this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
575 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
5647 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla has confirmed its latest bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners will not get the Autosteer feature they paid for.

Instead, they will get a year of ‘Supervised Full Self-Driving’.

When Tesla started delivering the Cybertruck in late 2023, the software was incomplete, especially regarding its Advanced Driver Assist System (ADAS) features like ‘Supervised (FSD) Full Self-Driving’, which was included in the price of all early Cybertrucks.

It took Tesla almost a year to start releasing its FSD on the Cybertruck.

After Tesla stopped making new Cybertruck Foundation Series, which are fully loaded with all options, buyers started to have the option of buying the $8,000 FSD package or keeping only the Autopilot package, which is included in the price.

Autopilot’s two main features are Traffic Aware Cruise Control and Autosteer. The first is self-explanatory, while Autosteer is Tesla’s name for active lane keeping.

The vast majority of Tesla vehicle owners don’t buy the FSD package.

As of now, 16 months after Tesla started delivering the Cybertruck, the automaker has yet to deliver Autosteer on the electric pickup truck.

Today, Tesla started reaching out to Cybertruck owners to let them know that it won’t make Autosteer available for Cybertruck owners who haven’t bought FSD:

“As we improve our Autopilot technology, our feature sets will change. Accordingly, Autosteer will not be available for Cybertruck outside of Full Self-Driving (Supervised).“

Instead, Tesla offers a year of free FSD trial to Cybertruck owners.

More details in the article.

My favorite part is how they're now saying both "full self-driving' and "supervised".

Archive link: https://archive.is/1w64R

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

umm... good? This might actually might have saved some lives.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

By not delivering lane-keeping? I appreciate the unreasoning hatred, but some reasoning would be good too.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So besides Trump and Musk being passionate fuck buddies, how is this legal? Surely this is fraud and deceit right?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

A fine is just a fee for breaking the law.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 19 points 17 hours ago

every non-vandalized cybertruck is an affront to decent society

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 60 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Lmao they put lane-keeping assist behind a marketing-wank paywall for their already expensive EVs - something manufacturers like Subaru and Hyundai has made standard across their entire line for years now

What a sad joke this company has become, another example of failed leadership valuing yes-men and sycophancy

[–] forwhomthecattolls@sh.itjust.works 16 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I rode in a 2019 Subaru Ascent (like a big Outback) a few years ago, the lane keep assist was great even back then, not to mention the blind spot monitoring and all that. and it was all included. wtf is Tesla even doing with all that time and money??

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, plus the assist feature shuts itself off when it can't be used (ie. driving into the sun) unlike Tesla's version that instead chooses to ram you into a building then blames you for it by disengaging 0.1 seconds before the collision.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I love mine. Combined with adaptive cruise, it’s amazing for slowly rolling traffic, longer journeys, and stop-and-go traffic. I’m under no impression the car is ‘driving’ but having a machine take over the mental load is great and frees up that capacity for other driving tasks and/or awareness of the road.

Tesla calling that technology “Auto” anything without it being genuinely 100% autonomous should have landed someone a fat fine or jail time

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda like how autopilot works in planes

[–] bluedye@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

It’s going to Elon Musk bank account.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

Hyundai Lanekeep is better than teslas too

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It’s absolutely pitiful that they can’t figure out lane-keeping when a cars a fraction of the price have it.

It’s also a huge red flag that they are shipping “self driving” but can’t do lane keep assist.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They’ve “figured out” lane-keeping - they’re just keeping it reserved for FSD. It’s in FSD. They’re just now flipping to not offer it as a standalone feature, which don’t get me wrong is a shitty move.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is that the same lane-keeping that Full-Self-Drives into concrete barriers? https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/tesla-trial-wrongful-death-walter-huang

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh they know how to do it. They are just desperate to swindle existing owners since their vehicle sales have fallen off a cliff.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think they can, because they’re suffering so much from the rectal-cranial inversion that Musk started with his FSD.

Muskrat insists on using computer vision entirely, and building it in-house. Tesla (probably EM) as I recall also insulted MobilEye so they refuse to do business with them. Mind you, I think lane keeping is generally a computer vision problem.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

FSD has lane-keeping in it. It’s not up for debate if they can do it or not, because they’ve been doing it for years.

Also I’m not sure what other technology you think they would use for lane-keeping other than cameras and “computer vision”? Things like Lidar don’t work for this because lidar can’t see lane markers. The only way to do it is with cameras.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

Both. You can use both LiDAR and optical teaming, the technologies complement each other so you don’t fall for a Looney-Tunes ass painted wall, while the camera covers the one-dimensional recognition that LiDAR can’t.

[Tesla] removed radars from its vehicle lineup and even deactivated already installed radars in existing vehicles. This strategy has not yet been worth it since Tesla’s systems are still stuck at level 2 driver assist systems.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago

I have this on my Honda Fit for fuck's sake.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 10 hours ago

FSD? Fake Self Driving? False Self Driving? F#@& Says Driver?

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Tesla is the Fyre Festival of automotive manufacturers, except in this case Billy has managed to keep the kite in the air for an astonishingly long time.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 110 points 1 day ago

Buy from a con-man, get conned. Whoop-de-doo-de-doo.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 91 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Isn't Supervised Full Self-Driving an oxymoron? How can it be both Supervised and Full Self-Driving?

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

Fully man... fully.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The actual answer: It should be Level 4 autonomy. It is capable of full self driving, but only in certain conditions.

Do note that Tesla autopilot is actually only SAE level 2, so it's just a straight up lie :)

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How can it be both Supervised and Full Self-Driving?

It is not all the same.

You are full.
The car is self driving.
Tesla's interns in India are supervising both you and the car.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

No it’s not.

It fully drives itself, but legally you need to “supervise” it. It’s called that because of the laws around driving a car.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It can't be both. It's not self-driving. That's just what they call it to oversell it. I'm assuming they had to add the "Supervised" part for legal reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Class action goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sure there’s some bullshit fine print about binding arbitration. It’s so cool that corporations can just say “we waive your fundamental rights because we feel like it” and it’s just…legal. Greatest country on earth.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Companies can say whatever they want in their fine print but it’s not legally binding. If you want to do a class action over this, go for it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

No, that’s literally not how binding arbitration works in the US.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Leeuk@feddit.uk 29 points 1 day ago

Snake oil salesman.

VW where rightly punished for Dieselgate yet seems like the Texan is getting away with it (again). I also blame the US media. Remember to this date Tesla has never spent a cent advertising in America, their entire hype machine has been fuelled by sites like The Verge (until they eventually woke up a few years back - by which point Tesla had already sold gazillions of shares and took customers deposits). This is why we need real journalism more than ever, the bodies that regulate these cowboys are no longer fit for purpose.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago
[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I hope every single person who has, or ever will, buy a cybertruck a lifetime of misery and misfortune

May they stub their toe on every step for the rest of their life

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 19 hours ago

This tesla coil is a downward spiral!

load more comments
view more: next ›