this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
575 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37599 readers
358 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve known that the iPhone is switching to USB-C for a while now, but there was always a possibility that Apple would stick with Lightning for one more year. Based on the latest leaked images, however, Apple is all-in on USB-C for the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro models, with USB-C parts for the iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, and iPhone 15 Pro Max all shown in a leaked image by X user fix Apple.

With the switch to USB-C, nearly all of Apple’s devices will have adopted the new standard, with only AirPods, Mac accessories, and the iPhone SE remaining aside from older iPhones and the 9th-gen iPad.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

fucking hell are we really at number 15? Are they just going to keep going with this naming scheme until the iPhone 1523?

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

extra annoying because in software we have semantic versioning which is objectively better for all purposes other than marketing.

Semantic versioning isn't useful for all kinds of software. Plenty intentionally choose to not use it. Look at the Linux kernel, for example.

[–] CobraChicken@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You simply cant win. People make fun of Xbox fand Windows for having non sequential names, and iPhone gets berated for having a naming scheme that's sensical, easy to follow and date

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yup, out of all the things I hate about Apple, their iPhone's naming scheme is something I wish other brands would follow (including Apple with thier other devices).

Apple iPad on the other hand, is a completely mess.

To OP, what's wrong with sequential names? I look at an iphone and i know exactly when they were released and their relative performance to other iphone models. Why is it a bad thing?

[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Remember the New iPad, or the 3rd gen iPad as literally everyone called it?

Apple did try to simplify in the same way they did with Macs, but then they fragmented the iPad line so much that it was difficult to keep up, so now you have "12.9" 2022 iPad Pro" as opposed to "5th gen iPad Air".

Still, it's better than the abominations that Sony come out with. Looking at you, WH-1000XM4 headphones, or Bravia KD55X75WL (2023).

[–] Wilshire@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Samsung went straight from S10 to S20.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

that makes a lot more sense, it looks better and you get the well-proven benefit of bigger numbers.

Eventually you get to S3000 and that's when you know you've made it

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not buying another Samsung until it's over 9000.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Samsung Galaxy S I9000 is released in 2010. Or the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 N9005 in 2013.

[–] hazeebabee@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago

I think samsung is going with the year as the name now. They skipped to s20, but then have going with s21 s22 s23 etc.

[–] pakiyimo@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Samsung made it so the model number would match the year it was released.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Having worked internally to Samsung at that time, I can confidently say, no, it isn’t. They did it so that their number wouldn’t be behind apples anymore.

[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

They are halfway to iPhone XXX

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

A few more than that if you count the S versions.