this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
829 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21724 readers
3498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk sparked controversy by falsely claiming entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid have "$700 billion" in fraud annually, vastly exaggerating the actual figure (~$10 billion/year).

Musk labeled Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" and spread conspiracies about immigrants exploiting the system.

Critics argue Musk’s ignorance and conspiracy-mongering threaten essential public programs and data privacy, while his inflammatory rhetoric—such as calling Senator Mark Kelly, a former astronaut and combat veteran, a "traitor"—reinforces demands for his immediate removal from government.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Musk labeled Social Security a "Ponzi scheme"

Well, he is correct about that. But in true republican fashion his solution is to get rid of it, instead of reforming it to be more sustainable without infinite population growth

Maybe stop using "unelected". Most of the cabinet is technically "unelected". Focus on the part where he did not get a senate confirmation.

Like... he must be so unpopular if he can't even get a republican controlled senate to approve him.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee 17 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If he guts SS, it will be his demise. That’s all the working class has to look forward to.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 10 hours ago

They'll just hold a press conference and tell the people how that's Obama's (the black man, remember) fault.

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

77 million mouth breathers will blame “woke”

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They will themselves become "woke" when they realize they've been asleep for so long.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

You could've said that 1,000x by now. Nothing will wake these people up.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

At the first missed payment, they'll start burning down Social Security offices.

You don't want to piss off the old people. For many of them, its all they have. If you take that away, they'll have nothing left to lose, and lot of them are armed. That's a bad combination.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Republicans are doing a great job on both sides...social security in case your luck fucks out, and the market in case your thought you could get away:

Who said retirement? That's illegal! You and I will be working for elon until we both end up 6' under. (By that I mean fucking dead like a month Python parrot)

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 13 points 19 hours ago

Unelected tech lord deciding grandma's retirement funds is exactly the cyberpunk hellscape novels warned us about.

🐱

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 28 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Social Security is a non-partisan red line.

If this chode killed it his chances of survival would plummet.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I really hope he fucks with it.

I would buy all the popcorn to watch 2 million boomers walk up Pennsylvania Avenue to Gaddafi his ass for days.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Same, I truly believe Americans won't be on the same page about anything. Unless they fuck with it.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That the case may be, but he'd be a martyr for the ultra-capitalistic sorts that make these efforts their life's work.

A despicable end, but one that may appeal to Musk himself.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Nah. No one would mourn him. The next ultra rich person would learn from his mistakes, but continue on with his work.

[–] cool@lemmings.world 2 points 14 hours ago

We can't move to direct voting quickly enough.

Get these "representatives" out of power and put them in regular jobs like the rest of us.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why aren't you all protesting? You should all be out on the streets.

Your politicians aren't going to save you.

Everyone's situation is different, but for me: I'm not white and only have derived citizenship (as opposed to "natural born" citizenship), and my dad is still a Chinese Citizen (because he sucks at English for natualization test). They are already trying to deport Mahmoud Khalil. Can't risk putting a target on my family's back.

CCP is hostile and already tried killing me, theres no going back (not that I have Chinese Citizenship anymore anyways). I could end up stateless and that's not fun.

My only hope is that the fascists are incompetent and elections still exist in the future.

I think protesting is a very brave thing to do, but I also can't blame anyone for not doing so. Its very risky.

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There are protests everywhere. The media isn't covering them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

People in the US think politics is just another soap opera on the daytime TV that has nothing to do with their lives just like watching celebrities and Trump was picked because he adds to all that

Biden was deliberately put in office to be a good step stool for Trump

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] numlok@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

before his slash-and-burn nonsense and warped views of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid cause a spike in the sale of pitchforks.

Ha. I'd argue the time for pitchforks is already here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

He may not be elected but he paid the guy who got elected a ton of money, so that's basically the same as being elected... Right? Right?!?

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wonder why he always brings his toddler kid to public gatherings...

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I have a theory his kid is a human shield so he doesn’t get luigi’ed.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

He's been wearing that kid like a hat ever since that CEO got shot. First time anyone had EVER seen the kid in public, too, and suddenly he hasn't been seen anywhere without him.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 23 hours ago

Imagine getting older and realizing your dad only spent time with you to avoid getting shot. Poor kid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

All it does is puts a second person on that side of the trolly tracks.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

He needs to be able to steal that money, you guyzzzzz!

Enriching fElon is about "efficiency", at least according to MOE - the Ministry of Efficiency, where up is down, black is white.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

POS Nazi

Redundant statement is redundant.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

No. I'm sick of ratcheting right, of normalizing the former Republican president's regime by half, of promising that maybe, eventually, long after my kids have died of old age, we'll get around to fixing what's broken. A return to normalcy will only legitimize this fucking bullshit. The climate is collapsing, there's microplastics in my brain and balls, the wealthy are actively trying to re-establish feudalism, and the level best the democrats can do is hold up signs and give me downvotes when I say they're not doing enough. There's evidence coming out that microplastics inhibit photosynthesis and cause crop failures, the shit's everywhere, and lol and fucking behold the UN can't even talk about it without getting drowned in a tsunami of lobbyists. Yes, hello, my name is Timothy Thompson, I'm with United Plastics, and I'm here to tell you about how single use plastics are good actually; can I offer you $5,000? I've recently come around to the idea that there's only around 10,000 very specific enormously wealthy, influential, or both people that we'd need to persuade to make the world a better, more livable place for everyone on the planet now and in the future, and right now, they aren't being effectively persuaded.

Friendship ended with centrist democrats. I am now friends with accelerationism.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How many Luigi's do we need to persuade the rest of the 10,000?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

More than the one, it seems

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I do not understand why the fact that Musk is "unelected" matters so much to everyone. Is the Secretary of Defence elected? The Attorney General?

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Is the Secretary of Defence elected? The Attorney General?

Those are real positions that are appointed by every President. "DOGE" is a complete bullshit position/department pulled out of thin air to avoid any kind of confirmation and/or security clearance.

It is incredibly dangerous for a President to be allowed to invent whole government departments and appoint whoever he wants to them without any checks and balances.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sporkler@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I think it's just to point out another layer of legitimacy he doesn't have to do what he's doing.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You don't hear this criticism levelled at other malfunctioning government officials though. Perhaps one would if they went as off-the-rails as Musk. Still, I wish people would use accurate critiques of their opponents, such as as @Doctor_Satan mentions, that he is wholly without cheques or balances.

[–] sporkler@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And he's not a government official, even though he's impersonating one, and that the administration tells the public he's in charge of a government agency but tells the courts he's not.

While all of these things are true, I find it disingenuous to imply that his not having been elected is somehow less accurate than any other criticism levelled against him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

@sporkler @jsomae has he formally passed any security checks yet?

[–] sporkler@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

I doubt he could pass a captcha.

load more comments
view more: next ›