94

Sounds like a stupidly easy question to find out with a quick internet search, but it's not.

I don't want to know the average surface temperature, or the average ocean surface water temperature, or read another article about climate change.
But that's all I found in the past hour.

I'd like to know the average temperature of all molecules that comprise earth, or a best guess scientific estimate.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zeet@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think the median average temperature is around 2,200°C.

The Earth has a radius of 6,371km, giving a volume of 1.08e13km^3.

A sphere of half this volume would have a radius of 5,057km. Within the Earth, this sphere would sit at a depth of 6,371 - 5,057 = 1,314km.

From this chart, the temperature at that depth is around 2,200°C, so half the volume of the Earth has a temperature above that, and half a temperature below it.

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The problem with that is the temperature inside that sphere gets over 4000 degrees above that value and the temperature outside that sphere only gets to around 2000 degrees below it.

Edit: Just realized you said the median, you may be right.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

Higher than you think. The inner core of earth is ~5K degrees C and the outer core is ~3K degrees C

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

That's actually lower than I thought.

[-] topsecret@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago

For the record, you should probably use a lower-case 'k' (as in kilo, the SI prefix) rather than an upper case K (the unit of temperature, Kelvin), both in general and especially when referring to temperatures!

[-] Jack@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago

The crust is minuscule compared to the core and mantle.

The mantle makes up about 84% of Earth’s total volume. The temperature varies from about 1 300 K (1 000°C, 1 832°F) near its boundary with the crust, to 4 000 K (3 700°C, 6 692°F) near its boundary with the core. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/mantle/

The temperature in the Earth's core is uncertain: estimates at the inner core boundary range from 4 000 K to 8 000 K and at the core–mantle boundary from 3 000 to 4 500 K. https://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfbdxa/pubblicazioni/nat.pdf

[-] statue_smudge@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago
[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

Genuine question, how would mass vs volume change the answer?

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Volume would mean get the temperature of every m3 of earth and average them out, mass would mean the same, except before averaging you would weight(ahem) them, so a cube of air counts less than a cube of lava.

[-] Eylrid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Counting by volume would get tricky with the atmosphere. Where do you draw the line of where the atmosphere ends? Even thousands of miles from Earth there is very thin atmosphere.

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] Eylrid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

That's reasonable, but it means that whether you count by volume or mass the atmosphere is a negligible contribution to the average.

[-] Filibuster_Rhymes@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

The core is small by volume but very dense (massive) and very hot. An average temperature by mass would be much higher than an average by volume.

[-] crsu@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Let me get out my thermometer, brb

[-] Centillionaire@kbin.social 18 points 6 months ago

I have my apartment set to 72. My temperature is 98.7 and my wife’s temperature is “Leave me alone, I’m sleeping.”

Hope this helps.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

When you say "all molecules that comprise earth," are you including every molecule in the atmosphere out to the Karman line? Are you looking for an average of every molecule, or an average by volume? There are more molecules in solid matter than gaseous, obv

[-] throwafoxtrot@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 months ago

When you say "all molecules that comprise earth," are you including every molecule in the atmosphere out to the Karman line?

For what it's worth this won't change the result in any meaningful way. Both in terms of atom count and atom mass the atmosphere makes up only a tiny fraction of the earth's material.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

If you're taking an average by unit of volume, it absolutely matters

[-] throwafoxtrot@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago

By about 4.8 percent.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Of course you also have to include the mars rover and the voyager probe!

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

You will have a very difficult time finding this. The average temperature of all molecules on earth is absurdly difficult to calculate, nearly impossible to gather data on, and not something that's very useful for any practical calculations so no one has bothered to do it.

Black body radiation is probably more what you're looking for, I would suggest starting there.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

Why is it hard? At least to get an approximation since you can't measure everywhere.

We know temperatures of the mantle and both cores. We know their size. We can ignore the crust as a rounding error. This approximation will improve as our measurements get better.

[-] CrinterScaked@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Black body radiation was my thought as well. It may not be the average including the inner layers, but it's the average at the crust. About -1°F according to Wikipedia.

To add to this, is probably hard because the composition of the interior of the earth is a lot of guesswork. We can only directly observe how much heat is coming out of it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_history_of_Earth

[-] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't think that's an answer that really exists in any meaningful sense since temperature is a macroscopic phenomenon. When you get down to the scale of the microscopic, i.e. of molecules, then atoms, then particles, you really only have amounts of kinetic energy of said particles, typically measured in the unit electronvolt, or eV.

When said particles interact, they impart kinetic energy to one another, which directly constitutes the thermodynamic fluctuations we see in macroscopic systems.

Put simply, microscopic energy levels create macroscopic temperature readings.

In other words, "temperature" is just a macroscopic reading of collective microscopic energy levels.

 

tl;dr: Molecules don't have temperature; they have energy.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Molecules don't have temperature; they have energy.

You need this distinction when it's about gas.

Here we are talking solid and fluid matter.

[-] SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I imagine that if you look up the estimated temp for the Earth's Mantle, you'll be pretty close to what the average temp is.

[-] vivavideri@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

After cruising the comments and reading your post twice I propose the following because I'm that asshole today:

Go by layer.

Okay, so, assload insta-death ballpark Celsius in the center, okay fine. Maybe median this one. Then, consider some other identifiable layer(s) between there & surface, with some more eyeballing. THEN, for good measure, as many surface temps you can get for sea/land/air if you have chosen the range to include atmosphere.

Report back. I'm half asleep and haven't checked my work. Also. I only ever need half a reason to suggest implementing excel to assist in your calculations 😂 I'm so sorry

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago

Why can't you take an average of global average ocean, surface, and air temperatures? That seems like it'd be...an okay...estimate...

[-] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Cauuse ocean temperature varies greatly with depth, and air temperature with altitude.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Hotter than it was last year, and the year before that, and...

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Average?

The hottest place on earth is the core, about 4400°C to 6000°C(average around 5200°C)

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/core/

A short google point out that the coldest place on earth is Eastern Antarctic Plateau, Antarctica (-94°C)

https://www.newscientist.com/question/coldest-places-earth/#:~:text=1)%20Eastern%20Antarctic%20Plateau%2C%20Antarctica,of%20coldest%20place%20on%20Earth.

And since no living thing is hotter than earth core and no living thing is colder than antarctica(other than my ex), then we calculate the average of this two((5200 + -94)÷2) and we get 2553°C. That's the average temperature of earth.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago

That's a pretty dumb way of calculating average since it's just the average of the biggest value and the smallest value. That's neither mean, median, or mode for the whole planet. It needs to be weighted by volume or mass in order to be an accurate average.

[-] sknowmads@dormi.zone 2 points 6 months ago

It is a half decent Fermi approximation though.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
94 points (96.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34309 readers
1759 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS