this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
139 points (87.6% liked)

World News

35584 readers
845 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 1 points 7 minutes ago

She wrote a whole series about how bigotry is bad but in retrospect, it feels like she didn't really understand why bigotry is bad. She just needed her children's books to have a moral message and she made a very surface level parallel to the holocaust. Then years later, she showed her ignorance about the holocaust by denying that transgender people were a target.

[–] clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee 19 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The reason is simple: she's a bigot. She has been successful at pushing her transphobic agenda into UK law, and she will continue to move across the spectrum because hate only knows how to hate even when they succeed.

This is exactly the reason I'm shifting from just warning people that buying her shit is immoral so outright calling them bigots for supporting bigotry. If they don't want to be bigots they can stop giving her their goddamn money.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 0 points 40 minutes ago (2 children)

I disagree with this take. Buying HP stuff won't change anything. Not "it will change very little". It will actually do nothing. If the whole world decided to stop buying anything that gave her money, it wouldn't change her lifestyle at all. She already made enough money that she never has to consider it for her lifestyle. People might as well enjoy what they like and not have one more thing weighing on their mental health. Let people have their escapism.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 4 points 29 minutes ago

You should encourage them to pirate any JK Rowling-associated content, then, if these people cannot be assed to read different books by different authors. Though obviously you're 100% correct in that she's already fabulously rich and a boycott of her works will not materially harm her. Also, she still has devoted bigoted fans who love being paypiggies, so a boycott is impossible.

[–] AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 1 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

You sure about that? Generally, people worth boatloads still cry about losing worth and refraining from encouraging IP's directly benefitting her could distract her or even send a message to her potential allies. It would maybe not change her ways, but it could change the platforms available to send her harmful ideas into the world.

Then for escapism, piracy is still available. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ There's also no shortage of things to do that don't concern her.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 12 minutes ago

refraining from encouraging IP's directly benefitting her could distract her or even send a message to her potential allies.

I also think that isn't worth it. You're still letting some rich moron's actions have too much sway over your mental health. What you're describing is the most tiny of marginal gains. Her IPs are already dying in relevance. Your energy would be better spent telling people about how cool some other thing is rather than how bad HP is. If someone loves HP and it makes them happy, I see no benefit to raining on their parade.

[–] Coding4Fun@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I support and share most of your opinions. She is a huge bigot and should be accountable for her actions. My only point is that we have kids and teenagers still consuming her books and products that are completely unaware of what is happening and shouldn't be called out because of that.

[–] clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

While I don't disagree I think it's important to keep in mind that kids and teenagers aren't stupid - they are capable of understanding that you shouldn't allow a bad person to continue to be a bad person if you have a conversation about why what JKR is doing is bad. Most of the vocal pushback that I've experienced offline has actually come from teenagers.

The problem lies squarely with millennial parents who continue to buy books/movies/games/merch for themselves or their young children because of nostalgia. They are old enough to know better, and should be held responsible for their actions.

[–] dan00@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago

There are very few people that can turn my stomach up like this bitch.

[–] Ickabod@lemm.ee 21 points 14 hours ago

What a hateful idiot lol that's all I can say

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 28 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You’d think this dumb cunt could just fuck off and enjoy her fortune, but no

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

This is literally fun to these people. Foaming at the mouth gives them energy, it's all they can run on anymore. Vapid angst.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Getting too much money reaaaaally fucks with your head. Becoming a billionaire should count as a brain injury.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Eh. It's more that you hear a lot about the nuts ones. Number 5 on the richest list is currently a guy named Bernard Arnault, who mostly French people know about, while the infamous Peter Thiel is at 129.

Same story here. Rowling may or may not have a full billion, but she's famous and good at getting rage views like this one.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How the actual fuck could asexuals offend you? smdh

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 14 hours ago

It does make me wonder if JK is actually asexual herself, and feels shame about it. Like how men who claim that "being gay is a choice" often feel that way because they consciously forced themselves to be straight despite their attraction to other men.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 26 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'll steelman her POV because it seems people are (rightly) confused.

Asexuals are requesting a day of recognition for what she sees as a negative-identity. Keep in mind, conservatives are often meritocratic.

It's like if there were a day for "coffee refrainers", for everyone who doesn't like drinking coffee. I'm sure if someone dunked on that day and the coffee refrainers, it'd all be in good spirits.

But if someone dunked on asexuality, I'm sure it'd cause a lot of upset and defensive argument, which implies more "merit" to asexuality.

While progressives can go "who cares, just leave em be", conservatives see all "non-deserved" attention as an affront to meritocracy, that needs to be squashed.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago

This actually really helps me understand her perspective. I think she's wrong of course, and even harmful, but I appreciate the steelman.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 91 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Harry Potter creator goes on rant about asexuals for some reason πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ

Because she is a homophobic piece of shit.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 35 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like Voldermor was inspired by her own persona

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago

More the Dursleys IMO. She hates the people who don't conform to her view of normality.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Homophobic? I thought she was just anti-trans.

Either way, I'm very curious how the LGBT community views a wholly trans-phobic shit stain that simultaneously claims to support the gay community. I know just such a person and would like some insight from the community itself.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

The term is TERF.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 11 points 16 hours ago

Homophobic? I thought she was just anti-trans.

Will she sure is not an ally, or even neutral.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

In the HP fanfiction community many/most despise her.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 37 points 18 hours ago

So transphobia wasn't enough to satisfy her bigoted brain, now she's going for asexual people as well. Pathetic.

[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 9 points 15 hours ago

Average JKR disaster of an opinion

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Irony is that the entire Harry Potter series is like discriminating against people for who they are is wrong.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, I'm pretty sure the slave race of house elves continue being slaves because "they love being slaves".

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

Didn't Hermione lead a campaign to liberate house elves but was laughed at by everyone until she dropped it?

Then Harry frees one elf and is considered a hero while the person trying to solve the systemic problems is a whiny bitch. She's showing how she thinks about the world with that one.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I mean she has to be a troll at this point for attacking asexual people right? J.K. Trolling

Like, it's just people who don't like sex, I don't understand the hate? And I'm about as far from asexual as you can get.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 36 points 19 hours ago

She hates asexual people for the same reason she hates transgender people, they're not conforming to her view of normality.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are a strange amount of people who seem to hate the idea of asexuality and this unfortunately includes people from all swaths of life like the LGBTQ+ community. I've seen too many gay people say hurtful, and frankly hypocritical, things along the lines of asexuality not existing and being more akin to a disease. It seems that while more people have become aware and accepting of homosexuality, they still don't understand asexuality and it scares them. Sad really. But luckily there are still lots of kind souls out there that will be accepting of anyone who's accepting in return. Maybe they can show everyone else the way...

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 0 points 4 hours ago

Honestly I don't understand it. Most likely don't. But it's also it's none of my business what consenting adults choose not to do.

Really the arguments are no different to any sexual interest. As long as the people are happy and consenting adults. I do not need to understand.

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 6 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, I've seen it from hypersexual people who seem to have unprocessed shame and need to believe their own behaviour is justified by being a universal human trait. The existence of asexuality threatens that.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 26 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

What the hell does the bottom post even mean? Is she saying she prefers segregated bathrooms? I knew she is a TERF but she's apparently also racist?

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 23 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

For a professional writer you'd think she would know that a quotation (even a fictional one) requires quotation marks around it to make it clear to the reader that it's not what you are saying but somebody else. Perhaps this makes more sense:

"Refusing to accept that people who don't like sex belong in the gay category is akin to wanting segregated bathrooms in the 1950s, John," as approximately a thousand gender activists will inform you once their hands stop literally shaking.

She's mocking the people who replied to her.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Wow she really isn’t very good.

How were we so starved for something that we latched onto her baloney?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm ace and JK can go fuck herself

[–] CaptainThor@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Well you’re not going to do it, what choice does she have?

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 12 points 18 hours ago

Did she get snubbed by someone who's ace or something? Asexuality is possibly the most inoffensive sexuality in existence.

Like, oh no.

They don't experience sexual attraction.

That means they're probably significantly less likely to objectify or assault you than someone who isn't ace. Isn't that a good thing for someone supposedly so concerned with being objectified and violated, Miss Rowling?

What a wildly brain-dead take from someone who loves claiming to be a feminist.

(Yes, I know she's not actually a feminist, but it's another piece of hypocrisy to throw on the pile)

[–] Pherenike@lemmy.ml 9 points 19 hours ago

She's pathetic.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

what fucking gave her the right to weigh in

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago

I can't wait for her to die. It's why I as a trans person keep living.

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

the goal of the lgbt isn't to only reduce oppression. it's also to raise awareness, because some people might not realise that they might be gay, bi, trans or ace, since our society is heteronormative.

i didn't know that being ace was a thing, and i felt sad and frustrated that i didn't have any crushes or felt sexually attracted to anything. when i found out about it, it was relieving that i wasn't alone. even now when people doubt me or say "you'll get over it", i don't pay mind to them at all, and tell them that asexuals are real, weather they like it or not.

[–] Mooseford@lemmy.today 5 points 17 hours ago

She been eating roadkill with RFK Jr.?

[–] Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 19 hours ago

Nowhere does it say fucking anything about oppression in the picture that she's losing her shit about here. It's something that she could've literally just scrolled past and gone on with her day. I'm so fucking sick of these people.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 19 hours ago

The reason is the billionaire TERF glitch.

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago

"fake oppression" as she does her best to oppress them

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί