118
submitted 7 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social 152 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nobody's saying your dipshit child doesn't work hard. They're saying he has access and opportunities few others do.

Is the only reason he's in a position to be cast for roles that you're his parent? Probably not. Is a reason he's in a position to be cast for roles that you're his parent? You're stupid if you don't think so.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 100 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Plenty of struggling actors have a good work ethic but don’t have powerful/successful mommies and daddies giving them a foot in the door, Meg.

It's not dismissive to call him a nepo baby. It's just a reflection of reality. It doesn't make him a bad actor, it's just acknowledging he's privileged by being the son of two very famous actors. Besides, [puts on Jeff Foxworthy mustache] If the biggest hardship you face in your life is being called a "nepo baby" then you just might be a nepo baby

[-] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There is nothing wrong with parents using their influence to help their child. And there is nothing wrong with people pointing it out.

If the child doesn’t want those easy comparisons they could have done something different than their parents. That’s what most children do who have to brave their own way.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

I admire the Hollywood nepo babies who changed their last names to distinguish themselves as an individual rather than linked to their famous parents.

This Quaid kid obviously did not change his last name.

[-] ChexMax@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

That only distinguishes them in the public sphere. The people who would help them based on their parentage still know who they are. Imo it's more about PR than actually shedding their leg up

[-] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

There is nothing wrong with parents using their influence to help their child.

I'm gonna disagree with you on that one, Hoss. It's definitely a problem.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Any system one imagines that necessitates that parents won't do whatever they can to give their kids the best shot, is a fundamentally flawed system.

[-] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

Fuck that nonsense. This is the same mindset as every poor person who thinks of themselves as a "temporarily embarrassed millionaire." You say it with the assumption that you're somewhere in that equation and don't give a shit about any kind of equality. That's selfish as shit. You phrase it like they should be stopped from helping to make sure their kids are still fed while off at college or some shit, but we're talking about millionaires helping their millionaire children also maintain their millionaire lifestyle by leveraging their brand to possibly get a role someone without famous parents could use to fucking survive. I don't care how able he is to do a good job, it's bullshit to pretend he actually deserves it because his parents really feel like he should.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I think you responded to the wrong post.

[-] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I did not! I definitely intended to respond to you implying there's nothing wrong with parents using their influence to help their child.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Ah, I understand the confusion. I didn't write that, or imply that.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Isn't Harvard being investigated for this very thing?

[-] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah.

I'm not vying for a pure meritocracy, but the system we currently have to work and live in, as established, expects merit to be the thing that enables success and advancement in living conditions. As long as that's the system were in, those that already exist with a certain level of privilege of already achieving acceptable, if not ample living conditions, shouldn't be given an additional lead on those that don't. This guy was never going to be poor or struggling to eat because he couldn't find a job.

When speaking about privilege, I like to use the race analogy. Some people are given bikes while some are given cars, and others even just have to walk. This guy was born with a sports car already, then his parents started him a mile ahead from the starting line.

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Bradward/Hewey is awesome on screen. Please don't let him be a douche in real life!!

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fortunately, I haven't seen anything that'd suggest he is. And being a nepo baby doesn't suggest it in and of itself either. Meg's just pissy because "the little people" are pointing out that her son had access and opportunities that 99.9% of us don't. He had a leg up on everyone by the circumstances of his birth, it's just silly to try and handwave it away and pretend he got there purely on merit.. It is what it is.

[-] Kepabar@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago

To what end are we bringing it up though?

Is there a point, or is the only point to degrade the actor in some way?

I feel this is one of those situations where I can say 'You aren't wrong, but you're an asshole' if you are bringing it up without a greater reason.

I don't think the dude would be ragged on for taking advantage of the opportunity afforded to him.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

I'll take your word for it. (I couldn't stand more than a minute of that host.) Relieved!

[-] Peafield@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

He's amazing on the comedy podcast Comedy Bang Bang.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Ahh yes the ol' "Billionaires work 100,000 times harder then fast food employees" defense.

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Mummy thinks her son is a handsome boy.

[-] habanhero@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Unpopular opinion - sure, it's fair to point out the privileges that offsprings of Hollywood elites enjoy, but let's not pretend the term "nepo baby" is not a backhanded sound bite to demean this particular group and devalue them in some way.

Personally if I'm a Hollywood elite, I'd be less offended if my kid is called "privileged" rather than "nepo baby", but people choose the latter for this exact reason.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
118 points (94.0% liked)

Not The Onion

8742 readers
121 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS