this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43124 readers
1371 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me : Trippie Redd's "!" Is actually a great album

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Separating the artist from the art is fine.
You can like music by someone who doesn't share your social, political, or religious beliefs with.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Upvoted because this is the one I most strongly disagree with.

Hitlers art but ignore the holocaust?

Lost Prophets but ignore the lead singers horrifying SA of children?

Kanye West and his anti semitism insanity?

Chris Brown and beating the shit out of women?

R. Kelly and SA a child?

Rowling and her hatred of trans children?

Michael Jackson and his .. weird child obsession?

Gary Glitter and his SA?

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Separating the artist from the art is fine for me as long as you don't support them. There is nothing inherently wrong with consuming media you like from a controversial figure.

Of course it's hard to separate the artist and the art if you actively give them money for it.

I like some of Kanye West's music but I would never spend a single cent on one of his albums, watch an ad on Youtube for his music videos or listen to his songs on streaming services.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I cant stand listening to someone singing, knowing full well they rape children πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

each to their own I suppose

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the examples you gave

Yes, that’s what separating the art from the artist means.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well aware. I am listing examples of why I cant separate. Hence my β€œdisagree” comment

🀨

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Then apparently for a person who can separate them, there are zero examples. Or null

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

It depends: if you only listen to music (or view artwork) to feel "good" or enjoy "basking" in the emotions it evokes, then it makes sense to steer clear of artwork you disagree with or makes you uncomfortable.

But if you find value in viewing artwork that illicits a multitude of emotions, evokes introspection, throws you off balance, and forces you to consider concepts you wouldn't otherwise, then taking a moment to peak into the mind of someone you fundamentally disagree with is a great way to do that.

As Werner Herzog put it, "the poet must not avert his eyes".

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

The Pianist is one of the best war movies I’ve ever seen… even though Polanski.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I'll go a step further:

You have to separate the art from the artist because there is not a single artist I've ever encountered who wasn't some kind of fucking trashhole of a person.

Artists spent their lives on being artists, not developing good interpersonal skills or understanding politics or philosophy.

Beleiving an artist is a "good person" is just setting yourself up for disappointment. Start out assuming they suck dogshit and you usually end up being right.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it's reasonable to draw some lines that, when crossed, you'll choose to disengage from their art.

The musician doesn't have to be a saint. But if I find out they, I don't know, love eating live puppies, I'm going to prefer spending my time and attention elsewhere.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but I like to start from a position of "this person probably sucks" because then I'm never disappointed.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 months ago

This is a fair position to take.

I tend to avoid listening to interviews with bands I like in case they're terrible.

Though weirdly I'll chat with folks at merch tables.

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 3 points 3 months ago

Sam from Future Islands is a pretty dope guy.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

Agreed. Show me a flawless human being, and I'll show you someone who doesn't have anything interesting to share with the world.

[–] Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My mind is telling me nooooo

But my body

My bodyyyyy is telling me yesss

[–] Yerbouti@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

This is actually really popular among my music students. I completely disagree on most case. X raped 300 kids but hey, he makes pretty good beats so let's pay 200$ for a concert.

[–] GuyFi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm alright with this as long as you pirate it lol

[–] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's the same as buying Nestle Hot Chocolate knowing full well child labor was involved. It's ok as long as your sweet tooth is satisfied.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You got downvoted by someone who didn't understand sarcasm so I evened it back out.