this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1540 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

68567 readers
4357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 387 points 1 month ago (10 children)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 88 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Cries in only Chrome and Edge at work 😒

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 68 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah. What company wouldn't allow it?

When I was working for an ad exchange, everyone had adblock installed in their browsers, I found that quite ironic.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would argue it's a security issue not to have any ad blocking. Many scams online start with popups or fake ads.

So if you get the opportunity to talk to IT that's what I would mention.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A good IT is blocking ads at a company-level. Browser extensions wouldn’t matter, and in fact, shouldn’t be allowed for the same reason.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You can only catch so much at the edge and DNS level. Browser extension catches the stragglers that get through. But we've mitigated virtually all browser induced malware possibilities by just moving to cloud-based internet isolation. It's similar to what the DoD uses, if anyone's familiar with their use case: https://www.bylight.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CBII_2020-2025.pdf

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 33 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Officially only Edge is supported, but Chrome is tolerated. It's a full MS environment.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Same here. The worst thing is in their justification of disallowing Firefox they listed that it was not an enterprise application. I get that it might be extra effort to support it but don't list something factually untrue as a lame cop out for why you don't want to.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Was told it wouldn't be allowed because you couldn't restrict it using GPO... Until I told them they could absolutely apply those restrictions using GPO and even provided the ADMX templates.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 268 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Nanook@lemm.ee 235 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google is not an IT company. It’s an advertising company. Surprised Pikachu, it blocks ad blockers.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's been an ad company for a long time, though, and blocking ad blockers is new.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 93 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But ublock origin lite is by the same dev.. Not as many features but it conforms to the new rules and is still much better than not having a blocker if you use chrome or edge.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Missing critical features:

Filter lists only update with the extension, you cannot update them dynamically

No making your own filters and thus no element picker for blocking annoyances on a webpage (a feature so good apple literally baked it into safari)

No support for external lists (which means if you back up your own filters into a list you cannot easily reimport)

No changing behavior on a per site basis

A number of other features as well that are more strictly power user features but still really handy like dynamic filtering and strict blocking domains.

If you have the option stop using chrome and edge, they are some of the worst options you could choose. Even outside of adblock and manifest v3 chrome is horrendous for data harvesting bullshit and edge isn’t great. If you don’t have the option because of an overzealous it dept or whatever and are forced to use it ubo lite is your best option probably and my heart goes out to you

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 month ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Chrome is no longer available on my computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 69 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago (8 children)

And if you don't like Firefox, use one of the Firefox forks. Some of them are very Chrome-like.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago (34 children)

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  • Chrome is no longer available in my phone, computer,...
[–] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

the what store now

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I take this as a sign that it genuinely still works to block ads and hasn’t sold out and become malware like those others that used to be popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

never had a problem with firefox and youtube

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I know what he's talking about- there was some javascript spec or something that google proposed, and nobody else bought in, so it never actually became part of javascript's standard.

But google implemented it into chrome's javascript engine anyway, and then used it for youtube. There was some fallback code if the new functions weren't available, but, because of a 'mistake' they didn't work and basically made playback ass for a while until the open source community basically debugged and fixed the issue FOR google, and then spent a few weeks cramming it down google's throat that it needed fixed.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] jk1006@feddit.org 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that's too much effort for many :-(

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a way to save your already-installed extension, in "Manage Extensions..." Enable dev mode, then Pack Extension.

However the browser will probably just refuse to run it soon.

Vivaldi, for what it's worth, seems to still run uBlock Origin just fine. I am afraid to uninstall it now to test if it'll re-install properly.

My version: 7.1.3570.39 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

Might be time to finally move to Firefox though, if Vivaldi doesn't keep Manifest V2 support.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Vivaldi isn't even fully open-source anyway, so it's worth leaving regardless.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And that is why I went to Firefox once Google announced this bullshit.

Swapping is pretty painless. It even brings over all your passwords and stuff these days. Best get to swapping before Google disable that as well. They'd just love to keep you hostage.

[–] samTheSwiss@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Use a third party password manager, don’t rely on browser default ones

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Everyone should ditch chrome

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MindlessHunter4@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Glad I don't use chrome anymore. Though unfortunately everyone else I know still does.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί