435
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 166 points 7 months ago

Don't see what the problem is, most of these big brands love to fuck people.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 87 points 7 months ago

Because in porn it’s consensual and enjoyed by both parties. They don’t want customers getting any ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alphacyberranger@lemmy.world 97 points 7 months ago

Today's pegging is sponsored by Nestle.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Today's bondage is brought to you by Pepsi.

[-] ODuffer@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago

Better seen on Pornhub next to some anal fisting than on Twitter/X next to blatant nazi propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kubica@kbin.social 58 points 7 months ago

Many sites have to get rid of adult content because of complains. Now what they are also going to blame porn sites for having porn?

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 41 points 7 months ago

Like people who move next door to a live music venue and complain about the noise.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago

Or ones who move in next to a pig farm and complain about the smell

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago

who the fuck cares why is this bad

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Be quiet, the only reason you can masturbate in peace without being flooded with ads is because advertisers think it hurts their business.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 7 months ago

without being flooded with ads

You never went to a random porn site from Google search with a dozen pop-ups and 30 consecutive re-directs?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

i only volunteer to watch ads nowadays

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

It’s more of a major goof on googles part than anything bad. These big prudish companies will start to pull ads if they think their brand is at risk. Apple has had rumors of expanding their ad network so if Google keeps slipping they might step in.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

imagine not buying a MacBook because you seen it next to a vagina

these companies are idiots if they think anyone gives a fuck about this

[-] demonsword@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

imagine not buying a MacBook because you seen it next to a vagina

this is exactly what religious nutjobs usually do

[-] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

They would have only seen that combination if they had gone looking for the vagina though...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ugh@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

The headline leaves out the most important part. Ads aren't only being shown on porn sites, but they're also appearing on websites that are hosted by sanctioned countries (eg, Russia). If those websites are getting kickbacks from Google, that violates laws. The EU is already investigating it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sheepishly@kbin.social 37 points 7 months ago

Youtube: Nooooo!! You can't say the fuck-fuck word in the first three minutes of the video and you can't cover content that isn't friendly to our advertisers!! If you do anything out of line we will demonetize you!!!
Meanwhile, Google:

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Ugh, I hate hearing a no-no word in the video YouTube serves me after the 5 minute blowjob machine ad.

[-] June@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago

Oh no, not on HARDCORE porn!

I mean, in front of my salad?!

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Don't forget to have your salad tossed!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yuki2501@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

As usual, ~~redditors~~ lemmings commenting on an article they haven't read. This isn't just about your brand appearing on a standard porn site. It's also about your brand appearing on disinformation sites like Breitbart. Also, if your ads appear on those sites, it means that very probably your money is ALSO going to those sites.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 7 months ago

I mean the problem really started with a headline that misrepresents the article

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 26 points 7 months ago

I know that when I’m watching two hairy jocks fuck each other’s brains out is exactly the moment I’m thinking of buying a new set of LG kitchen appliances at The Home Depot’s Black Friday sale.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

Think of the product placement opportunities!

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

I can’t say if I’d be swayed into a purchasing decision by a porn site ad for collars from a pet store or rope from a hardware store. But I would absolutely respect the hell out of them for it. (Actually, if a hardware store made a “build this!” style ad where you made some sort of kink hardware from a pick list and free plans, I might actually go for it, because I like crafts and kink.)

Can you imagine the opportunities for novelty beds? Not just the newfangled memory foam ones or the adjustable base ones, but the ones with the slits and divots and cutouts for pillows that promise to solve all the problems with side sleepers and intense cuddlers? I don’t need any of that but I’d definitely be more receptive to one if I saw something interesting being done with them.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Just as he’s lifting the bottom’s leg to get that undercarriage shot, I’m looking at the dishwasher he’s being fucked against. The sleek stainless steel finish. The touch controls. Is that GE Profile? How many decibels is it? I bet it’s under 45! I bet they’re doing dishes right now, and I can’t hear it!

[-] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

If they're having a piss and cum soaked orgy on the bed but in the next scene those sheets are clean then yeah I'll have a look at that washing machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You depraved ingrate. You disgust me.

I can't believe anyone would be so morally bankrupt as to buy LG appliances.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 25 points 7 months ago

did they blame the client for caring, and then sue whomever discovered it? i hear thats very popular lately.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 months ago
[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Contract violation for brand safety and media buy. Possibly fraud.

Imagine buying a vegan gluten free cake for 30 bucks. The baker gives you a dairy and gluten cake actually worth 15 bucks retail price.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Hold on a second.

Someone saw these ads and thought "I should admit to my porn habits to spread this information that materially doesn't affect me, but puts revenue in Googles wallet and probably doesn't harm the big brands at all?"

[-] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Can people not separate ads from what ever they are reading/watching in their minds?

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

right in front of my pasta en brodo?!

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


According to an Adalytics report, the Google Search Partner Network (SPN) has allegedly been putting brands at risk of all of these undesirable placements without advertisers fully realizing the dangers.

Among those impacted were big brands—like Amazon, Apple, BMW, Home Depot, Lego, Meta, Microsoft, Paramount+, Samsung, and Uber—and top government entities including the US Treasury and the European Commission.

Ads from nonprofits like the American Cancer Society and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, as well as major media outlets like The Guardian, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal were also found on illegal or adult sites.

To determine roughly how seedy the SPN might be, Adalytics relied on open source data and web crawlers to flag search ads displayed on 7.2 million sites.

According to MediaPost, it has been estimated that the SPN "generates about $10.5 billion annually" for Google, while requiring advertisers to "acknowledge that our policies meet any image and reputation standards you may have for your company” before creating an ad campaign in its Search Network.

Adalytics' report included a disclaimer that its "study does not allege that any entities violated US Treasury or international sanctions or any other anti-money laundering (AML) laws."


The original article contains 684 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago

Holy shit who gives a fuck

[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Google must be desperate for cash. All those ad blockers are running them dry....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
435 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

55643 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS