220
submitted 11 months ago by trashhalo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

Meta's new text-based social app Threads has quickly gained 100 million users since launching last week, which appears to be negatively impacting traffic on Twitter. According to web analytics, Twitter traffic declined 5-11% over the first two days Threads was available compared to the previous week. Threads was able to grow rapidly by allowing users to sign up with their existing Instagram accounts and bring over some of their followers. However, Threads has not yet launched in Europe due to regulatory issues. The fast growth of Threads may solidify its position as a real competitor to Twitter, which has over 238 million daily active users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 108 points 11 months ago

This is a moment when I'd love to use the "you love to see it" meme comment, but it's more like... "People are fleeing the burning building, and running across the street to an identical building that is infested with rats and cockroaches!"

[-] vampatori@feddit.uk 36 points 11 months ago

"Out of the frying pan, into the fire"

[-] g0nz0li0@beehaw.org 24 points 11 months ago

Maybe an optimistic take: people moving = people realising they can move. Eventually some of them may also realise they can move to a platform that’s not controlled by a shitty corpo.

[-] sammydee@readit.buzz 5 points 11 months ago

And can instead move to a platform that is controlled by a rando instance owner with their own set of quirks and foibles. And can choose amongst thousands of such instances, each controlled by a different rando with a different set of quirks and foibles. Out of the frying pan and into the fire indeed.

[-] KingStrafeIV@midwest.social 8 points 11 months ago

It's more like realizing that you're surrounded by fire, so you might as well pick a patch with a nice view.

[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Which is why I like Beehaw.

[-] g0nz0li0@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

And can choose amongst thousands of such instances

Kinda glossing over that point.

[-] wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

That's a good point. Plus they won't be as embedded in the new place as they won't have 10+ years of history on it. So moving becomes easier generally

[-] EvilColeslaw@beehaw.org 19 points 11 months ago

"...and running across the street to an identical building that is infested with rats and cockroaches!"

Still better than Nazis.

[-] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 22 points 11 months ago

LibsofTiktok is approved there, so I'm not so sure. Not overwhelmingly Nazi, but Nazis are welcome as long as they don't say slurs kind of thing that centrists like.

[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

They may not say the slur, but they encode it.

[-] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Exactly, because that's the line for centrists. Bigoted and hateful statements are perfectly acceptable in cynical corporate "neutral" spaces if they're framed "politely." As long as the bad words aren't used, they're permitted. Libsoftiktok wants nothing less than the total elimination of certain populations of people and there's no way in reality that that should be an acceptable topic of political discussion regardless of word choice.

[-] yozul@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

The Nazis set the fire, and now they're fleeing along with everyone else.

And hey, I'd rather have them on Threads than in here with us.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago
[-] pvr@beehaw.org 10 points 11 months ago

Fediverse has a lot of them too

[-] GuyDudeman@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately true.

[-] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, about that …

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago
[-] sammydee@readit.buzz 11 points 11 months ago

While ranking the misdeeds of billionaires is a tricky business, given the choice I'd say Zuck is slightly better than Musk at the moment. :)

[-] svarozic@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

No need to limit yourself to those two awful options when good alternatives exist which aren't run by either of them.

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hard disagree there. Facebook contributed to literal genocide. Elon is just an asshole.

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah well. Children are dying every day in cobalt mines because we need minerals for EV batteries

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, but unlike Elon's claim, he did not actually invent the electric car. He wasn't even the founder of Tesla. It was going to happen with or without him.

[-] Banzai51@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

The guy that sold Bannon the user data he wanted under the table?

[-] DJDarren@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

Could I play it safe and fire them both into the sun?

[-] TerryTPlatypus@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

Probably better to use "out of the frying pan and into the fire"

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
220 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
263 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS