this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
588 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

69867 readers
3305 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla has confirmed its latest bait-and-switch: Cybertruck owners will not get the Autosteer feature they paid for.

Instead, they will get a year of ‘Supervised Full Self-Driving’.

When Tesla started delivering the Cybertruck in late 2023, the software was incomplete, especially regarding its Advanced Driver Assist System (ADAS) features like ‘Supervised (FSD) Full Self-Driving’, which was included in the price of all early Cybertrucks.

It took Tesla almost a year to start releasing its FSD on the Cybertruck.

After Tesla stopped making new Cybertruck Foundation Series, which are fully loaded with all options, buyers started to have the option of buying the $8,000 FSD package or keeping only the Autopilot package, which is included in the price.

Autopilot’s two main features are Traffic Aware Cruise Control and Autosteer. The first is self-explanatory, while Autosteer is Tesla’s name for active lane keeping.

The vast majority of Tesla vehicle owners don’t buy the FSD package.

As of now, 16 months after Tesla started delivering the Cybertruck, the automaker has yet to deliver Autosteer on the electric pickup truck.

Today, Tesla started reaching out to Cybertruck owners to let them know that it won’t make Autosteer available for Cybertruck owners who haven’t bought FSD:

“As we improve our Autopilot technology, our feature sets will change. Accordingly, Autosteer will not be available for Cybertruck outside of Full Self-Driving (Supervised).“

Instead, Tesla offers a year of free FSD trial to Cybertruck owners.

More details in the article.

My favorite part is how they're now saying both "full self-driving' and "supervised".

Archive link: https://archive.is/1w64R

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 95 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Isn't Supervised Full Self-Driving an oxymoron? How can it be both Supervised and Full Self-Driving?

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

Fully man... fully.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How can it be both Supervised and Full Self-Driving?

It is not all the same.

You are full.
The car is self driving.
Tesla's interns in India are supervising both you and the car.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Just like Amazon's walk in walk out stores where Indian people did the actual checkout for them...

[–] gimmemahlulz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I haven't eaten since lunch yesterday 🥲

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

You know, some are full of solids, some... fluids, and some... even superfluous :)

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can't be both. It's not self-driving. That's just what they call it to oversell it. I'm assuming they had to add the "Supervised" part for legal reasons.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should get fined for being ambiguous and be forced to call it what it is.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It’s called what it is because of the laws that demand any self driving/automated driving be “supervised” and require regular checks that the driver is paying attention.

You’re essentially saying that Tesla should be made to do something that they’re already doing.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Supervised self driving would be fine. "Full self driving" means SAE level 4 or 5, which the Tesla autopilot isn't, and they don't need "supervised" in the name as they are specifically for a situations where there simply is no driver - like a robotaxi - so there can be no supervision.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The actual answer: It should be Level 4 autonomy. It is capable of full self driving, but only in certain conditions.

Do note that Tesla autopilot is actually only SAE level 2, so it's just a straight up lie :)

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

Supervised Full Self-Driving seems like a euphemism for driving with a driving instructor. You fully drive yourself but someone supervises you while you do it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No it’s not.

It fully drives itself, but legally you need to “supervise” it. It’s called that because of the laws around driving a car.

Its because Elon Musk is an oxy moron

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Parentheses, duh.