[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

Lol

"Do not use an incredibly concrete example"

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

I missed it for a while, then got some shokz open run.

They are so easy I forget I'm wearing them, and they cover the music needs from my phone. For better audio, I go to other things.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Now you just hatin', edit after you just made some wild assumptions

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Words have definitions. Real life has different situations. Those situations have different motives and results, even if they share features. Edit you can't just declare everything violent terroristic.

It's silly to assume that the same actions would have the same impacts on two very different types of crime, despite both of those crimes having a gun.

For example: red flag laws where family or certain professionals can bring forward action to take guns away from someone or get them certain care. This is triggered by said folks detecting or acknowledging certain concerning behaviors in someone who might carry out a mass shooting.

This wouldn't help with someone considering a robbery, as their pattern of behavior (edit and motivation) isn't the same.

I am not advocating for red flag laws, or discounting them. That's not the point.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 19 hours ago

I'm aware of the basics of gun safety, and aware that having a gun elevates the charges on a crime like a robbery. Pointing a gun at anything does indeed make clear your willingness to kill.

But you dodged the point of my reply, the motive or intent of the crime.

A robbery is not terrorism, or terroristic in motive. A robbery has a cause and a goal outside of killing. I'm not saying an armed robbery isn't an inherently violent act, and I never said that shit about "trynna scare them". Not sure where you gathered that.

You've devolved to name calling, inserting thoughts for others, and dodging the point of what you're replying to. Seems you're about spent

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

How else would I get the files out?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago

Pixel 5, refusing to die.

I just cleaned out all storage and man it's still zippy

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago

He's actually overweight in that photo for a movie role.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

Gaining weight as you age is not "normal". It is "common".

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

"so many" just means the women he's interacting with have them more often than they previously remember.

It's their own anecdotal, subset. A sample.

They are discussing the observation they have on the women they are meeting. Not all women.

To assume they are describing all women, or further, passing some meaningful judgement on all women is an invention of the reader

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

Dude was deprived of his freedom, put in a life threatening position, etc.

Those are serious things

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

If the bathroom and toilet are "dewy" the bad design falls on the house itself.

1048
submitted 6 months ago by GBU_28@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Just seems like everything is "this company did this to their employees" and less about "this novel messaging protocol offers these measured pros and cons." Or similar

And yes, I could post things, but I'm referring to what hits the top, 12h.

Can anyone rec communities with less of a biz and politics and wfh vs in-office vibe?

view more: next ›

GBU_28

joined 1 year ago