this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
286 points (98.6% liked)

Games

19361 readers
183 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

70% of games with online requirements are shit anyways, so who cares.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 70 points 1 week ago (6 children)

All art should be preserved, even if it's bad

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Van Gogh was never really financially successful during his lifetime. It shouldn't really be up to us to decide if it's good or bad for all time. I agree that art should be preserved. But, I'm also a data hoarder lol

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Maybe Van Gogh would be considered a mediocre artist with some rare masterpieces if all of his artwork would have been preserved. Who knows...

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I agree with both statements.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meh.

Not sure I agree. I get the sentiment, but garbage should be discarded.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have to be able to learn from the garbage and why it was garbage.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Besides, some garbage can be turned into entertainment. AVGN and all the youtube poop using CD-i Zelda wouldn't be the same

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think you understand the scale of art that is created every minute of every day.

Yes, art should be preserved when possible and shouldn't be intentionally destroyed. But not all art could even be preserved, it just isn't possible.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

In the case of games, this is doubly problematic due to patches and updates. People can still play Fortnite and Overwatch today, but they can no longer play those games as they were in 2018. Anyone that never played previous versions can only read changelogs to get an idea of what changed and when.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago

These type of videogames (and most types to be fair) are not art, only consumer products.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hitler was an artist. There are plenty of bad artists that shouldn't have work preserved.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Why so? Everything should be preserved regardless of who made it.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

His art was mid, and he was obviously a monster. We should still preserve his art.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

the Holocaust could have been averted if Hitler was allowed to be an artist, even though he wasn't very good at it by the standards of his contemporaries.

Art has value even if it is "bad".

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you are in the EU, remember to sign the petition too:

https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home

Deadline is close, 2025-07-31, and we haven't reached 50% yet

[–] SuperV1@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Ezpz for me to sign 👍

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 week ago

Not doomed for those selling them.

People will just buy the next thing.

I stopped buying games when Call of Duty decided to no longer allow you to host your own. That was mtast game purchase, I refuse to buy any more. Turns out I have more time for other stuff now.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

killer queen black still pisses me off. It was still 100% playable without the servers (if you had people to play with), yet they killed all online functions entirely and delisted the game so you can't even buy it as a couch play game anymore.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's pathetic that EU citizens need a USAmerican to try and rally us to protect our property. Absolute joke.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I think it's more an American needs your help cause there is not a chance in America to do it as the deck is too much stacked against Americans.

[–] waxyloins@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ross does live in the EU though...

[–] Gurei@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

He eats too many beans to be importing them, too, so he's supporting the local economy!

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

That's great. Doesn't change anything about how pathetic it is that the majority of European gamers don't want to help ourselves and didn't even try to start helping ourselves without a USAmerican.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

70% seems super low, I'd say 100%. Given enough time, if the online component is not released or emulated, that portion of the game that requires it WILL die. It is inevitable.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

wait are you telling me that people can't play all games at the same time all day forever? that calls into question what business people always know to be true, which is that resources are always available and unlimited. surely they can't be mistaken. you don't become a CEO without being a genius.