255
submitted 7 months ago by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swope@kbin.social 38 points 7 months ago

I think ebike, scooter, etc. usage will increase even more if we mod infrastructure to be safer for everyone.

[-] Delphia@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

This is the kicker. They are a pretty good solution now, but they could be amazing.

At least in my country they need to hammer out a consistent set of rules and laws regarding their use. Last time I checked the vast majority of them are effectively illegal because under current laws they are too powerful to be considered an assisted pushbike, you cant register them as a roadgoing vehicle because they dont have indicators and brake lights and you cant ride them on the footpath because riding on the footpath is against the law.

Which puts them in that lovely legal space of "Does a cop want to fuck with me today?" Fortunately our police tend to be pretty cool on the subject because they know that technically taking it out of your house is illegal which is dumb.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

we need to infiltrate civil engineering standards boards and make protected bike lanes mandatory for all roads with 4 or more car lanes or speed limits over 25 mph. then they'll be the default everywhere because going against code will invite lawsuits

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah they aren't even allowed on the roads where I live so I never see them except on the Internet.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fuck yes ebikes!

Not only do they slash oil demand, but manufacturing and maintaining an ebike has a fraction of the environmental impact of an electric car. Also, you can do a lot of the maintenance yourself with cheap tools and a small amount of work space. Also also, makes my ass look good~🍑

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Also, unironically, e-bikes are more fun than cars. You feel the acceleration much more on a bike than a car despite moving slower, and the breeze going by you feels pretty nice too.

Not to mention a lot less likely to kill someone.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 11 points 7 months ago

I remember the first time I went about 30 mph on my conventional bike down a hill. I had so much fun, I went up the short hill again!

I'm graduating soon and plan to reward myself with something pricey. An e-bike is a strong contender because I hate driving my car as much as I do.

[-] blakeus12@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

i'm glad to know that as a bike salesman i've done more for the world than melon-musk

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

This fact is why, as much as random scooters being everywhere may annoy me, I see the value in having them around.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My biggest issue with scooters is that the sidewalks on most streets in North America are way too narrow to safely use them while others are walking, and we're seriously lacking in dedicated bike lanes. Both of which are issues with the prioritization of car infrastructure over all else as opposed to problems with scooters themselves. Since scooters cannot safely run on the road but is still too fast for exclusively pedestrian paths. Where there are dedicated bike lanes in my city, scooters share them with bikes perfectly fine.

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

I feel like most roads where you'd ride a scooter the cars would be less of a problem if they followed the speed limit. Scooters should be able to go down 45mph roads just fine but there's always some massive truck going 60.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, unfortunately speed limits don't mean anything and studies show that drivers pretty much always drive as fast as they think they can regardless. The issue is that North America has stroads which are highly conducive to driving fast, damn near highway speeds. If we had the narrow, potentially tile or even cobblestone local streets that European and Asian cities have it would be less of a problem because those conditions directly promote lower speeds and more attentive driving.

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I've heart NotJustBikes say similar things. I normally don't favor control over everything but at this point I would be ok with cars having electronically controlled speed limiters to not exceed the speed limit of whatever road they're on.

It's really just created such an entitled, careless, and demanding mindset where bikes need to have speed limiters on them for safety but Fred can buy a 1200hp 3 ton weapon with no limiter.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

CityNerd also has a video on speed governors! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBSkLrYbLk0

It's also not unheard of either. IIRC Japan had speed governors on their cars for a time, which limited them to their national highway speed of 100 km/h (which is still very fast to be fair).

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I'm perfectly fine with there being interstates that go 85mph I just don't want people driving so fast in dense areas with mixed traffic. If I could have people just not be assholes that would be great but I feel like driving the speed limit now is just reason for someone to get angry with you and want to drive you off the road.

I'd love to ride a bike everywhere I can but every road I would be riding would have traffic going over 45mph with massive vehicles who have drivers so impatient they'd rather run you off the road than share the road.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Or just build roads and bike spaces with safe separation.

If you tighten roads people natively drive slower

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago

the dockless rent-a-scooters need to go. privately owned escooters? great. dock based systems? also great. escooters littered all over the street? nah

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I don't like them either but when Atlanta banned them pollution and traffic became significantly worse. They serve a purpose.

[-] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

the dockless rent-a-scooters need to go

Yeah, I get it. Private vehicles everywhere on the side of the street are an eyesore and take a ton of valuable public space. If at least e-scooters were as small as a car it wouldn't be such a big deal to see them parked everywhere.

[-] kamenoko@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

They're also stupid dangerous to use and provide almost no protection if a car finds you, or you hit something the wrong way and go flying.

[-] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 7 points 7 months ago

I have an ebike, and I really want an electric scooter/bike once the range can be improved, currently they couldn't get me to and from work (it's a long commute)

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Stop on by !micromobility@lemmy.world if you're interested in ebikes, scooters, bicycles, skateboards, or whatever personal transport might interest you.

[-] Des@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago

i want one so bad

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But it’s more than that—they are actually displacing four times as much demand for oil as all the world’s electric cars at present, due to their staggering uptake in China and other nations where mopeds are a common form of transport.

Their batteries make them heavier than a traditional car and draw heavily on the extraction of rare earth elements.

Smaller electric options like scooters and skateboards also offer a way to overcome the last kilometer problem that plagues public transport systems.

A study of e-scooter riders in the United Kingdom found these trips produced up to 45 percent less carbon dioxide than alternatives.

Global oil demand is now projected to peak in 2028 at 105.7 million barrels per day—and then begin to fall, according to the International Energy Agency.

If you live in an outer suburb or regional towns, you may find the longer range and larger capacity of an electric car is better suited.


The original article contains 922 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
255 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9469 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS