.

Actually, that makes me wonder if his suit is actually radiation protective? Or is that just his natural skin?

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm actually not too well versed in the lore. I just remember him fighting large monsters when I was young. I'll take a look later today.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ll take a look later today.

Appreciate that, but don't do that on my account, I was just curious, and making conversation.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same with me haha.

Edit: just did a quick search and couldn't find anything explicitly about radiation protection. But he did defeat some creature that was feeding on the Earth's uranium mines and potentially power plants?

Also it seems like the suits only have a small window of active time before they have to find another host or something. So maybe the radiation wouldn't matter on that short time scale.

I'm getting all this from a 5 minute search, so if anyone knows more than my shaky ramblings, please correct me.

Interesting read though. Makes me want to watch some old Ultraman.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think the 98 Godzilla was unfairly maligned. It did everything I needed a Godzilla movie to do, and it didn't take itself too seriously. Solid film.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

did everything I needed a Godzilla movie to do

This is kind of baffling, if I'm being honest. What exactly is your baseline for what a Godzilla movie "needs to do"?

That being said, I agree that it gets a bit more hate than it probably deserve...but not by much. There are a couple fun sequences, I particularly always liked the Madison Square Garden ~~raptor~~ baby Zilla bit, even if it has no business being in a Godzilla movie.

That's really what it comes down to. It's a passible Roland Emmerich popcorn flick at best, but it's a terrible Godzilla movie.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 5 points 2 months ago

In my opinion, the best Godzilla movie was Shin Godzilla (I've heard Godzilla Minus One is GOAT but I haven't seen it yet).

What made Godzilla interesting was the subtext.

Godzilla outside of Japan doesn't make a lot of sense. Godzilla is explicitly a walking nuclear bomb.

In Shin Godzilla, Godzilla is defeated by a competent government, a fantasy we can all enjoy.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Wrong. No mothra.

Also, Jean Reno and three voice actors from The Simpsons.

[–] The_Overseer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But godzilla has nails and flaming hot mouth.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So does Chester Cheeto, but I ain't scared of him either.

[–] The_Overseer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

What, you don't want to get swallowed whole or get your hand bitten off?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It's always the carpenters.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Say what you will enjoy this film, it was a wild ride. Sure it may not be pure Godzilla, but it never tried to be. I much prefer it to the 2014 version.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure it may not be pure Godzilla, but it never tried to be.

Except in the name

[–] Vedlt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I think this is the crux of the problem and where most of the hate comes from. You can have a good kaiju movie without Godzilla, but can you have a good Godzilla movie without Godzilla? I would argue that no, you can't. I would also argue that the monster from that movie wasn't Godzilla... it was Matthew Broderick. /rimshot

But seriously, a lot less people would have ragged on that movie had they given it a different name, but arguably a lot less people would have seen it if they had given a different name. 🤷

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You're right.

I will always believe that it started life as a remake of The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms. It's almost the same film except for the Velociraptor rip off section.

[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I could be 10 times Godzilla's size and I still would't try to fight him.

Like I am not running around punching squirrels in my day to day, and if one came at me I'd apologize and offer him my lunch to get him to leave me alone.