And at this point the cost difference couldn’t possibly be so stark that they have to make it a great leap in price. I think they offer these 8GB models for non power-users. People doing spreadsheets and presentations all day, but honestly even then 8GB of memory just seems like they’re cheaping out.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Even then, 8GB isn't really enough. Get a few browser tabs going (with full apps integrated) in a Zoom meeting and you'll run out of memory right quick.

Hell, I regularly use all of my 32GB of memory. Granted, with my job and ADHD, I often have 20+ tabs open in each of several browser windows at the same time with multiple documents and spreadsheets and other apps all running.

But, still. 16GB+ is non-negotiable for me in an entry-level laptop today. And there are decent options available for under $500 CAD rn.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nothing has made my computer slower than trying to open Excel. FFS. You need min 32GBs of RAM and a 4060 for that thing.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Hell, I regularly use all of my 32GB of memory

On what operating system?

I have 16GB on my Mac and half of it goes to a virtual machine. And I'm definitely a heavy user - five browser windows open with who knows how many tabs is pretty common. An IDE or even two, plus all sorts of other stuff, and a bunch of electron apps too.

MacOS definitely uses "all of the memory", but often at least a few gigabytes (as in, almost half my memory aside from the VM) is dedicated to caching files on disk. And with a fast SSD that's not buying you much performance.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

Windows 11.

The big difference I noticed with the extra memory is that my browser tabs don't get cached, and programs I haven't used in a long time are still responsive instantly (i.e. they also weren't cached.)

[–] nous@programming.dev 10 points 7 months ago

I bet the 8 GB model ismore for lowering the advertised price then it being useable.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

My company is deploying new basic, mass-produced, small form-factor office PCs. No graphics-editing, no programming, integrated graphics card, just basically spreadsheets and web browsers. The standard is that each of them have 32gb of memory. 8 is ridiculous...

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 13 points 7 months ago

Computers are cheap, employee time is expensive. Giving your employees computers that limit or slow them down is a very poor investment. Maxing RAM, CPU and GPU even for relatively basic work can make some sense if you look at it that way (within reason, dont need to give everyone 4090's, but definitely go better than an etch-a-sketch :) ).

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

When I built my first computer a decade ago, I put 16gb of ram in lol.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Is it just me or is 16GB even on the low side for a pro user? I have 128 on my desktop and 80GB usage is normal for what I do (software dev; lots of local virtualization)

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

All I do is game and stream, occasionally edit some photos and 32GB is the minimum for me now.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, this is pretty much what I thought. So I don’t understand why people are pretending that eight or 16 is going to cut it.

Maybe they are just happy purposefully limiting usage due to a constraint that they don’t realize is easy to raise.

I like to have 3 4k monitors and four desktops and 10 chrome tabs opened on each one along with SQL stuff and a half dozen vscode windows, and a full visual studio or 2, wsl2 running with a dozen docker containers, plus all of the collaboration programs like Telegram and Discord. And I don’t like to close any of that down when I go play flight simulator. So the extra couple hundos is nothing so that I can be sure to never run out of ram.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The M3 is powerful enough that even 32GB can be a constraint for what you'd be able to run on it

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That entirely depends on if what you’re running requires lots of ram or is more cpu bound. I wouldn’t conflate the two as directly related.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

That's true, but unless you're 100% sure that you'll only ever run a workload that fits those specs, I think you'd rather like having the extra memory.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

Answer probably depends on the nature of your usage?

I have a 16gb m1 air, and it is okay for development, but i dont have any VMs (except docker i guess, and also android VMs). I have run out of RAM once, with multiple pycharm/clion/browser windows open. Its not great, but its livable. I run out of screen realestate first usually. I use it for personal projects to kill time on trains, so not super heavy stuff.

But otherwise yeah, more is better. I have 64 gb in my desktop and 96gb in my work PC, and occasionally i can hit the limits there.