NotAnonymousAtAll

joined 2 months ago
[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Warst du sauer als du das herausgefunden hast?

Mir egal wer angefangen hat, ihr hört jetzt alle beide auf, aber sofort! Muss ich erst bis drei zählen?!

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Was? Wie ? Wo? Gibt es einen Gurken-gegen-Tomaten-Konflikt?

Ich liebe ... ich liebe doch alle ... alle ~~Menschen~~ Gemüsesorten ... Ich liebe doch, ich setze mich doch dafür ein ...

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob das jetzt ein komischer Zufall mit willkürlicher Namenskollision ist oder ob du den Artikel falsch gelesen hast.

Wie dem auch sei: Laut Artikel ist Waltraud Dullnigg die Sprecherin der Landespolizeidirektion (LPD) Kärnten, nicht die Person die da im Wald auf Soldaten geschossen hat.

I would argue that people who feel the need to prove their masculinity tend to be the ones not realizing that, and people here are making fun of that.

But is it USB-IF’s fault manufacturers tried [...]

Yes, it absolutely is USB-IF's fault that they are not even trying to enforce some semblance of consistency and sanity among adopters. They do have the power to say "no ~~soup~~ certification for you" to manufacturers not following the rules, but they don't use it anywhere near aggressively enough. And that includes not making rules that are strict enough in the first place.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (8 children)

They are not bad at this. You are bad at understanding it.

I work with this stuff, and I do understand it. Some of my colleagues are actively participating in USB-IF workgroups, although not the ones responsible for naming end user facing things. They come to me for advice when those other workgroups changed some names retroactively again and we need to make sure we are still backwards compatible with things that rely on those names and that we are not confusing our customers more than necessary.

That is why I am very confident in claiming those naming schemes are bad.

"don’t even bother learning it" is my advice for normal end users, and I do stand by it.

But the names are not hard if you bother to learn them.

Never said it is hard.

It is more complex than it needs to be.

It is internally inconsistent.

Names get changed retroactively with new spec releases.

None of that is hard to learn, just not worth the effort.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

War euch eigentlich bewusst, dass ihr hier beliebige Anzeigenamen festzwiebeln könnt?

Edith:

Wann/wo

  • Zwiebel-Ranslite?
  • EherVielZwiebel?
  • zwiebelcode?
  • superzwiebel?
  • Zwiebeldunstabzugshaubitze?
  • onions_are_underrated?
  • dognoinO?
  • Zwiebelthrasher?
  • zwiebel261090?
  • Instantzwiebeln?
  • Peter_Zwiebellos?
  • TotallyNotOnion?
  • Katzwiebelastrophe?
  • OnionsTheBus?
  • Zwiebelbrotmann?
  • Zwiebelgeschaltet?
  • onion reverse?
  • Zwiebelmädchenjunge?
  • Zwiebelwort?
[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sorry, didn't want this to look like an attack or disagreement. Just wanted to highlight that point, because arbitrary maximum sizes for passwords are a pet peeve of mine.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nee, das ist mir zuviel arbeit. das mit sonnencreme und krebs weiß keiner, weil man dazu eine studie machen ,müßte, in der die leute krebs bekommen.

War weniger als 20 Sekunden Aufwand.

 
68
ich✋iel (feddit.org)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org to c/ich_iel@feddit.org
 

Außerdem hätte ich von einer Bundesministerin eigentlich erwartet, dass sie das Grundgesetz kennt, speziell Artikel 20 Satz 4.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gg/art_20.html

100
ich⚡🐀😮iel (feddit.org)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.org to c/ich_iel@feddit.org
 
 
view more: next ›