161
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
161 points (96.0% liked)
Games
30499 readers
230 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Larian is the new CDProjectktRed. And by that I mean they are projected to be a perfect, infallible, manifestation of developer perfection that gamers will worship and praise blindly until Larian proves themselves to be mere mortals by making a mistake.
Their future mistakes notwithstanding, I can still appreciate the good work they're doing now.
Thankfully I’ve loved them for like a decade now so. It’s okay if they topple I saw them rise 😆
This is true if you ignore that their history starts in the 90s with some pretty average games, not in 2017...
You're thinking too literally.
I‘m starting to get the impression people build them up precisely to watch them fall and kick them down. It‘s in our DNA, I‘m afraid. I mean the praise they get for the most mundane claims (and often they are just that) is ridiculous to the point they‘re becoming the developer version of the life of Brian. And deep down we‘re already anticipating to watch them bleed out at a cross.
same with naughty dog 😂 I'm waiting for Insomniac to screw up next (hopefully not)
Not a good precedent.
"by making a mistake"
Is a bit of a understatement I'd say.
Except the Witcher games consistently failed to live up to expectations
I think they are the next cdpr in the sense that they are AA
In what bizzaro world did the witcher series fail to live up to expectations? The first one was a masterclass of atmosphere and had zero expectations, the second were just fine and the third one still is the gold standard for quest design in open world games.
Third had a pretty buggy launch
1-2 were just buggy and full of jank
Buggy like most ambitious open world games, but still perfectly playable. It certainly lived up to expectations, it was one of the most praised games of its time, more than what I've seen about BG3. Granted I don't follow the industry as closely as I did back then.
Just because you didn't like 1 and 2 doesn't mean they didn't live up to expectations. CDPR was nobody before witcher 1 and a small studio before 2, so I really don't get how they didn't live up to expectations for those two games.